This is essential information when looking at an index that has
"included" columns. Per discussion, follow the style used in \dC
and some other places: column header is "Key?" and values are "yes"
or "no" (all translatable).
While at it, revise describeOneTableDetails to be a bit more maintainable:
avoid hard-wired column numbers and multiple repetitions of what needs
to be identical test logic. This also results in the emitted catalog
query corresponding more closely to what we print, which should be a
benefit to users of ECHO_HIDDEN mode, and perhaps a bit faster too
(the old logic sometimes asked for values it would not print, even
ones that are fairly expensive to get).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21724.1531943735@sss.pgh.pa.us
The multi-argument form of pg_get_indexdef() failed to print anything when
asked to print a single index column that is an included column rather than
a key column. This seems an unintentional result of someone having tried
to take a short-cut and use the attrsOnly flag for two different purposes.
To fix, split said flag into two flags, attrsOnly which suppresses
non-attribute info, and keysOnly which suppresses included columns.
Add a test case using psql's \d command, which relies on that function.
(It's mighty tempting at this point to replace pg_get_indexdef_worker's
mess of boolean flag arguments with a single bitmask-of-flags argument,
which would allow making the call sites much more self-documenting.
But I refrained for the moment.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21724.1531943735@sss.pgh.pa.us
The code added by 9c7d06d606 was a bit obscure; clarify that by
rewriting the comments. Lack of clarity has already caused bugs, so
it's a worthy goal.
Co-authored-by: Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelínek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87y3fgoyrn.fsf@ars-thinkpad
GatherMergePath (introduced in 10) and CustomPath (introduced in 9.5)
have gone missing. The order of the Path nodes was inconsistent with
what is listed in nodes.h, so make the order consistent at the same time
to ease future checks and additions.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBQMLoc=ohH-oocuAPsELrmk8_EsRJjOyR8FQLZkbE0wA@mail.gmail.com
Instead of MergeAppendPath, MergeAppend nodes were considered. This
code is not covered by any tests now, which should be addressed at some
point.
This is an oversight from f49842d, which introduced partition-wise joins
in v11, so back-patch down to that.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180718062202.GC8565@paquier.xyz
This script supposed that if it turned hot_standby_feedback on and then
shut down the standby server, at least one feedback message would be
guaranteed to be sent before the standby stops. But there is no such
guarantee, if the standby's walreceiver process is slow enough --- and
we've seen multiple failures in the buildfarm showing that that does
happen in practice. While we could rearrange the walreceiver logic to
make it less likely, it seems probably impossible to create a really
bulletproof guarantee of that sort; and if we tried, we might create
situations where the walreceiver wouldn't react in a timely manner to
shutdown commands. It seems better instead to remove the script's
assumption that feedback will occur before shutdown.
But once we do that, these last few tests seem quite redundant with
the earlier tests in the script. So let's just drop them altogether
and save some buildfarm cycles.
Backpatch to v10 where these tests were added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1922.1531592205@sss.pgh.pa.us
The initial version of the included-index-column feature stated that
included columns couldn't be the same as any key column of the index.
While it'd be pretty silly to do that, since the included column would be
entirely redundant, we've never prohibited redundant index columns before
so it's not very consistent to do so here. Moreover, the prohibition
was itself badly implemented, so that it failed to reject columns that
were effectively identical but not spelled quite alike, as reported by
Aditya Toshniwal.
(Moreover, it's not hard to imagine that for some non-btree index types,
such cases would be non-silly anyhow: the index might use a lossy
representation for key columns but be able to support retrieval of the
original form of included columns.)
Hence, let's just drop the prohibition.
In passing, do some copy-editing on the documentation for the
included-column feature.
Yugo Nagata; documentation and test corrections by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM9w-_mhBCys4fQNfaiQKTRrVWtoFrZ-wXmDuE9Nj5y-Y7aDKQ@mail.gmail.com
A collection of typos I happened to spot while reading code, as well as
grepping for common mistakes.
Backpatch to all supported versions, as applicable, to avoid conflicts
when backporting other commits in the future.
It's more logical this way, since the new ordering matches the way the
tables are created; but in any case, the previous location of PARTITION OF
did not appear carefully chosen anyway (since it didn't match the
location in which it appears in the synopsys either, which is what we
normally do.)
In the PARTITION BY stanza, add a link to the partitioning section in
the DDL chapter, too.
Suggested-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwY4Ld7ecxL_KAmaxwt0FUu5VcPPN2L4dh+3BeYbrdBa5g@mail.gmail.com
The existing error message was complaining that the column is not an
expression, which is not correct. Introduce a suitable wording
variation and a test.
