When min_parallel_relation_size was added, the only supported type
of parallel scan was a parallel sequential scan, but there are
pending patches for parallel index scan, parallel index-only scan,
and parallel bitmap heap scan. Those patches introduce two new
types of complications: first, what's relevant is not really the
total size of the relation but the portion of it that we will scan;
and second, index pages and heap pages shouldn't necessarily be
treated in exactly the same way. Typically, the number of index
pages will be quite small, but that doesn't necessarily mean that
a parallel index scan can't pay off.
Therefore, we introduce min_parallel_table_scan_size, which works
out a degree of parallelism for scans based on the number of table
pages that will be scanned (and which is therefore equivalent to
min_parallel_relation_size for parallel sequential scans) and also
min_parallel_index_scan_size which can be used to work out a degree
of parallelism based on the number of index pages that will be
scanned.
Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1KowGSYYVpd2qPpaPPA5R90r++QwDFbrRECTE9H_HvpOg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+TnM4pXQbvn7OXqam+k_HZqb0ROZUMxOiL6DWJYCyYow@mail.gmail.com
The core of the functionality was already implemented when
pg_import_system_collations was added. This just exposes it as an
option in the SQL command.
This doesn't do anything to make Param nodes anything other than
parallel-restricted, so this only helps with uncorrelated subplans,
and it's not necessarily very cheap because each worker will run the
subplan separately (just as a Hash Join will build a separate copy of
the hash table in each participating process), but it's a first step
toward supporting cases that are more likely to help in practice, and
is occasionally useful on its own.
Amit Kapila, reviewed and tested by Rafia Sabih, Dilip Kumar, and
me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+e8Z45D2n+rnDMDYsVEb5iW7jqaCH_tvPMYau=1Rru9w@mail.gmail.com
This module was intended to ease migrations of applications that used
the pre-8.3 version of text search to the in-core version introduced
in that release. However, since all pre-8.3 releases of the database
have been out of support for more than 5 years at this point, we
expect that few people are depending on it at this point. If some
people still need it, nothing prevents it from being maintained as a
separate extension, outside of core.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmob5R8aDHiFRTQsSJbT1oreKg2FOSBrC=2f4tqEH3dOMAg@mail.gmail.com
The ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE implementation can issue DROP INDEX and
CREATE INDEX to refit existing indexes for the new column type. Since
this CREATE INDEX is an implementation detail of an index alteration,
the ensuing DefineIndex() should skip ACL checks specific to index
creation. It already skips the namespace ACL check. Make it skip the
tablespace ACL check, too. Back-patch to 9.2 (all supported versions).
Reviewed by Tom Lane.
This stores a data type, required to be an integer type, with the
sequence. The sequences min and max values default to the range
supported by the type, and they cannot be set to values exceeding that
range. The internal implementation of the sequence is not affected.
Change the serial types to create sequences of the appropriate type.
This makes sure that the min and max values of the sequence for a serial
column match the range of values supported by the table column. So the
sequence can no longer overflow the table column.
This also makes monitoring for sequence exhaustion/wraparound easier,
which currently requires various contortions to cross-reference the
sequences with the table columns they are used with.
This commit also effectively reverts the pg_sequence column reordering
in f3b421da5f, because the new seqtypid
column allows us to fill the hole in the struct and create a more
natural overall column ordering.
Reviewed-by: Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Commit f82ec32ac3 renamed the pg_xlog
directory to pg_wal. To make things consistent, and because "xlog" is
terrible terminology for either "transaction log" or "write-ahead log"
rename all SQL-callable functions that contain "xlog" in the name to
instead contain "wal". (Note that this may pose an upgrade hazard for
some users.)
Similarly, rename the xlog_position argument of the functions that
create slots to be called wal_position.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+Tgmob=YmA=H3DbW1YuOXnFVgBheRmyDkWcD9M8f=5bGWYEoQ@mail.gmail.com
A proposed patch, also by Thomas and in the same thread, would change
the output order of these. Independent of the follow-up patches
getting committed, nailing down the order in these specific tests at
worst seems harmless.
Author: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=1D4-tP7j7UAgT_j4ZX2j4Ehe1qgZQWFKBMb8F76UW5Rg@mail.gmail.com
In the large DO block, collect row TIDs into array variables instead of
creating and dropping a pile of temporary tables. In a normal build,
this reduces the brin test script's runtime from about 1.1 sec to 0.4 sec
on my workstation. That's not all that exciting perhaps, but in a
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS test build, the runtime drops from 20 min to 17 min,
which is a little more useful. In combination with some other changes
I plan to propose, this will help provide a noticeable reduction in
cycle time for CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS buildfarm critters.
Before, reading pg_sequences.last_value would fail unless the user had
appropriate sequence permissions, which would make the pg_sequences view
cumbersome to use. Instead, return null instead of the real value when
there are no permissions.
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Shinoda, Noriyoshi <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>
If we forcibly place a Material node atop a finished subplan, we need
to move any initPlans attached to the subplan up to the Material node,
in order to keep SS_finalize_plan() happy. I'd figured this out in
commit 7b67a0a49 for the case of materializing a cursor plan, but out of
an abundance of caution, I put the initPlan movement hack at the call
site for that case, rather than inside materialize_finished_plan().
That was the wrong thing, because it turns out to also be necessary for
the only other caller of materialize_finished_plan(), ie subselect.c.
We lacked any test cases that exposed the mistake, but bug#14524 from
Wei Congrui shows that it's possible to get an initPlan reference into
the top tlist in that case too, and then SS_finalize_plan() complains.
Hence, move the hack into materialize_finished_plan().
In HEAD, also relocate some recently-added tests in subselect.sql, which
I'd unthinkingly dropped into the middle of a sequence of related tests.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/20170202060020.1400.89021@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Given a targetlist like "srf(x), f(srf(x))", split_pathtarget_at_srfs()
decided that it needed two levels of ProjectSet nodes, failing to notice
that the two SRF calls are textually equal(). Because of that, setrefs.c
would convert the upper ProjectSet's tlist to "Var1, f(Var1)" (where Var1
represents a reference to the srf(x) output of the lower ProjectSet).
