It adds a WITH OIDS option to the copy command, which allows
dumping and loading of oids.
If a copy command tried to load in an oid that is greater than
its current system max oid, the system max oid is incremented. No
checking is done to see if other backends are running and have cached
oids.
pg_dump as its first step when using the -o (oid) option, will
copy in a dummy row to set the system max oid value so as rows are
loaded in, they are certain to be lower than the system oid.
pg_dump now creates indexes at the end to speed loading
Submitted by: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
When you try to do any UPDATE of the catalog class pg_class, such as
to change ownership of a class, the backend crashes.
This is really two serial bugs: 1) there is a hardcoded copy of the
schema of pg_class in the postgres program, and it doesn't match the
actual class that initdb creates in the database; 2) Parts of postgres
determine whether to pass an attribute value by value or by reference
based on the attbyval attribute of the attribute in class
pg_attribute. Other parts of postgres have it hardcoded. For the
relacl[] attribute in class pg_class, attbyval does not match the
hardcoded expectation.
The fix is to correct the hardcoded schema for pg_attribute and to
change the fetchatt macro so it ignores attbyval for all variable
length attributes. The fix also adds a bunch of logic documentation and
extends genbki.sh so it allows source files to contain such documentation.
--
Bryan Henderson Phone 408-227-6803
San Jose, California
Postgres is not able to cluster a relation on which an rtree index is
defined. Postmaster gives the following error message:
Too Large Allocation Request("!(0 < (size) && (size) <= (0xfffffff)):size=0
[0x0]", File:"/export/home/postgres/src/backend/utils/mmgr/mcxt.c", Line: 220)
!(0 <(size) && (size) <= (0xfffffff)) (0) [No such file or directory]
Submitted by: Dirk Koeser <koeser@informatik.uni-rostock.de>
Here's a small patch that my run-time checker whines about
incessantly. The justification for the patch is along the
lines of passing a NULL is allowed if you have an
arguement that is a *POINTER* to something, but if
the arguement is an array reference, it's not really
a "pointer", so it can't be NULL.
If you question this, I refer you to
<URL:http://www.va.pubnix.com/staff/djm/lore/arrays-are-not-pointers>
Anyways, here's the patch:
-Kurt
Submitted by: "Kurt J. Lidl" <lidl@va.pubnix.com>
> INDEXED searches in some cases DO NOT WORK.
> Although simple search expressions (i.e. with a constant value on
> the right side of an operator) work, performing a join (by putting
> a field of some other table on the right side of an operator) produces
> empty output.
> WITHOUT indices, everything works fine.
>
submitted by: "Vadim B. Mikheev" <root@ais.sable.krasnoyarsk.su>
Marc G. Fournier