Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog,
access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in
miscellaneous utility/library code.
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
Provide support for dynamic or static parties of processes to wait for
all processes to reach point in the code before continuing.
This is similar to the mechanism of the same name in POSIX threads and
MPI, though has explicit phasing and dynamic party support like the
Java core library's Phaser.
This will be used by an upcoming patch adding support for parallel
hash joins.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2_y7oi01OjA_wLvYcWMc9_d=LaoxrY3eiROCZkB_qakA@mail.gmail.com
A new thing also called a "barrier" is proposed, but whether we decide
to take that patch or not, this file seems to have outlived its
usefulness.
Thomas Munro
Several upcoming performance/scalability improvements require atomic
operations. This new API avoids the need to splatter compiler and
architecture dependent code over all the locations employing atomic
ops.
For several of the potential usages it'd be problematic to maintain
both, a atomics using implementation and one using spinlocks or
similar. In all likelihood one of the implementations would not get
tested regularly under concurrency. To avoid that scenario the new API
provides a automatic fallback of atomic operations to spinlocks. All
properties of atomic operations are maintained. This fallback -
obviously - isn't as fast as just using atomic ops, but it's not bad
either. For one of the future users the atomics ontop spinlocks
implementation was actually slightly faster than the old purely
spinlock using implementation. That's important because it reduces the
fear of regressing older platforms when improving the scalability for
new ones.
The API, loosely modeled after the C11 atomics support, currently
provides 'atomic flags' and 32 bit unsigned integers. If the platform
efficiently supports atomic 64 bit unsigned integers those are also
provided.
To implement atomics support for a platform/architecture/compiler for
a type of atomics 32bit compare and exchange needs to be
implemented. If available and more efficient native support for flags,
32 bit atomic addition, and corresponding 64 bit operations may also
be provided. Additional useful atomic operations are implemented
generically ontop of these.
The implementation for various versions of gcc, msvc and sun studio have
been tested. Additional existing stub implementations for
* Intel icc
* HUPX acc
* IBM xlc
are included but have never been tested. These will likely require
fixes based on buildfarm and user feedback.
As atomic operations also require barriers for some operations the
existing barrier support has been moved into the atomics code.
Author: Andres Freund with contributions from Oskari Saarenmaa
Reviewed-By: Amit Kapila, Robert Haas, Heikki Linnakangas and Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: CA+TgmoYBW+ux5-8Ja=Mcyuy8=VXAnVRHp3Kess6Pn3DMXAPAEA@mail.gmail.com,
20131015123303.GH5300@awork2.anarazel.de,
20131028205522.GI20248@awork2.anarazel.de
x86's memory barrier assembly was marked as clobbering "memory" but
not "cc" even though 'addl' sets various flags. As it turns out gcc on
x86 implicitly assumes "cc" on every inline assembler statement, so
it's not a bug. But as that's poorly documented and might get copied
to architectures or compilers where that's not the case, it seems
better to be precise.
Discussion: 20140919100016.GH4277@alap3.anarazel.de
To keep the code common, backpatch to 9.2 where explicit memory
barriers were introduced.
Support for running postgres on Alpha hasn't been tested for a long
while. Due to Alpha's uniquely lax cache coherency model it's a hard
to develop for platform (especially blindly!) and thought to be
unlikely to currently work correctly.
As Alpha is the only supported architecture for Tru64 drop support for
it as well. Tru64's support has ended 2012 and it has been in
maintenance-only mode for much longer.
Also remove stray references to __ksr__ and ultrix defines.
On HPPA, implement pg_memory_barrier() as pg_compiler_barrier(), which
should be correct since this arch doesn't do memory access reordering,
and is anyway better than the completely-nonfunctional-on-this-arch
dummy_spinlock code. (But note this patch only fixes things for gcc,
not for builds with HP's compiler.)
Also, fix incorrect default definition of pg_memory_barrier as a macro
requiring an argument.
Also, fix incorrect spelling of "#elif" as "#else if" in icc code path
(spotted by pgindent).
This doesn't come close to fixing all of the functional and stylistic
deficiencies in barrier.h, but at least it un-breaks my personal build.
Now that we're actually using barriers in the code, this file is going
to need some serious attention.
Itanium doesn't have the mfence instruction - that's a 386 thing. Use the
"mf" instruction instead.
This reverts the previous commit to add "#include <emmintrinsic.h>"; the
problem was not with a missing #include.
This is not actually used anywhere yet, but it gets the basic
infrastructure in place. It is fairly likely that there are bugs, and
support for some important platforms may be missing, so we'll need to
refine this as we go along.
Bruce Momjian
Peter Geoghegan
Thomas Munro
Andres Freund
Robert Haas
Tom Lane
Heikki Linnakangas