This triggered an assertion in nodeProjectSet.c complaining that it found
no SRFs to evaluate, as reported by Erik Rijkers.
What we want in such a case is to evaluate srf(x) only once and use a plain
Result node to compute "Var1, f(Var1)"; that gives results similar to what
previous versions produced, whereas allowing srf(x) to be evaluated again
in an upper ProjectSet would square the number of rows emitted.
Furthermore, even if the SRF calls aren't textually identical, we want them
to be evaluated in lockstep, because that's what happened in the old
implementation. But split_pathtarget_at_srfs() got this completely wrong,
using two levels of ProjectSet for a case like "srf(x), f(srf(y))".
Hence, rewrite split_pathtarget_at_srfs() from the ground up so that it
groups SRFs according to the depth of nesting of SRFs in their arguments.
This is pretty much how we envisioned that working originally, but I blew
it when it came to implementation.
In passing, optimize the case of target == input_target, which I noticed
is not only possible but quite common.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dcbd2853c05d22088766553d60dc78c6@xs4all.nl
This commit improves on the results of commit 511ae628f in two ways:
1. It restores the historical behavior that "\set FOO" is interpreted
as setting FOO to "on", if FOO is a boolean control variable. We
already found one test script that was expecting that behavior, and
the psql documentation certainly does nothing to discourage people
from assuming that would work, since it often says just "if FOO is set"
when describing the effects of a boolean variable. However, now this
case will result in actually setting FOO to "on", not an empty string.
2. It arranges for an "\unset" of a control variable to set the value
back to its default value, rather than becoming apparently undefined.
The control variables are also initialized that way at psql startup.
In combination, these things guarantee that a control variable always
has a displayable value that reflects what psql is actually doing.
That is a pretty substantial usability improvement.
The implementation involves adding a second type of variable hook function
that is able to replace a proposed new value (including NULL) with another
one. We could alternatively have complicated the API of the assign hook,
but this way seems better since many variables can share the same
substitution hook function.
Also document the actual behavior of these variables more fully,
including covering assorted behaviors that were there before but
never documented.
This patch also includes some minor cleanup that should have been in
511ae628f but was missed.
Patch by me, but it owes a lot to discussions with Daniel Vérité.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9572.1485821620@sss.pgh.pa.us
As pointed out by Alvaro, we actually use perltidy on the perl scripts
in the source tree, so go back to the results of a perltidy run for the
test_pg_dump TAP script.
To make it look slightly less tragic, I changed most of the independent
arguments into long-form single arguments (eg: -f file.sql changed to be
--file=file.sql) to avoid having them confusingly split across lines due
to perltidy.
Back-patch to 9.6, as the last patch was.
This view is designed along the same lines as pg_file_settings, to wit
it shows what is currently in the file, not what the postmaster has
loaded as the active settings. That allows it to be used to pre-vet
edits before issuing SIGHUP. As with the earlier view, go out of our
way to allow errors in the file to be reflected in the view, to assist
that use-case.
(We might at some point invent a view to show the current active settings,
but this is not that patch; and it's not trivial to do.)
Haribabu Kommi, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat, Michael Paquier, Simon Riggs,
and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJrrPGerH4jiwpcXT1-46QXUDmNp2QDrG9+-Tek_xC8APHShYw@mail.gmail.com
Quite a few of our built-in system views were not exercised anywhere
in the regression tests. This is perhaps not so exciting for the ones
that are simple projections/joins of system catalogs, but for the ones
that are wrappers for set-returning C functions, the omission translates
directly to lack of test coverage for those functions.
In many cases, the reason for the omission is that the view doesn't have
much to do with any specific SQL feature, so there's no natural place to
test it. To remedy that, invent a new script sysviews.sql that's dedicated
to testing SRF-based views. Move a couple of tests that did fit this
charter into the new script, and add simple "count(*)" based tests of
other views within the charter. That's enough to ensure we at least
exercise the main code path through the SRF, although it does little to
prove that the output is sane.
More could be done here, no doubt, and I hope someone will think about
how we can test these views more thoroughly. But this is a starting
point.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19359.1485723741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Previously, if the user set a special variable such as ECHO to an
unrecognized value, psql would bleat but store the new value anyway, and
then fall back to a default setting for the behavior controlled by the
variable. This was agreed to be a not particularly good idea. With
this patch, invalid values result in an error message and no change in
state.
(But this applies only to variables that affect psql's behavior; purely
informational variables such as ENCODING can still be set to random
values.)
To do this, modify the API for psql's assign-hook functions so that they
can return an OK/not OK result, and give them the responsibility for
printing error messages when they reject a value. Adjust the APIs for
ParseVariableBool and ParseVariableNum to support the new behavior
conveniently.
In passing, document the variable VERSION, which had somehow escaped that.
And improve the quite-inadequate commenting in psql/variables.c.
Daniel Vérité, reviewed by Rahila Syed, some further tweaking by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7356e741-fa59-4146-a8eb-cf95fd6b21fb@mm
In commit 6c268df, pg_init_privs was added to track the initial
privileges of catalog objects and extensions. Unfortunately, that
commit didn't include understanding of ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP, which
allows the objects associated with an extension to be changed after the
initial CREATE EXTENSION script has been run.
The result of this meant that ACLs for objects added through
ALTER EXTENSION ADD were not recorded into pg_init_privs and we would
end up including those ACLs in pg_dump when we shouldn't have.
This commit corrects that by making sure to have pg_init_privs updated
when ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP is run, recording the permissions as they
are at ALTER EXTENSION ADD time, and removing any if/when ALTER
EXTENSION DROP is called.
This issue was pointed out by Moshe Jacobson as commentary on bug #14456
(which was actually a bug about versions prior to 9.6 not handling
custom ACLs on extensions correctly, an issue now addressed with
pg_init_privs in 9.6).
Back-patch to 9.6 where pg_init_privs was introduced.
