As an example I sent a bug-report on 26 Nov to tell that the fix included
below is necessary to compile pg95-current on Ultrix with Digital's
standard C compiler c89. In fact I think that this fix is needed
for any C compiler sticking very close the standard, see my discussion
in the original bug report.
Erik Bertelsen
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
transsup.c: In function `TransBlockGetLastTransactionIdStatus':
transsup.c:122: warning: unsigned value >= 0 is always 1
gmake[3]: *** [transsup.o] Error 1
...
(old _bt_compare always returned >= 0 while comparing with P_HIKEY
on root page - it breaks root page when _bt_insertonpg tries insert
new minimal key into root page).
2. Fixed bug concerns "empty" pages: non-rightmost pages with only P_HIKEY
present on it. Such pages appear after vacuum.
Changes:
* Unique index capability works using the syntax 'create unique
index'.
* Duplicate OID's in the system tables are removed. I put
little scripts called 'duplicate_oids' and 'find_oid' in
include/catalog that help to find and remove duplicate OID's.
I also moved 'unused_oids' from backend/catalog to
include/catalog, since it has to be in the same directory
as the include files in order to work.
* The backend tries converting the name of a function or aggregate
to all lowercase if the original name given doesn't work (mostly
for compatibility with ODBC).
* You can 'SELECT NULL' to your heart's content.
* I put my _bt_updateitem fix in instead, which uses
_bt_insertonpg so that even if the new key is so big that
the page has to be split, everything still works.
* All literal references to system catalog OID's have been
replaced with references to define'd constants from the catalog
header files.
* I added a couple of node copy functions. I think this was a
preliminary attempt to get rules to work.
I found another bug in btree index. Looking at the code it seems that NULL
keys are never used to build or scan a btree index (see the explain commands
in the example). However this is not the case when a null key is retrieved
in an outer loop of a join select and used in an index scan of an inner loop.
This bug causes at least three kinds of problems:
1) the backend crashes when it tries to compare a text string with a null.
2) it is not possible to find tuples with null keys in a join.
3) null is considered equal to 0 when the datum is passed by value, see
the last query.
Submitted by: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
My guess is that the thing had bugs, and the pfree was commented out.
The thing is probabally free'ed anyway at the end, so it was not a bad
thing.
If it does cause a bug, it will generate an error when hit, so I say
unless someone else knows, let's remove it and run the regression test.
-Bruce
Bruce Momjian
Bryan Henderson
Vadim B. Mikheev
Marc G. Fournier