Co-authored-by: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180628182803.e4632d5a.nagata@sraoss.co.jp
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
The original code was unable to prune partitions that could not possibly
contain NULL values, when the query specified less than all columns in a
multicolumn partition key. Reorder the if-tests so that it is, and add
more commentary and regression tests.
Reported-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Co-authored-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRc7qjLUfXLVBBC_HAnx644sjTYM=qVoT3TJ840HPbsTXw@mail.gmail.com
Since the old logic was completely unaware of subtransactions, a
change made in a subsequently-aborted subtransaction would still cause
workers to be stopped at toplevel transaction commit. Fix that by
managing a stack of worker lists rather than just one.
Amit Khandekar and Robert Haas
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9eaG_mWqiOTA2LfAug-VRNn1hrhf50Xi1YroxL37QkZNg@mail.gmail.com
Update links that resulted in redirects. Most are changes from http to
https, but there are also some other minor edits. (There are still some
redirects where the target URL looks less elegant than the one we
currently have. I have left those as is.)
In final_cost_hashjoin(), commit 9c7f5229a allowed inner_unique cases
to follow a code path previously used only for SEMI/ANTI joins; but it
neglected to fix an if-test within that path that assumed SEMI and ANTI
were the only possible cases. This resulted in a wrong value for
hashjointuples, and an ensuing bad cost estimate, for inner_unique normal
joins. Fortunately, for inner_unique normal joins we can assume the number
of joined tuples is the same as for a SEMI join; so there's no need for
more code, we just have to invert the test to check for ANTI not SEMI.
It turns out that in two contrib tests in which commit 9c7f5229a
changed the plan expected for a query, the change was actually wrong
and induced by this estimation error, not by any real improvement.
Hence this patch also reverts those changes.
Per report from RK Korlapati. Backpatch to v10 where the error was
introduced.
David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+SNy03bhq0fodsfOkeWDCreNjJVjsdHwUsb7AG=jpe0PtZc_g@mail.gmail.com
lca_inner() wasn't prepared for the possibility of getting no inputs.
Fix that, and make some cosmetic improvements to the code while at it.
Also, I thought the documentation of this function as returning the
"longest common prefix" of the paths was entirely misleading; it really
returns a path one shorter than the longest common prefix, for the typical
definition of "prefix". Don't use that term in the docs, and adjust the
examples to clarify what really happens.
This has been broken since its beginning, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Per report from Hailong Li. Thanks to Pierre Ducroquet for diagnosing
and for the initial patch, though I whacked it around some and added
test cases.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5b0d8e4f-f2a3-1305-d612-e00e35a7be66@qunar.com
Now that the documentation sources are in XML rather than SGML, some of
the documentation about the editor, or more specifically Emacs, setup
needs updating. The updated instructions recommend using nxml-mode,
which works mostly out of the box, with some small tweaks in
emacs.samples and .dir-locals.el.
Also remove some obsolete stuff in .dir-locals.el. I did, however,
leave the sgml-mode settings in there so that someone using Emacs
without emacs.samples gets those settings when editing a *.sgml file.
As of commit 37a795a60, populate_recordset_worker() tried to pass back
(as rsi.setDesc) a tupdesc that it also had cached in its fn_extra.
But the core executor would free the passed-back tupdesc, risking a
crash if the function were called again in the same query. The safest
and least invasive way to fix that is to make an extra tupdesc copy
to pass back.
While at it, I failed to resist the temptation to get rid of unnecessary
get_fn_expr_argtype() calls here and in populate_record_worker().
Per report from Dmitry Dolgov; thanks to Michael Paquier and
Andrew Gierth for investigation and discussion.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+q6zcWzN9ztCfR47ZwgTr1KLnuO6BAY6FurxXhovP4hxr+yOQ@mail.gmail.com
The patch that ended up as commit 3de241dba8 ("Foreign keys on
partitioned tables") lacked pg_dump tests, so the pg_dump code that was
there to support it inadvertently stopped working when in later
development I modified the backend code not to emit pg_trigger rows for
the partitioned table itself.
Bug analysis and code fix is by Michaël. I (Álvaro) added the test.
Reported-by: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b94n=UsNVhgs97vCaWEZAMe-tGDRVuZ73oePQH=eaJKGSA@mail.gmail.com
When reading an existing FSM or VM page that was found to be corrupt by the
buffer manager, the code applied PageInit() to reinitialize the page, but
did so without any locking. There is thus a hazard that two backends might
concurrently do PageInit, which in itself would still be OK, but the slower
one might then zero over subsequent data changes applied by the faster one.