The formatting of the perl hashes used in the TAP tests for test_pg_dump
was rather horribly inconsistent and made it more difficult than it
really should have been to add new tests or adjust what tests are for
what runs, etc.
Reformat to clean that all up.
Whitespace-only changes.
Our current DDL only allows a database name to be specified in COMMENT
ON DATABASE, which Andrew Dunstan reports to make this test fail on the
buildfarm. Remove the line until we gain a DDL command that allows the
current database to be operated on without having the specify it by
name.
Backpatch to 9.5, where these tests appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e6084b89-07a7-7e57-51ee-d7b8fc9ec864@2ndQuadrant.com
We maintained two separate expected files because log_cnt could be one
of two values. Rewrite the test so that we only need one file.
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Hot_standby_feedback could be reset by reload and worked correctly, but if
the server was restarted rather than reloaded the xmin was not reset.
Force reset always if hot_standby_feedback is enabled at startup.
Ants Aasma, Craig Ringer
Reported-by: Ants Aasma
!foo means "the tsvector does not contain foo", and therefore it should
match an empty tsvector. ts_match_vq() overenthusiastically supposed
that an empty tsvector could never match any query, so it forcibly
returned FALSE, the wrong answer. Remove the premature optimization.
Our behavior on this point was inconsistent, because while seqscans and
GIST index searches both failed to match empty tsvectors, GIN index
searches would find them, since GIN scans don't rely on ts_match_vq().
That makes this certainly a bug, not a debatable definition disagreement,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Report and diagnosis by Tom Dunstan (bug #14515); added test cases by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170126025524.1434.97828@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Previously, type "unknown" was labeled as a base type in pg_type, which
perhaps had some sense to it because you were allowed to create tables with
unknown-type columns. But now that we don't allow that, it makes more
sense to label it a pseudo-type. This has the additional effects of
forbidding use of "unknown" as a domain base type, cast source or target
type, PL function argument or result type, or plpgsql local variable type;
all of which seem like good holes to plug.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2L28uwwbL9HUM-WR=hromW1Cvamkn7O-g8fPY2m=_7muJ0oA@mail.gmail.com
Previously, we left such literals alone if the query or subquery had
no properties forcing a type decision to be made (such as an ORDER BY or
DISTINCT clause using that output column). This meant that "unknown" could
be an exposed output column type, which has never been a great idea because
it could result in strange failures later on. For example, an outer query
that tried to do any operations on an unknown-type subquery output would
generally fail with some weird error like "failed to find conversion
function from unknown to text" or "could not determine which collation to
use for string comparison". Also, if the case occurred in a CREATE VIEW's
query then the view would have an unknown-type column, causing similar
failures in queries trying to use the view.
To fix, at the tail end of parse analysis of a query, forcibly convert any
remaining "unknown" literals in its SELECT or RETURNING list to type text.
However, provide a switch to suppress that, and use it in the cases of
SELECT inside a set operation or INSERT command. In those cases we already
had type resolution rules that make use of context information from outside
the subquery proper, and we don't want to change that behavior.
Also, change creation of an unknown-type column in a relation from a
warning to a hard error. The error should be unreachable now in CREATE
VIEW or CREATE MATVIEW, but it's still possible to explicitly say "unknown"
in CREATE TABLE or CREATE (composite) TYPE. We want to forbid that because
it's nothing but a foot-gun.
This change creates a pg_upgrade failure case: a matview that contains an
unknown-type column can't be pg_upgraded, because reparsing the matview's
defining query will now decide that the column is of type text, which
doesn't match the cstring-like storage that the old materialized column
would actually have. Add a checking pass to detect that. While at it,
we can detect tables or composite types that would fail, essentially
for free. Those would fail safely anyway later on, but we might as
well fail earlier.
This patch is by me, but it owes something to previous investigations
by Rahila Syed. Also thanks to Ashutosh Bapat and Michael Paquier for
review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2L28uwwbL9HUM-WR=hromW1Cvamkn7O-g8fPY2m=_7muJ0oA@mail.gmail.com
Commit 587cda35c added a test to updatable_views.sql that created
tables named the same as tables used by the concurrent inherit.sql
script. Unsurprisingly, this results in random failures.
Pick different names.
Per buildfarm.
Previously, ExecInitModifyTable was missing handling for WITH CHECK
OPTION, and view_query_is_auto_updatable was missing handling for
RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE.
Amit Langote, reviewed by me.
In 2ac3ef7a01, we changed things so that
it's possible for a different TupleTableSlot to be used for partitioned
tables at successively lower levels. If we do end up changing the slot
from the original, we must update ecxt_scantuple to point to the new one
for partition key of the tuple to be computed correctly.
Reported by Rajkumar Raghuwanshi. Patch by Amit Langote.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6%3Dm1qyqB2k6cjniuMMrYXb75O-MB4qGQMu8zg-iGGLjDw%40mail.gmail.com
The publication test didn't drop all the publications it was creating
when it was probably intending to do that. There is still a bug with
dependency tracking in there, but this should at least quiet down the
build farm.
I'd somehow talked myself into believing that set_append_rel_size
doesn't need to worry about getting back an AND clause when it applies
eval_const_expressions to the result of adjust_appendrel_attrs (that is,
transposing the appendrel parent's restriction clauses for one child).
But that is nonsense, and Andreas Seltenreich's fuzz tester soon
turned up a counterexample. Put back the make_ands_implicit step
that was there before, and add a regression test covering the case.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/878tq6vja6.fsf@ansel.ydns.eu
Due to the changed costing in that commit hash-aggregates started to
be used, which results in big-endian vs. little-endian output
differences. Disable hash-aggs for those tests.
Author: Andres Freund, with input from Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22891.1484791792@sss.pgh.pa.us
Account for the fact that the highest bound less than or equal to the
upper bound might be either the lower or the upper bound of the
overlapping partition, depending on whether the proposed partition
completely contains the existing partition or merely overlaps it.
Also, we need not continue searching for even greater bound in
partition_bound_bsearch() once we find the first bound that is *equal*
to the probe, because we don't have duplicate datums. That spends
cycles needlessly.
