/*------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * nbtxlog.h * header file for postgres btree xlog routines * * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2022, PostgreSQL Global Development Group * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California * * src/include/access/nbtxlog.h * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ #ifndef NBTXLOG_H #define NBTXLOG_H #include "access/transam.h" #include "access/xlogreader.h" #include "lib/stringinfo.h" #include "storage/off.h" /* * XLOG records for btree operations * * XLOG allows to store some information in high 4 bits of log * record xl_info field */ #define XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_LEAF 0x00 /* add index tuple without split */ #define XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_UPPER 0x10 /* same, on a non-leaf page */ #define XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_META 0x20 /* same, plus update metapage */ #define XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L 0x30 /* add index tuple with split */ #define XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R 0x40 /* as above, new item on right */ #define XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_POST 0x50 /* add index tuple with posting split */ #define XLOG_BTREE_DEDUP 0x60 /* deduplicate tuples for a page */ #define XLOG_BTREE_DELETE 0x70 /* delete leaf index tuples for a page */ #define XLOG_BTREE_UNLINK_PAGE 0x80 /* delete a half-dead page */ #define XLOG_BTREE_UNLINK_PAGE_META 0x90 /* same, and update metapage */ #define XLOG_BTREE_NEWROOT 0xA0 /* new root page */ #define XLOG_BTREE_MARK_PAGE_HALFDEAD 0xB0 /* mark a leaf as half-dead */ #define XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM 0xC0 /* delete entries on a page during * vacuum */ #define XLOG_BTREE_REUSE_PAGE 0xD0 /* old page is about to be reused from * FSM */ #define XLOG_BTREE_META_CLEANUP 0xE0 /* update cleanup-related data in the * metapage */ /* * All that we need to regenerate the meta-data page */ typedef struct xl_btree_metadata { uint32 version; BlockNumber root; uint32 level; BlockNumber fastroot; uint32 fastlevel; uint32 last_cleanup_num_delpages; bool allequalimage; } xl_btree_metadata; /* * This is what we need to know about simple (without split) insert. * * This data record is used for INSERT_LEAF, INSERT_UPPER, INSERT_META, and * INSERT_POST. Note that INSERT_META and INSERT_UPPER implies it's not a * leaf page, while INSERT_POST and INSERT_LEAF imply that it must be a leaf * page. * * Backup Blk 0: original page * Backup Blk 1: child's left sibling, if INSERT_UPPER or INSERT_META * Backup Blk 2: xl_btree_metadata, if INSERT_META * * Note: The new tuple is actually the "original" new item in the posting * list split insert case (i.e. the INSERT_POST case). A split offset for * the posting list is logged before the original new item. Recovery needs * both, since it must do an in-place update of the existing posting list * that was split as an extra step. Also, recovery generates a "final" * newitem. See _bt_swap_posting() for details on posting list splits. */ typedef struct xl_btree_insert { OffsetNumber offnum; /* POSTING SPLIT OFFSET FOLLOWS (INSERT_POST case) */ /* NEW TUPLE ALWAYS FOLLOWS AT THE END */ } xl_btree_insert; #define SizeOfBtreeInsert (offsetof(xl_btree_insert, offnum) + sizeof(OffsetNumber)) /* * On insert with split, we save all the items going into the right sibling * so that we can restore it completely from the log record. This way takes * less xlog space than the normal approach, because if we did it standardly, * XLogInsert would almost always think the right page is new and store its * whole page image. The left page, however, is handled in the normal * incremental-update fashion. * * Note: XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L and XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R share this data record. * There are two variants to indicate whether the inserted tuple went into the * left or right split page (and thus, whether the new item is stored or not). * We always log the left page high key because suffix truncation can generate * a new leaf high key using user-defined code. This is also necessary on * internal pages, since the firstright item that the left page's high key was * based on will have been truncated to zero attributes in the right page (the * separator key is unavailable from the right page). * * Backup Blk 0: original page / new left page * * The left page's data portion contains the new item, if it's the _L variant. * _R variant split records generally do not have a newitem (_R variant leaf * page split records that must deal with a posting list split will include an * explicit newitem, though it is never used on the right page -- it is * actually an orignewitem needed to update existing posting