Even that is unlikely to be fatal; but it's not desirable, so add locking
to prevent it.
This does not add any locking overhead in the normal code path where the
page is OK. It's not immediately obvious that that's safe, but I believe
it is, for reasons explained in the added comments.
Problem noted by R P Asim. It's been like this for a long time, so
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANXE4Te4G0TGq6cr0-TvwP0H4BNiK_-hB5gHe8mF+nz0mcYfMQ@mail.gmail.com
Starting and aborting transactions in security definer procedures
doesn't work. StartTransaction() insists that the security context
stack is empty, so this would currently cause a crash, and
AbortTransaction() resets it. This could be made to work by
reorganizing the code, but right now we just prohibit it.
Reported-by: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAJ_b96Gupt_LFL7uNyy3c50-wbhA68NUjiK5%3DrF6_w%3Dpq_T%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com
In ad9a274778, shmem_exit_inprogress was
introduced. But we need to reset it after shmem_exit(), because unlike
the similar proc_exit(), shmem_exit() can also be called for cleanup
when the process will not exit.
Reported-by: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Explain that you can use any integer expression for the "count" in
pl/pgsql's versions of FETCH/MOVE, unlike the SQL versions which only
allow a constant.
Remove the duplicate version of this para under MOVE. I don't see
a good reason to maintain two identical paras when we just said that
MOVE works exactly like FETCH.
Per Pavel Stehule, though I didn't use his text.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRAcvSXcNdUGx43bOK1e3NNPbQny7neoTLN42af+8MYWEA@mail.gmail.com
When truncating a table that is referenced by foreign keys in
partitioned tables, the check to ensure the referencing table are also
truncated spuriously failed. This is because it was relying on
relhastriggers as a proxy for the table having FKs, and that's wrong for
partitioned tables. Fix it to consider such tables separately. There
may be a better way ... but this code is pretty inefficient already.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquiër <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180711000624.zmeizicibxeehhsg@alvherre.pgsql
Commit ff4f88916 adjusted the code to enforce the SQL spec's requirement
that a window using GROUPS mode must have an ORDER BY clause. But I missed
that the documentation explicitly said you didn't have to have one.
Also minor wordsmithing in the window-function section of select.sgml.
Per Masahiko Sawada, though I didn't use his patch.
An update that causes the tuple to be moved to a different partition was
missing out on re-constructing the to-be-updated tuple, based on the latest
tuple in the update chain. Instead, it's simply deleting the latest tuple
and inserting a new tuple in the new partition based on the old tuple.
Commit 2f17844104 didn't consider this case, so some of the updates were
getting lost.
In passing, change the argument order for output parameter in ExecDelete
and add some commentary about it.
Reported-by: Pavan Deolasee
Author: Amit Khandekar, with minor changes by me
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila and Alvaro Herrera
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fRbEzDqdeDq1jxqZUb47kJn+tQ7=Bcgjc8quqKsDViKQ@mail.gmail.com
WAL senders sending logically-decoded data fail to properly report in
"streaming" state when starting up, hence as long as one extra record is
not replayed, such WAL senders would remain in a "catchup" state, which
is inconsistent with the physical cousin.
This can be easily reproduced by for example using pg_recvlogical and
restarting the upstream server. The TAP tests have been slightly
modified to detect the failure and strengthened so as future tests also
make sure that a node is in streaming state when waiting for its
catchup.
Backpatch down to 9.4 where this code has been introduced.
Reported-by: Sawada Masahiko
Author: Simon Riggs, Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek, Michael Paquier, Vaishnavi Prabakaran
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoB2ZbCCqOx=bgKMcLrAvs1V0ZMqzs7wBTuDySezTGtMZA@mail.gmail.com
We should only run apply_pathtarget_labeling_to_tlist if CP_LABEL_TLIST
was specified, because only in that case has use_physical_tlist checked
that the labeling will succeed; otherwise we may get an "ORDER/GROUP BY
expression not found in targetlist" error. (This subsumes the previous
test about gating_clauses, because we reset "flags" to zero earlier
if there are gating clauses to apply.)
The only known case in which a failure can occur is with a ProjectSet
path directly atop a table scan path, although it seems likely that there
are other cases or will be such in future. This means that the failure
is currently only visible in the v10 branch: 9.6 didn't have ProjectSet,
while in v11 and HEAD, apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths for some weird
reason is using create_projection_path not apply_projection_to_path,
masking the problem because there's a ProjectionPath in between.
