Index: doc/src/FAQ/FAQ_DEV.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ_DEV.html,v
retrieving revision 1.107
diff -c -r1.107 FAQ_DEV.html
*** doc/src/FAQ/FAQ_DEV.html 24 Dec 2005 19:29:38 -0000 1.107
--- doc/src/FAQ/FAQ_DEV.html 16 Feb 2006 20:08:51 -0000
***************
*** 156,180 ****
1.5) I've developed a patch, what next?
! Generate the patch in contextual diff format. If you are
! unfamiliar with this, you might find the script
! src/tools/makediff/difforig useful. Unified diffs are
! only preferrable if the file changes are single-line changes and
! do not rely on the surrounding lines.
!
! Ensure that your patch is generated against the most recent
! version of the code. If it is a patch adding new functionality, the
! most recent version is CVS HEAD; if it is a bug fix, this will be
! the most recently version of the branch which suffers from the bug
! (for more on branches in PostgreSQL, see 1.15).
!
! Finally, submit the patch to pgsql-patches@postgresql.org. It
will be reviewed by other contributors to the project and will be
! either accepted or sent back for further work. Also, please try to
! include documentation changes as part of the patch. If you can't do
! that, let us know and we will manually update the documentation when
! the patch is applied.
1.6) Where can I learn more about the
code?
--- 156,231 ----
1.5) I've developed a patch, what next?
! You will need to submit the patch to pgsql-patches@postgresql.org. It
will be reviewed by other contributors to the project and will be
! either accepted or sent back for further work. To help ensure your patch
! is reviewed and committed in a timely fasion, please try to make sure your
! submission conforms to the following guidelines:
!
! - Has the patch been discussed previously? If it has, give a direct link
! to the message and/or bug# from the mail archives
! (http://archives.postgresql.org/).
! If it has not and the patch is of any complexity it is strongly
! recommended you post a message to the appropriate list or you risk
! getting your patch rejected. Refer back to 1.4 for
! email guidelines.
!
! - Ensure that your patch is generated against the most recent version
! of the code, which for developers is CVS HEAD. For more on branches in
! PostgreSQL, see 1.15.
!
! - Try to make your patch as readable as possible. Try to follow the
! project's code-layout conventions; again, this makes it easier for the
! reviewer, and there's no point in trying to do it
! differently than pgindent. Also avoid unnecessary whitespace
! changes, they just distract the reviewer, and your formatting changes
! will probably not survive the next pgindent run anyway.
!
! - The patch should be generated in contextual diff format and should
! be applicable from the root directory. If you are unfamiliar with
! this, you might find the script src/tools/makediff/difforig
! useful.
!
! - PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license, so any submissions must
! conform to the BSD license to be included. If you use code that is
! available under some other license that is BSD compatible (eg. public
! domain) please note that code in your email submission
!
! - Confirm that your changes can pass the regression tests and list the
! platforms you have tested this on. If your changes are port specific,
! list the ports that it applies to.
!
! - Provide an implementation overview, preferably in code comments.
!
! - If it is a performance patch, provide confirming test results to
! show the benefits of your patch. It is OK to post patches without
! this information, though the patch will not be applied until *somebody*
! has tested the patches and found a valuable performance effect directly
! attributable to the patch. Given that writing performance tests is not
! terribly exciting, it is recommended you take this task upon yourself.
!
! - If it is a new feature patch, confirm that it has been tested for
! all desired scenarios. If it has not, this should be clearly stated as
! a request for a particular kind of test to be performed. Note that the
! patch will go no further until that test has been performed.
!
! - New feature patches should also be accompanied by doc patches, and
! pointers to any relevant sections of the SQL standard are recommended
! as well. See 1.16 for more information on the
! SQL standards.
!
! - If your patch changes any existing defaults, you will need to
! explain why this is *required* or the patch will likely be rejected.
!
!
! Even if you pass all of the above, the patch may still be rejected
! for other technical reasons. You should be prepared to listen to
! comments received and perform any agreed rework. Even if you have
! received positive comments from some community members, others may spot
! problems with your approach, coding style or many other issues.
!
! Successful patches will be notified to you by email and you will be
! credited for that work in the next set of release notes.
1.6) Where can I learn more about the
code?