or view that's been dropped and then recreated with the same name (but,
perhaps, different columns). Eventually we'd like to support this but
for now all we can do is fail cleanly, rather than possibly coredumping
if we proceed using the obsolete rule.
to specific base or join RelOptInfo nodes during planning. This preserves
the more-intuitive behavior of 7.0.* --- if you write an expensive clause
(such as a sub-select) last, it should get evaluated last. Someday we
ought to try to have some intelligence about the order of evaluation of
WHERE clauses, but for now we should not override what the user wrote.
only possible failure is in pq_flush, which will log a (better!) report
anyway --- so pq_endmessage is just cluttering the log with a redundant
entry. This matters when a client crashes partway through a large query,
since we will emit many broken-pipe reports before finishing the query
and exiting.
lists should be reverse-compiled into targetlist index numbers, because
that's the only interpretation the parser allows for a constant in these
clauses. (Ergo, the only way they could have gotten into the list in
the first place is to have come from the targetlist; so this should always
work.) Per problem report from Peter E.
join clauses. The mergejoin executor wants all the join clauses to appear
as merge quals, not as extra joinquals, for these kinds of joins. But the
planner would consider plans in which partially-sorted input paths were
used, leading to only some of the join clauses becoming merge quals.
This is fine for inner/left joins, not fine for right/full joins.
Although it was now using the right equation, it was making bogus choices
of the precision to compute intermediate results to. I'm not sure this
is really right even yet, but it's better than before ...
should have been done
generate a new Changelog from rc4, which is nice and short ... one python
interface change
tag configure as 7.1, for generating the packages ...
This is it folks ... Release 7.1 is officially here ...
(which failed miserably during DST) to just compare against a time
derived from a timestamp value.
Certainly not a direct check for a correct result, but should work
at any time of year.
it needs to ensure that data structures attached to fmgr info records in
the trees will stick around that long, too. Current code was crashing
on cases like datatypes with old-style I/O functions.
Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian
Hiroshi Inoue
Tatsuo Ishii
Peter Eisentraut
Philip Warner
Marc G. Fournier
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Thomas G. Lockhart
Vadim B. Mikheev
Michael Meskes