Amit Langote, per a report from Amul Sul. Cosmetic changes by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b94XgbqVoXMyxxs63CaqWoMS1o2gpHiU0F7yGnJBnvDc_A%40mail.gmail.com
In ExecInsert(), do not switch back to the root partitioned table
ResultRelInfo until after we finish ExecProcessReturning(), so that
RETURNING projection is done using the partition's descriptor. For
the projection to work correctly, we must initialize the same for each
leaf partition during ModifyTableState initialization.
Amit Langote
When a tuple is inherited into a partitioning root, no partition
constraints need to be enforced; when it is inserted into a leaf, the
parent's partitioning quals needed to be enforced. The previous
coding got both of those cases right. When a tuple is inserted into
an intermediate level of the partitioning hierarchy (i.e. a table
which is both a partition itself and in turn partitioned), it must
enforce the partitioning qual inherited from its parent. That case
got overlooked; repair.
Amit Langote
When considering a sequence's Data entry in dumpSequenceData, we were
actually looking at the sequence definition's dump flag to decide if we
should dump the data or not. That's generally fine, except for when the
sequence data entry was created by processExtensionTables() because it's
a config sequence. In that case, the sequence itself won't be marked as
dumping data because it's part of an extension, leading to the need for
processExtensionTables() to create the sequence data entry.
This leads to extension config sequence data not being included in the
dump when it should be. Fix this by looking at the sequence data's dump
flag instead, just as dumpTableData() was doing for tables (which is why
config tables were correctly being handled), and add a regression test
to make sure we don't break it moving forward.
All of this is a bit round-about since we can now represent which
components of a given dump item should be dumped out through the dump
flag. A future improvement might be to change checkExtensionMembership()
to check for config sequences/tables and set the dump flag based on that
directly, possibly removing the need for processExtensionTables().
Bug found by Daniele Varrazzo.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+mi_8ZmxQM7+nZ7pJ8uyfxc9V3o=UAG14dVqvftdmvw8OJ3gQ@mail.gmail.com
Patch by Michael Paquier, with some tweaking of the regression tests by
me.
Back-patch to 9.6 where the bug was introduced.
There doesn't seem to be any reason not to allow negative years to be
interpreted as BC, so do that.
The documentation is pretty vague on the details of this function, so
nothing needs to change there.
Reported-by: Andy Abelisto, in bug #14446
Evaluation of set returning functions (SRFs_ in the targetlist (like SELECT
generate_series(1,5)) so far was done in the expression evaluation (i.e.
ExecEvalExpr()) and projection (i.e. ExecProject/ExecTargetList) code.
This meant that most executor nodes performing projection, and most
expression evaluation functions, had to deal with the possibility that an
evaluated expression could return a set of return values.
That's bad because it leads to repeated code in a lot of places. It also,
and that's my (Andres's) motivation, made it a lot harder to implement a
more efficient way of doing expression evaluation.
To fix this, introduce a new executor node (ProjectSet) that can evaluate
targetlists containing one or more SRFs. To avoid the complexity of the old
way of handling nested expressions returning sets (e.g. having to pass up
ExprDoneCond, and dealing with arguments to functions returning sets etc.),
those SRFs can only be at the top level of the node's targetlist. The
planner makes sure (via split_pathtarget_at_srfs()) that SRF evaluation is
only necessary in ProjectSet nodes and that SRFs are only present at the
top level of the node's targetlist. If there are nested SRFs the planner
creates multiple stacked ProjectSet nodes. The ProjectSet nodes always get
input from an underlying node.
We also discussed and prototyped evaluating targetlist SRFs using ROWS
FROM(), but that turned out to be more complicated than we'd hoped.
While moving SRF evaluation to ProjectSet would allow to retain the old
"least common multiple" behavior when multiple SRFs are present in one
targetlist (i.e. continue returning rows until all SRFs are at the end of
their input at the same time), we decided to instead only return rows till
all SRFs are exhausted, returning NULL for already exhausted ones. We
deemed the previous behavior to be too confusing, unexpected and actually
not particularly useful.
As a side effect, the previously prohibited case of multiple set returning
arguments to a function, is now allowed. Not because it's particularly
desirable, but because it ends up working and there seems to be no argument
for adding code to prohibit it.
Currently the behavior for COALESCE and CASE containing SRFs has changed,
returning multiple rows from the expression, even when the SRF containing
"arm" of the expression is not evaluated. That's because the SRFs are
evaluated in a separate ProjectSet node. As that's quite confusing, we're
likely to instead prohibit SRFs in those places. But that's still being
discussed, and the code would reside in places not touched here, so that's
a task for later.
There's a lot of, now superfluous, code dealing with set return expressions
around. But as the changes to get rid of those are verbose largely boring,
it seems better for readability to keep the cleanup as a separate commit.
Author: Tom Lane and Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20160822214023.aaxz5l4igypowyri@alap3.anarazel.de
Thinko in commit a4523c5aa. It doesn't really affect anything at
present, but it would be a problem if any tests added later in this
file ought to get index-only-scan plans. Back-patch, like the previous
commit, just to avoid surprises in case we add such a test and then
back-patch it.
Nikita Glukhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8b70135d-ad38-bdd8-ac92-71e2b3c273cf@postgrespro.ru
This makes it possible to delete multiple keys from a jsonb value by
passing in an array of text values, which makes the operaiton much
faster than individually deleting the keys (which would require copying
the jsonb structure over and over again.
Reviewed by Dmitry Dolgov and Michael Paquier
These resulted in wrong answers if the relabeled argument could be matched
to an index column, as shown in bug #14504 from Evgeniy Kozlov. We might
be able to resurrect these optimizations by adjusting the planner's
treatment of RelabelType, or by adjusting btree's rules for selecting
comparison functions, but either solution will take careful analysis
and does not sound like a fit candidate for backpatching.
I left the catalog infrastructure in place and just reduced the transform
functions to always-return-NULL. This would be necessary anyway in the
back branches, and it doesn't seem important to be more invasive in HEAD.