list). The new * high key of the left/original page appears last of all (and must always be * present). * * Page split records that need the REDO routine to deal with a posting list * split directly will have an explicit newitem, which is actually an * orignewitem (the newitem as it was before the posting list split, not * after). A posting list split always has a newitem that comes immediately * after the posting list being split (which would have overlapped with * orignewitem prior to split). Usually REDO must deal with posting list * splits with an _L variant page split record, and usually both the new * posting list and the final newitem go on the left page (the existing * posting list will be inserted instead of the old, and the final newitem * will be inserted next to that). However, _R variant split records will * include an orignewitem when the split point for the page happens to have a * lastleft tuple that is also the posting list being split (leaving newitem * as the page split's firstright tuple). The existence of this corner case * does not change the basic fact about newitem/orignewitem for the REDO * routine: it is always state used for the left page alone. (This is why the * record's postingoff field isn't a reliable indicator of whether or not a * posting list split occurred during the page split; a non-zero value merely * indicates that the REDO routine must reconstruct a new posting list tuple * that is needed for the left page.) * * This posting list split handling is equivalent to the xl_btree_insert REDO * routine's INSERT_POST handling. While the details are more complicated * here, the concept and goals are exactly the same. See _bt_swap_posting() * for details on posting list splits. * * Backup Blk 1: new right page * * The right page's data portion contains the right page's tuples in the form * used by _bt_restore_page. This includes the new item, if it's the _R * variant. The right page's tuples also include the right page's high key * with either variant (moved from the left/original page during the split), * unless the split happened to be of the rightmost page on its level, where * there is no high key for new right page. * * Backup Blk 2: next block (orig page's rightlink), if any * Backup Blk 3: child's left sibling, if non-leaf split */ typedef struct xl_btree_split { uint32 level; /* tree level of page being split */ OffsetNumber firstrightoff; /* first origpage item on rightpage */ OffsetNumber newitemoff; /* new item's offset */ uint16 postingoff; /* offset inside orig posting tuple */ } xl_btree_split; #define SizeOfBtreeSplit (offsetof(xl_btree_split, postingoff) + sizeof(uint16)) /* * When page is deduplicated, consecutive groups of tuples with equal keys are * merged together into posting list tuples. * * The WAL record represents a deduplication pass for a leaf page. An array * of BTDedupInterval structs follows. */ typedef struct xl_btree_dedup { uint16 nintervals; /* DEDUPLICATION INTERVALS FOLLOW */ } xl_btree_dedup; #define SizeOfBtreeDedup (offsetof(xl_btree_dedup, nintervals) + sizeof(uint16)) /* * This is what we need to know about page reuse within btree. This record * only exists to generate a conflict point for Hot Standby. * * Note that we must include a RelFileLocator in the record because we don't * actually register the buffer with the record. */ typedef struct xl_btree_reuse_page { RelFileLocator locator; BlockNumber block; FullTransactionId latestRemovedFullXid; } xl_btree_reuse_page; #define SizeOfBtreeReusePage (sizeof(xl_btree_reuse_page)) /* * xl_btree_vacuum and xl_btree_delete records describe deletion of index * tuples on a leaf page. The former variant is used by VACUUM, while the * latter variant is used by the ad-hoc deletions that sometimes take place * when btinsert() is called. * * The records are very similar. The only difference is that xl_btree_delete * has to include a latestRemovedXid field to generate recovery conflicts. * (VACUUM operations can just rely on earlier conflicts generated during * pruning of the table whose TIDs the to-be-deleted index tuples point to. * There are also small differences between each REDO routine that we don't go * into here.) * * xl_btree_vacuum and xl_btree_delete both represent deletion of any number * of index tuples on a single leaf page using page offset numbers. Both also * support "updates" of index tuples, which is how deletes of a subset of TIDs * contained in an existing posting list tuple are implemented. * * Updated posting list tuples are represented using xl_btree_update metadata. * The REDO routines each use the xl_btree_update entries (plus each * corresponding original index tuple from the target leaf page) to generate * the final updated tuple. * * Updates are only used when there will be some remaining TIDs left by the * REDO routine. Otherwise the posting