- subscriber stats reset path was untested
- slot stat sreset path for all slots was untested
- pg_stat_database.sessions etc was untested
- pg_stat_reset_shared() was untested, for any kind of shared stats
- pg_stat_reset() was untested
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220303021600.hs34ghqcw6zcokdh@alap3.anarazel.de
In the stats collector days it was hard to write tests for the stats system,
because fundamentally delivery of stats messages over UDP was not
synchronous (nor guaranteed). Now we easily can force pending stats updates to
be flushed synchronously.
This moves stats.sql into a parallel group, there isn't a reason for it to run
in isolation anymore. And it may shake out some bugs.
Bumps catversion.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220303021600.hs34ghqcw6zcokdh@alap3.anarazel.de
Some of the tests were not considering that the slot's spill stats could be
received by the stats collector after we have reset the stats. Remove
those tests and don't check total bytes decoded and sent to output plugin
in the spilled stats test as we can send the spilled stats to the stats
collector before actually sending the changes to output plugin.
Reported-by: Tom Lane as per buildfarm
Author: Vignesh C, Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
As per analysis, it appears that the 'drop slot' message from the previous
test and 'create slot' message of the new test are either missed or not
yet delivered to the stats collector due to which we will still see the
stats from the old slot. This can happen rarely which could be the reason
that we are seeing some failures in the buildfarm randomly. To avoid that
we are using a different slot name for the tests in
test_decoding/sql/stats.sql.
Reported-by: Tom Lane based on buildfarm reports
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Vignesh C
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
In the new test after resetting the stats, we were not waiting for the
stats message to be delivered. Also, we need to decode the results for
the new test, otherwise, it will show the old stats.
In passing,
a. Change docs added by commit f5fc2f5b23 as per suggestion by
Justin Pryzby.
b. Bump the PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID as commit f5fc2f5b23 changes the file
format of stats.
Reported-by: Tom Lane based on buildfarm reports
Author: Vignesh C, Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
This adds the statistics about total transactions count and total
transaction data logically sent to the decoding output plugin from
ReorderBuffer. Users can query the pg_stat_replication_slots view to check
these stats.
Suggested-by: Andres Freund
Author: Vignesh C and Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
When accessing replication slot stats, introduced in 9868167500,
pgstat_read_statsfiles() reads the data into newly allocated
memory. Unfortunately the current memory context at that point is the
callers, leading to leaks and use-after-free dangers.
The fix is trivial, explicitly use pgStatLocalContext. There's some
potential for further improvements, but that's outside of the scope of
this bugfix.
No backpatch necessary, feature is only in HEAD.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210317230447.c7uc4g3vbs4wi32i@alap3.anarazel.de
Change the attribute 'name' to 'slot_name' in pg_stat_replication_slots
view to make it clear and that way we will be consistent with the other
places like pg_stat_wal_receiver view where we display the same attribute.
In the passing, fix the typo in one of the macros in the related code.
Bump the catversion as we have modified the name in the catalog as well.
Reported-by: Noriyoshi Shinoda
Author: Noriyoshi Shinoda
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k5_pPAYRTDrO2PbtTOe0eHQpBvuqmCr8ic39uTNmR49Eg@mail.gmail.com
The test cases added by that commit were trying to test the exact number of
times a particular transaction has spilled. However, that number can vary if
any background transaction (say by autovacuum) happens in parallel to the main
transaction. So let's not try to verify the exact count.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k5_pPAYRTDrO2PbtTOe0eHQpBvuqmCr8ic39uTNmR49Eg@mail.gmail.com
Andres Freund
Amit Kapila