Bug introduced by commit b8a18ad48. Back-patch to 9.5 where that came in.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/20170118144828.1432.52823@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18771.1484759439@sss.pgh.pa.us
This avoids additional translatable strings for each distinct type, as
well as making our quoting style around type names more consistent
(namely, that we don't quote type names). This continues what started
as f402b99501.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20160401170642.GA57509@alvherre.pgsql
In an RLS query, we must ensure that security filter quals are evaluated
before ordinary query quals, in case the latter contain "leaky" functions
that could expose the contents of sensitive rows. The original
implementation of RLS planning ensured this by pushing the scan of a
secured table into a sub-query that it marked as a security-barrier view.
Unfortunately this results in very inefficient plans in many cases, because
the sub-query cannot be flattened and gets planned independently of the
rest of the query.
To fix, drop the use of sub-queries to enforce RLS qual order, and instead
mark each qual (RestrictInfo) with a security_level field establishing its
priority for evaluation. Quals must be evaluated in security_level order,
except that "leakproof" quals can be allowed to go ahead of quals of lower
security_level, if it's helpful to do so. This has to be enforced within
the ordering of any one list of quals to be evaluated at a table scan node,
and we also have to ensure that quals are not chosen for early evaluation
(i.e., use as an index qual or TID scan qual) if they're not allowed to go
ahead of other quals at the scan node.
This is sufficient to fix the problem for RLS quals, since we only support
RLS policies on simple tables and thus RLS quals will always exist at the
table scan level only. Eventually these qual ordering rules should be
enforced for join quals as well, which would permit improving planning for
explicit security-barrier views; but that's a task for another patch.
Note that FDWs would need to be aware of these rules --- and not, for
example, send an insecure qual for remote execution --- but since we do
not yet allow RLS policies on foreign tables, the case doesn't arise.
This will need to be addressed before we can allow such policies.
Patch by me, reviewed by Stephen Frost and Dean Rasheed.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8185.1477432701@sss.pgh.pa.us
The operators money*int8, int8*money, and money/int8 were implemented in
code but not registered in pg_operator or pg_proc.
Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
INSERT ... VALUES with a single VALUES row is implemented quite differently
from the general VALUES case. A user-visible implication of that is that
we accept SRFs in the single-row case, but not in the multi-row case.
That's a historical artifact no doubt, but in view of the lack of field
complaints, I'm not excited about fixing it right now.
However, check_srf_call_placement() needs to know about this, first because
it should throw an error in the unsupported case, and second because it
should set p_hasTargetSRFs in the single-row case (because we treat that
like a SELECT tlist). That's an oversight in commit a4c35ea1c.
To fix, split EXPR_KIND_VALUES into two values. So far as I can see,
this is the only place where we need to distinguish the two cases at
present; but there might be more later.
Patch by me, per report from Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170116081548.zg63zltblwimpfgp@alap3.anarazel.de
Normally, if we have a WHERE clause like "indexcol = constant",
the planner will figure out that that index column can be ignored
when determining whether the index has a desired sort ordering.
But this failed to work for boolean index columns, because a
condition like "boolcol = true" is canonicalized to just "boolcol"
which does not give rise to an EquivalenceClass. Add a check to
allow the same type of deduction to be made in this case too.
Per a complaint from Dima Pavlov. Arguably this is a bug, but given the
limited impact and the small number of complaints so far, I won't risk
destabilizing plans in stable branches by back-patching.
Patch by me, reviewed by Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1788.1481605684@sss.pgh.pa.us
This changes the default values of the following parameters:
wal_level = replica
max_wal_senders = 10
max_replication_slots = 10
in order to make it possible to make a backup and set up simple
replication on the default settings, without requiring a system restart.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevEy4PR_EAvZEzsbF5s+V0eEvw7shJ2t-AUwbHOjT+yRb3A@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed by Peter Eisentraut. Benchmark help from Tomas Vondra.
The different actions in pg_ctl had different defaults for -w and -W,
mostly for historical reasons. Most users will want the -w behavior, so
make that the default.
Remove the -w option in most example and test code, so avoid confusion
and reduce verbosity. pg_upgrade is not touched, so it can continue to
work with older installations.
Reviewed-by: Beena Emerson <memissemerson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy@gmail.com>
Various example and test code used -m fast explicitly, but since it's
the default, this can be omitted now or should be replaced by a better
example.
pg_upgrade is not touched, so it can continue to operate with older
installations.
Commit 0563a3a8b just introduced another instance of the same unsafe
testing methodology that appeared in 2ac3ef7a0, which I corrected in
257d81572. Robert/Amit, please stop doing that.
Also look through the rest of f0e44751d's test cases, and correct some
other queries with underdetermined ordering of results from the system
catalogs. These haven't failed in the buildfarm yet, but I don't
have any confidence in that staying true.
Per multiple buildfarm members.
Move the code for doing parent attnos to child attnos mapping for Vars
in partition constraint expressions to a separate function
map_partition_varattnos() and call it from the appropriate places.
Doing it in get_qual_from_partbound(), as is now, would produce wrong
result in certain multi-level partitioning cases, because it only
considers the current pair of parent-child relations. In certain
multi-level partitioning cases, attnums for the same key attribute(s)
might differ between various levels causing the same attribute to be
numbered differently in different instances of the Var corresponding
to a given attribute.
With this commit, in generate_partition_qual(), we first generate the
the whole partition constraint (considering all levels of partitioning)
and then do the mapping, so that Vars in the final expression are
numbered according the leaf relation (to which it is supposed to apply).
Amit Langote, reviewed by me.
If inherited tables don't have exactly the same schema, the USING clause
in an ALTER TABLE / SET DATA TYPE misbehaves when applied to the
children tables since commit 9550e8348b. Starting with that commit,
the attribute numbers in the USING expression are fixed during parse
analysis. This can lead to bogus errors being reported during
execution, such as:
ERROR: attribute 2 has wrong type
DETAIL: Table has type smallint, but query expects integer.