Nonetheless this code is clearly wrong on its own terms, so back-patch
to 9.6 where this logic was introduced.
Per report from Regina Obe.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/001501d40f88$75186950$5f493bf0$@pcorp.us
nodeWindowAgg.c failed to cope with the possibility that no ordering
columns are defined in the window frame for GROUPS mode or RANGE OFFSET
mode, leading to assertion failures or odd errors, as reported by Masahiko
Sawada and Lukas Eder. In RANGE OFFSET mode, an ordering column is really
required, so add an Assert about that. In GROUPS mode, the code would
work, except that the node initialization code wasn't in sync with the
execution code about when to set up tuplestore read pointers and spare
slots. Fix the latter for consistency's sake (even though I think the
changes described below make the out-of-sync cases unreachable for now).
Per SQL spec, a single ordering column is required for RANGE OFFSET mode,
and at least one ordering column is required for GROUPS mode. The parser
enforced the former but not the latter; add a check for that.
We were able to reach the no-ordering-column cases even with fully spec
compliant queries, though, because the planner would drop partitioning
and ordering columns from the generated plan if they were redundant with
earlier columns according to the redundant-pathkey logic, for instance
"PARTITION BY x ORDER BY y" in the presence of a "WHERE x=y" qual.
While in principle that's an optimization that could save some pointless
comparisons at runtime, it seems unlikely to be meaningful in the real
world. I think this behavior was not so much an intentional optimization
as a side-effect of an ancient decision to construct the plan node's
ordering-column info by reverse-engineering the PathKeys of the input
path. If we give up redundant-column removal then it takes very little
code to generate the plan node info directly from the WindowClause,
ensuring that we have the expected number of ordering columns in all
cases. (If anyone does complain about this, the planner could perhaps
be taught to remove redundant columns only when it's safe to do so,
ie *not* in RANGE OFFSET mode. But I doubt anyone ever will.)
With these changes, the WindowAggPath.winpathkeys field is not used for
anything anymore, so remove it.
The test cases added here are not actually very interesting given the
removal of the redundant-column-removal logic, but they would represent
important corner cases if anyone ever tries to put that back.
Tom Lane and Masahiko Sawada. Back-patch to v11 where RANGE OFFSET
and GROUPS modes were added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDrWqycq-w_+Bx1cjc+YUhZ11XTj9rfxNiNDojjBx8Fjw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153086788677.17476.8002640580496698831@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Such replication slots are physical slots freshly created without WAL
being reserved, which is the default behavior, which have not been used
yet as WAL consumption resources to retain WAL. This prevents advancing
a slot to a position older than any WAL available, which could falsify
calculations for WAL segment recycling.
This also cleans up a bit the code, as ReplicationSlotRelease() would be
called on ERROR, and improves error messages.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Álvaro Herrera, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180626071305.GH31353@paquier.xyz
We fail to handle polymorphic types properly when they are used as
partition keys: we were unnecessarily adding a RelabelType node on top,
which confuses code examining the nodes. In particular, this makes
predtest.c-based partition pruning not to work, and ruleutils.c to emit
expressions that are uglier than needed. Fix it by not adding RelabelType
when not needed.
In master/11 the new pruning code is separate so it doesn't suffer from
this problem, since we already fixed it (in essentially the same way) in
e5dcbb88a1, which also added a few tests; back-patch those tests to
pg10 also. But since UPDATE/DELETE still uses predtest.c in pg11, this
change improves partitioning for those cases too. Add tests for this.
The ruleutils.c behavior change is relevant in pg11/master too.
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/54745d13-7ed4-54ac-97d8-ea1eec95ae25@lab.ntt.co.jp
Commit fafa374f2 caused _bt_getbuf() to possibly emit a WAL record for
a page that it was about to recycle. However, it failed to distinguish
all-zero pages from dead pages, which is important because only the
latter have valid btpo.xact values, or indeed any special space at all.
Recycling an all-zero page with XLogStandbyInfoActive() enabled therefore
led to an Assert failure, or to emission of a WAL record containing a
bogus cutoff XID, which might lead to unnecessary query cancellations
on hot standby servers.
Per reports from Antonin Houska and 自己. Amit Kapila was first to
propose this fix, and Robert Haas, myself, and Kyotaro Horiguchi
reviewed it at various times.
This is an old bug, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2628.1474272158@localhost
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/48875502.f4a0.1635f0c27b0.Coremail.zoulx1982@163.com
Commit 716ea626a attempted to fix the problem of building 1-D zero-size
arrays once and for all. But it turns out that contrib/intarray has some
code that doesn't use construct_array() but just builds arrays by hand,
so it didn't get the memo. This appears to affect all of subarray(),
intset_subtract(), inner_int_union(), inner_int_inter(), and
intarray_concat_arrays().