list tuple just gets deleted outright. */ typedef struct xl_btree_vacuum { uint16 ndeleted; uint16 nupdated; /* DELETED TARGET OFFSET NUMBERS FOLLOW */ /* UPDATED TARGET OFFSET NUMBERS FOLLOW */ /* UPDATED TUPLES METADATA (xl_btree_update) ARRAY FOLLOWS */ } xl_btree_vacuum; #define SizeOfBtreeVacuum (offsetof(xl_btree_vacuum, nupdated) + sizeof(uint16)) typedef struct xl_btree_delete { TransactionId latestRemovedXid; uint16 ndeleted; uint16 nupdated; /* DELETED TARGET OFFSET NUMBERS FOLLOW */ /* UPDATED TARGET OFFSET NUMBERS FOLLOW */ /* UPDATED TUPLES METADATA (xl_btree_update) ARRAY FOLLOWS */ } xl_btree_delete; #define SizeOfBtreeDelete (offsetof(xl_btree_delete, nupdated) + sizeof(uint16)) /* * The offsets that appear in xl_btree_update metadata are offsets into the * original posting list from tuple, not page offset numbers. These are * 0-based. The page offset number for the original posting list tuple comes * from the main xl_btree_vacuum/xl_btree_delete record. */ typedef struct xl_btree_update { uint16 ndeletedtids; /* POSTING LIST uint16 OFFSETS TO A DELETED TID FOLLOW */ } xl_btree_update; #define SizeOfBtreeUpdate (offsetof(xl_btree_update, ndeletedtids) + sizeof(uint16)) /* * This is what we need to know about marking an empty subtree for deletion. * The target identifies the tuple removed from the parent page (note that we * remove this tuple's downlink and the *following* tuple's key). Note that * the leaf page is empty, so we don't need to store its content --- it is * just reinitialized during recovery using the rest of the fields. * * Backup Blk 0: leaf block * Backup Blk 1: top parent */ typedef struct xl_btree_mark_page_halfdead { OffsetNumber poffset; /* deleted tuple id in parent page */ /* information needed to recreate the leaf page: */ BlockNumber leafblk; /* leaf block ultimately being deleted */ BlockNumber leftblk; /* leaf block's left sibling, if any */ BlockNumber rightblk; /* leaf block's right sibling */ BlockNumber topparent; /* topmost internal page in the subtree */ } xl_btree_mark_page_halfdead; #define SizeOfBtreeMarkPageHalfDead (offsetof(xl_btree_mark_page_halfdead, topparent) + sizeof(BlockNumber)) /* * This is what we need to know about deletion of a btree page. Note that we * only leave behind a small amount of bookkeeping information in deleted * pages (deleted pages must be kept around as tombstones for a while). It is * convenient for the REDO routine to regenerate its target page from scratch. * This is why WAL record describes certain details that are actually directly * available from the target page. * * Backup Blk 0: target block being deleted * Backup Blk 1: target block's left sibling, if any * Backup Blk 2: target block's right sibling * Backup Blk 3: leaf block (if different from target) * Backup Blk 4: metapage (if rightsib becomes new fast root) */ typedef struct xl_btree_unlink_page { BlockNumber leftsib; /* target block's left sibling, if any */ BlockNumber rightsib; /* target block's right sibling */ uint32 level; /* target block's level */ FullTransactionId safexid; /* target block's BTPageSetDeleted() XID */ /* * Information needed to recreate a half-dead leaf page with correct * topparent link. The fields are only used when deletion operation's * target page is an internal page. REDO routine creates half-dead page * from scratch to keep things simple (this is the same convenient * approach used for the target page itself). */ BlockNumber leafleftsib; BlockNumber leafrightsib; BlockNumber leaftopparent; /* next child down in the subtree */ /* xl_btree_metadata FOLLOWS IF XLOG_BTREE_UNLINK_PAGE_META */ } xl_btree_unlink_page; #define SizeOfBtreeUnlinkPage (offsetof(xl_btree_unlink_page, leaftopparent) + sizeof(BlockNumber)) /* * New root log record. There are zero tuples if this is to establish an * empty root, or two if it is the result of splitting an old root. * * Note that although this implies rewriting the metadata page, we don't need * an xl_btree_metadata record --- the rootblk and level are sufficient. * * Backup Blk 0: new root page (2 tuples as payload, if splitting old root) * Backup Blk 1: left child (if splitting an old root) * Backup Blk 2: metapage */ typedef struct xl_btree_newroot { BlockNumber rootblk; /* location of new root (redundant with blk 0) */ uint32 level; /* its tree level */ } xl_btree_newroot; #define SizeOfBtreeNewroot (offsetof(xl_btree_newroot, level) + sizeof(uint32)) /* * prototypes for functions in nbtxlog.c */ extern void btree_redo(XLogReaderState *record); extern void btree_xlog_startup(void); extern void btree_xlog_cleanup(void); extern void btree_mask(char *pagedata, BlockNumber blkno); /* * prototypes for functions in nbtdesc.c */ extern void btree_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record); extern const char *btree_identify(uint8 info); #endif /* NBTXLOG_H */