Since it wouldn't do to revert to the original coding, we now apply a
transformation to map the attribute numbers to the correct ones for each
child.
Reported by Justin Pryzby
Analysis by Tom Lane; patch by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170102225618.GA10071@telsasoft.com
array_fill(..., array[0]) produced an empty array, which is probably
what users expect, but it was a one-dimensional zero-length array
which is not our standard representation of empty arrays. Also, for
no very good reason, it rejected empty input arrays; that case should
be allowed and produce an empty output array.
In passing, remove the restriction that the input array(s) have lower
bound 1. That seems rather pointless, and it would have needed extra
complexity to make the check deal with empty input arrays.
Per bug #14487 from Andrew Gierth. It's been broken all along, so
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170105152156.10135.64195@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Inheritance operations must treat the OID column, if any, much like
regular user columns. But MergeAttributesIntoExisting() neglected to
do that, leading to weird results after a table with OIDs is associated
to a parent with OIDs via ALTER TABLE ... INHERIT.
Report and patch by Amit Langote, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat, some
adjustments by me. It's been broken all along, so back-patch to
all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cb13cfe7-a48c-5720-c383-bb843ab28298@lab.ntt.co.jp
After a tuple is routed to a partition, it has been converted from the
root table's row type to the partition's row type. ExecConstraints
needs to report the failure using the original tuple and the parent's
tuple descriptor rather than the ones for the selected partition.
Amit Langote
Add methods to the core test framework PostgresNode.pm to allow us to
test that standby nodes have caught up with the master, as well as
basic LSN handling. Used in tests recovery/t/001_stream_rep.pl and
recovery/t/004_timeline_switch.pl
Craig Ringer, reviewed by Aleksander Alekseev and Simon Riggs
The purpose of the test was to check access to the sequence relation on
a hot standby, so change the test to read a different column from the
sequence, instead of just reading the catalog.
From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Since streaming is now supported for all output formats, make this the
default as this is what most people want.
To get the old behavior, the parameter -X none can be specified to turn
it off.
This also removes the parameter -x for fetch, now requiring -X fetch to
be specified to use that.
Reviewed by Vladimir Rusinov, Michael Paquier and Simon Riggs
It is no longer necessary to restart the server to enable, disable,
or reconfigure SSL. Instead, we just create a new SSL_CTX struct
(by re-reading all relevant files) whenever we get SIGHUP. Testing
shows that this is fast enough that it shouldn't be a problem.
In conjunction with that, downgrade the logic that complains about
pg_hba.conf "hostssl" lines when SSL isn't active: now that's just
a warning condition not an error.
An issue that still needs to be addressed is what shall we do with
passphrase-protected server keys? As this stands, the server would
demand the passphrase again on every SIGHUP, which is certainly
impractical. But the case was only barely supported before, so that
does not seem a sufficient reason to hold up committing this patch.
Andreas Karlsson, reviewed by Michael Banck and Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/556A6E8A.9030400@proxel.se
Commit 2ac3ef7a0 added a query with an underdetermined output row order;
it has failed multiple times in the buildfarm since then. Add an ORDER BY
to fix. Also, don't rely on a DROP CASCADE to drop in a well-determined
order; that hasn't failed yet but I don't trust it much, and we're not
saving any typing by using CASCADE anyway.
interval_transform() contained two separate bugs that caused it to
sometimes mistakenly decide that a cast from interval to restricted
interval is a no-op and throw it away.
First, it was wrong to rely on dt.h's field type macros to have an
ordering consistent with the field's significance; in one case they do
not. This led to mistakenly treating YEAR as less significant than MONTH,
so that a cast from INTERVAL MONTH to INTERVAL YEAR was incorrectly
discarded.
Second, fls(1<<k) produces k+1 not k, so comparing its output directly
to SECOND was wrong. This led to supposing that a cast to INTERVAL
MINUTE was really a cast to INTERVAL SECOND and so could be discarded.
To fix, get rid of the use of fls(), and make a function based on
intervaltypmodout to produce a field ID code adapted to the need here.
Per bug #14479 from Piotr Stefaniak. Back-patch to 9.2 where transform
functions were introduced, because this code was born broken.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161227172307.10135.7747@wrigleys.postgresql.org
\crosstabview's complaint about multiple entries for the same crosstab
cell quoted the wrong row and/or column values. It would accidentally
appear to work if the data had been in strcmp() order to start with,
which probably explains how we missed noticing this during development.
This could be fixed in more than one way, but the way I chose was to
hang onto both result pointers from bsearch() and use those to get at
the value names.
In passing, avoid casting away const in the bsearch comparison functions.
No bug there, just poor style.
Per bug #14476 from Tomonari Katsumata. Back-patch to 9.6 where
\crosstabview was introduced.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/20161225021519.10139.45460@wrigleys.postgresql.org
The previous coding failed to work correctly when we have a
multi-level partitioned hierarchy where tables at successive levels
have different attribute numbers for the partition key attributes. To
fix, have each PartitionDispatch object store a standalone
TupleTableSlot initialized with the TupleDesc of the corresponding
partitioned table, along with a TupleConversionMap to map tuples from
the its parent's rowtype to own rowtype. After tuple routing chooses
a leaf partition, we must use the leaf partition's tuple descriptor,
not the root table's. To that end, a dedicated TupleTableSlot for
tuple routing is now allocated in EState.
Amit Langote
When we are altering a text search configuration, we are getting the
tuple from pg_ts_config and using its OID, so use TSConfigRelationId
when invoking any post-alter hooks and setting the object address.
Further, in the functions called from AlterTSConfiguration(), we're
saving information about the command via
EventTriggerCollectAlterTSConfig(), so we should be setting
commandCollected to true. Also add a regression test to
test_ddl_deparse for ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION.
Author: Artur Zakirov, a few additional comments by me
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/57a71eba-f2c7-e7fd-6fc0-2126ec0b39bd%40postgrespro.ru
Back-patch the fix for the InvokeObjectPostAlterHook() call to 9.3 where
it was introduced, and the fix for the ObjectAddressSet() call and
setting commandCollected to true to 9.5 where those changes to
ProcessUtilitySlow() were introduced.