Back-patch into v11. In the past we've not back-patched this type of
change, but since v11 is still in beta it seems all right to include
this fix in it. Besides it's more consistent to make the fix in v11
where 716ea626a appeared.
Report and patch by Alexey Kryuchkov, some cosmetic adjustments by me
Report: https://postgr.es/m/153053285112.13258.434620894305716755@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN85JcYphDLYt4CpMDLZjjNVqGDrFJ5eS3YF=wLAhFoDQuBsyg@mail.gmail.com
A critical failure in some of the end-of-recovery actions before the
end-of-recovery record is written can cause PostgreSQL to react
inconsistently with the rest of the cluster in the event of a crash
before the final record is written. Two such failures are for example
an error while processing a two-phase state files or when operating on
recovery.conf. With this commit, the failures are still considered
FATAL, but the write of the timeline history file is delayed as much as
possible so as the window between the moment the file is written and the
end-of-recovery record is generated gets minimized. This way, in the
event of a crash or a failure, the new timeline decided at promotion
will not seem taken by other nodes in the cluster. It is not really
possible to reduce to zero this window, hence one could still see
failures if a crash happens between the history file write and the
end-of-recovery record, so any future code should be careful when
adding new end-of-recovery actions. The original report from Magnus
Hagander mentioned a renamed recovery.conf as original end-of-recovery
failure which caused a timeline to be seen as taken but the subsequent
processing on the now-missing recovery.conf cause the startup process to
issue stop on FATAL, which at follow-up startup made the system
inconsistent because of on-disk changes which already happened.
Processing of two-phase state files still needs some work as corrupted
entries are simply ignored now. This is left as a future item and this
commit fixes the original complain.
Reported-by: Magnus Hagander
Author: Heikki Linnakangas
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov, Michael Paquier, David Steele
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevEz09XY2EevA2dLjPCY-C5UO4Hq=XxmXLmF6ipNFecbShQ@mail.gmail.com
While we probably don't want to split up all error messages into
function and procedure variants, this one is a very prominent one, so
it's helpful to be more specific here.
When performing pg_rewind, the presence of a read-only file which is not
accessible for writes will cause a failure while processing. This can
cause the control file of the target data folder to be truncated,
causing it to not be reusable with a successive run.
Also, when pg_rewind fails mid-flight, there is likely no way to be able
to recover the target data folder anyway, in which case a new base
backup is the best option. A note is added in the documentation as
well about.
Reported-by: Christian H.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180104200633.17004.16377%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
When executing CALL in PL/pgSQL, we need to set a snapshot before
invoking the to-be-called procedure. Otherwise, the to-be-called
procedure might end up running without a snapshot. For LANGUAGE SQL
procedures, this would result in an assertion failure. (For most other
languages, this is usually not a problem, because those use SPI and SPI
sets snapshots in most cases.) Setting the snapshot restores the
behavior of how CALL worked when it was handled as a generic SQL
statement in PL/pgSQL (exec_stmt_execsql()).
This change revealed another problem: In SPI_commit(), we popped the
active snapshot before committing the transaction, to avoid "snapshot %p
still active" errors. However, there is no particular reason why only
at most one snapshot should be on the stack. So change this to pop all
active snapshots instead of only one.
Starting with commit 9915de6c1c, replication slot drop uses a
condition variable sleep to wait until the current user of the slot goes
away. This is more user friendly than the previous behavior of erroring
out if the slot is in use, but it fails with a not-for-user-consumption
error message in single-user mode; plus, if you're using single-user
mode because you don't want to start the server in the regular mode
(say, disk is full and WAL won't recycle because of the slot), it's
inconvenient.
Fix by skipping the cond variable sleep in single-user mode, since
there can't be anybody to wait for anyway.
Reported-by: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3b2f809f-326c-38dd-7a9e-897f957a4eb1@enterprisedb.com
Prefer to use phrases like "child" instead of "partition" when
describing the legacy inheritance-based partitioning. The word
"partition" now has a fixed meaning for the built-in partitioning, so
keeping it out of the documentation of the old method makes things
clearer.
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Committer: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Backpatch of: 0c06534bd6
Coverity complains that there is no protection in the code (at least in
non-assertion-enabled builds) against speculative insertion failing to
follow the expected protocol. Add an elog(ERROR) for the case.
Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera
Heikki Linnakangas
Michael Paquier
Robert Haas
Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian
Amit Kapila