Don't think that the context "UPDATE tab SET var =" is a GUC-setting
command.
If we have "SET var =" but the "var" is not a known GUC variable,
don't offer any completions. The most likely explanation is that
we've misparsed the context and it's not really a GUC-setting command.
Per gripe from Ken Tanzer. Back-patch to 9.6. The issue exists
further back, but before 9.6 the code looks very different and it
doesn't actually know whether the "var" name matches anything,
so I desisted from trying to fix it.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD3a31XpXzrZA9TT3BqLSHghdTK+=cXjNCE+oL2Zn4+oWoc=qA@mail.gmail.com
0ec3e13c69