Having a WITH OIDS specification should result in the creation of an OID
column, but commit b943f502b broke that in the case that there were LIKE
tables without OIDS. Commentary in that patch makes it look like this was
intentional, but if so it was based on a faulty reading of what inheritance
does: the parent tables can add an OID column, but they can't subtract one.
AFAICS, the behavior ought to be that you get an OID column if any of the
inherited tables, LIKE tables, or WITH clause ask for one.
Also, revert that patch's unnecessary split of transformCreateStmt's loop
over the tableElts list into two passes. That seems to have been based on
a misunderstanding as well: we already have two-pass processing here,
we don't need three passes.
Per bug #14474 from Jeff Dafoe. Back-patch to 9.6 where the misbehavior
was introduced.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/20161222145304.25620.47445@wrigleys.postgresql.org
When the input value to a CoerceToDomain expression node is a read-write
expanded datum, we should pass a read-only pointer to any domain CHECK
expressions and then return the original read-write pointer as the
expression result. Previously we were blindly passing the same pointer to
all the consumers of the value, making it possible for a function in CHECK
to modify or even delete the expanded value. (Since a plpgsql function
will absorb a passed-in read-write expanded array as a local variable
value, it will in fact delete the value on exit.)
A similar hazard of passing the same read-write pointer to multiple
consumers exists in domain_check() and in ExecEvalCase, so fix those too.
The fix requires adding MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly calls at the appropriate
places, which is simple enough except that we need to get the data type's
typlen from somewhere. For the domain cases, solve this by redefining
DomainConstraintRef.tcache as okay for callers to access; there wasn't any
reason for the original convention against that, other than not wanting the
API of typcache.c to be any wider than it had to be. For CASE, there's
no good solution except to add a syscache lookup during executor start.
Per bug #14472 from Marcos Castedo. Back-patch to 9.5 where expanded
values were introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15225.1482431619@sss.pgh.pa.us
In an attempt to simplify the tsquery matching engine, the original
phrase search patch invented rewrite rules that would rearrange a
tsquery so that no AND/OR/NOT operator appeared below a PHRASE operator.
But this approach had numerous problems. The rearrangement step was
missed by ts_rewrite (and perhaps other places), allowing tsqueries
to be created that would cause Assert failures or perhaps crashes at
execution, as reported by Andreas Seltenreich. The rewrite rules
effectively defined semantics for operators underneath PHRASE that were
buggy, or at least unintuitive. And because rewriting was done in
tsqueryin() rather than at execution, the rearrangement was user-visible,
which is not very desirable --- for example, it might cause unexpected
matches or failures to match in ts_rewrite.
As a somewhat independent problem, the behavior of nested PHRASE operators
was only sane for left-deep trees; queries like "x <-> (y <-> z)" did not
behave intuitively at all.
To fix, get rid of the rewrite logic altogether, and instead teach the
tsquery execution engine to manage AND/OR/NOT below a PHRASE operator
by explicitly computing the match location(s) and match widths for these
operators.
This requires introducing some additional fields into the publicly visible
ExecPhraseData struct; but since there's no way for third-party code to
pass such a struct to TS_phrase_execute, it shouldn't create an ABI problem
as long as we don't move the offsets of the existing fields.
Another related problem was that index searches supposed that "!x <-> y"
could be lossily approximated as "!x & y", which isn't correct because
the latter will reject, say, "x q y" which the query itself accepts.
This required some tweaking in TS_execute_ternary along with the main
tsquery engine.
Back-patch to 9.6 where phrase operators were introduced. While this
could be argued to change behavior more than we'd like in a stable branch,
we have to do something about the crash hazards and index-vs-seqscan
inconsistency, and it doesn't seem desirable to let the unintuitive
behaviors induced by the rewriting implementation stand as precedent.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28215.1481999808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26706.1482087250@sss.pgh.pa.us
When CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW acts on an existing view, don't update the
view options until after the view query has been updated.
This is necessary in the case where CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW is used on
an existing view that is not updatable, and the new view is updatable
and specifies the WITH CHECK OPTION. In this case, attempting to apply
the new options to the view before updating its query fails, because
the options are applied using the ALTER TABLE infrastructure which
checks that WITH CHECK OPTION is only applied to an updatable view.
If new columns are being added to the view, that is also done using
the ALTER TABLE infrastructure, but it is important that that still be
done before updating the view query, because the rules system checks
that the query columns match those on the view relation. Added a
comment to explain that, in case someone is tempted to move that to
where the view options are now being set.
Back-patch to 9.4 where WITH CHECK OPTION was added.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUp%3Dz%3Ds4SzZjr14bfct_bdJNwMPi-gFi3Xc5k1ntbsAgQ%40mail.gmail.com
It's not entirely clear that we should log a message here at all, but
it's certainly wrong to use elog() for a message that should clearly
be translatable.
Amit Langote
Move sequence metadata (start, increment, etc.) into a proper system
catalog instead of storing it in the sequence heap object. This
separates the metadata from the sequence data. Sequence metadata is now
operated on transactionally by DDL commands, whereas previously
rollbacks of sequence-related DDL commands would be ignored.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
If a query contained two aggregates that could share the transition value,
we would correctly collect the input into a tuplesort only once, but
incorrectly run the transition function over the accumulated input twice,
in finalize_aggregates(). That caused a crash, when we tried to call
tuplesort_performsort() on an already-freed NULL tuplestore.
Backport to 9.6, where sharing of transition state and this bug were
introduced.
Analysis by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ac5b0b69-744c-9114-6218-8300ac920e61@iki.fi
The distance of a removed phrase operator should propagate up to a
parent phrase operator if there is one, but this only worked correctly
in left-deep trees. Throwing in a few parentheses confused it completely,
as indeed was illustrated by bizarre results in existing regression test
cases.
To fix, track unaccounted-for distances that should propagate to the left
and to the right of the current node, rather than trying to make it work
with only one returned distance.
Also make some adjustments to behave as well as we can for cases of
intermixed phrase and regular (AND/OR) operators. I don't think it's
possible to be 100% correct for that without a rethinking of the tsquery
representation; for example, maybe we should just not drop stopword nodes
at all underneath phrase operators. But this is better than it was,
and changing tsquery representation wouldn't be safely back-patchable.
While at it, I simplified the API of the clean_fakeval_intree function
a bit by getting rid of the "char *result" output parameter; that wasn't
doing anything that wasn't redundant with whether the result node is
NULL or not, and testing for NULL seems a lot clearer/safer.
This is part of a larger project to fix various infelicities in the
phrase-search implementation, but this part seems comittable on its own.
Back-patch to 9.6 where phrase operators were introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28215.1481999808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26706.1482087250@sss.pgh.pa.us
This feature is also known as "quorum commit" especially in discussion
on pgsql-hackers.
This commit adds the following new syntaxes into synchronous_standby_names
GUC. By using FIRST and ANY keywords, users can specify the method to
choose synchronous standbys from the listed servers.
FIRST num_sync (standby_name [, ...])
ANY num_sync (standby_name [, ...])
The keyword FIRST specifies a priority-based synchronous replication
which was available also in 9.6 or before. This method makes transaction
commits wait until their WAL records are replicated to num_sync
synchronous standbys chosen based on their priorities.
The keyword ANY specifies a quorum-based synchronous replication
and makes transaction commits wait until their WAL records are
replicated to *at least* num_sync listed standbys. In this method,
the values of sync_state.pg_stat_replication for the listed standbys
are reported as "quorum". The priority is still assigned to each standby,
but not used in this method.
The existing syntaxes having neither FIRST nor ANY keyword are still
supported. They are the same as new syntax with FIRST keyword, i.e.,
a priorirty-based synchronous replication.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier, Amit Kapila and me
Discussion: <CAD21AoAACi9NeC_ecm+Vahm+MMA6nYh=Kqs3KB3np+MBOS_gZg@mail.gmail.com>
Many thanks to the various individuals who were involved in
discussing and developing this feature.
There's no good reason why plpgsql's GET DIAGNOSTICS statement can't
support an array element as target variable, since the execution code
already uses the generic exec_assign_value() function to assign to it.
Hence, refactor the grammar to allow that, by making getdiag_target
depend on the assign_var production.
Ideally we'd also let a cursor_variable expand to an element of a
refcursor[] array, but that's substantially harder since those statements
also have to handle bound-cursor-variable cases. For now, just make sure
the reported error is sensible, ie "cursor variable must be a simple
variable" not "variable must be of type cursor or refcursor". The latter
was quite confusing from the user's viewpoint, since what he wrote
satisfies the claimed restriction.
Per bug #14463 from Zhou Digoal. Given the lack of previous complaints,
I see no need for a back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161213152548.14897.81245@wrigleys.postgresql.org
This allows creating temporary replication slots that are removed
automatically at the end of the session or on error.
From: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
When ts_rewrite()'s replacement argument is an empty tsquery, it's supposed
to simplify any operator nodes whose operand(s) become NULL; but it failed
to do that reliably, because dropvoidsubtree() only examined the top level
of the result tree. Rather than make a second recursive pass, let's just
give the responsibility to dofindsubquery() to simplify while it's doing
the main replacement pass. Per report from Andreas Seltenreich.
Artur Zakirov, with some cosmetic changes by me. Back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8737i01dew.fsf@credativ.de
array_position and its cousin array_positions were caching the element
type equality function's FmgrInfo without being careful enough to put it
in a long-lived context. This is obviously broken but it didn't matter
in most cases; only when using arrays of records (involving record_eq)
it becomes a problem. The fix is to ensure that the type's equality
function's FmgrInfo is cached in the array_position's flinfo->fn_mcxt
rather than the current memory context.
Apart from record types, the only other case that seems complex enough
to possibly cause the same problem are range types. I didn't find a way
to reproduce the problem with those, so I only include the test case
submitted with the bug report as regression test.
Bug report and patch: Junseok Yang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE+byMupUURYiZ6bKYgMZb9pgV1CYAijJGqWj-90W=nS7uEOeA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch to 9.5, where array_position appeared.
expandRTE() and get_rte_attribute_type() reported the exprType() and
exprTypmod() values of the expressions in the first row of the VALUES as
being the column type/typmod returned by the VALUES RTE. That's fine for
the data type, since we coerce all expressions in a column to have the same
common type. But we don't coerce them to have a common typmod, so it was
possible for rows after the first one to return values that violate the
claimed column typmod. This leads to the incorrect result seen in bug
#14448 from Hassan Mahmood, as well as some other corner-case misbehaviors.
The desired behavior is the same as we use in other type-unification
cases: report the common typmod if there is one, but otherwise return -1
indicating no particular constraint. It's cheap for transformValuesClause
to determine the common typmod while transforming a multi-row VALUES, but
it'd be less cheap for expandRTE() and get_rte_attribute_type() to
re-determine that info every time they're asked --- possibly a lot less
cheap, if the VALUES has many rows. Therefore, the best fix is to record
the common typmods explicitly in a list in the VALUES RTE, as we were
already doing for column collations. This looks quite a bit like what
we're doing for CTE RTEs, so we can save a little bit of space and code by
unifying the representation for those two RTE types. They both now share
coltypes/coltypmods/colcollations fields. (At some point it might seem
desirable to populate those fields for all RTE types; but right now it
looks like constructing them for other RTE types would add more code and
cycles than it would save.)
The RTE change requires a catversion bump, so this fix is only usable
in HEAD. If we fix this at all in the back branches, the patch will
need to look quite different.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/20161205143037.4377.60754@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27429.1480968538@sss.pgh.pa.us
Robert Haas
Peter Eisentraut
Noah Misch
Andres Freund
Tom Lane
Heikki Linnakangas
Stephen Frost
Alvaro Herrera
Simon Riggs
Fujii Masao
Magnus Hagander
Bruce Momjian
Dean Rasheed