postgresql/src/common/keywords.c
Tom Lane c7b8998ebb Phase 2 of pgindent updates.
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.

Commit e3860ffa4d wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code.  The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there.  BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs.  So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before.  This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.

Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.

This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 15:19:25 -04:00

115 lines
2.7 KiB
C

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* keywords.c
* lexical token lookup for key words in PostgreSQL
*
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* src/common/keywords.c
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#ifndef FRONTEND
#include "postgres.h"
#else
#include "postgres_fe.h"
#endif
#ifndef FRONTEND
#include "parser/gramparse.h"
#define PG_KEYWORD(a,b,c) {a,b,c},
#else
#include "common/keywords.h"
/*
* We don't need the token number for frontend uses, so leave it out to avoid
* requiring backend headers that won't compile cleanly here.
*/
#define PG_KEYWORD(a,b,c) {a,0,c},
#endif /* FRONTEND */
const ScanKeyword ScanKeywords[] = {
#include "parser/kwlist.h"
};
const int NumScanKeywords = lengthof(ScanKeywords);
/*
* ScanKeywordLookup - see if a given word is a keyword
*
* The table to be searched is passed explicitly, so that this can be used
* to search keyword lists other than the standard list appearing above.
*
* Returns a pointer to the ScanKeyword table entry, or NULL if no match.
*
* The match is done case-insensitively. Note that we deliberately use a
* dumbed-down case conversion that will only translate 'A'-'Z' into 'a'-'z',
* even if we are in a locale where tolower() would produce more or different
* translations. This is to conform to the SQL99 spec, which says that
* keywords are to be matched in this way even though non-keyword identifiers
* receive a different case-normalization mapping.
*/
const ScanKeyword *
ScanKeywordLookup(const char *text,
const ScanKeyword *keywords,
int num_keywords)
{
int len,
i;
char word[NAMEDATALEN];
const ScanKeyword *low;
const ScanKeyword *high;
len = strlen(text);
/* We assume all keywords are shorter than NAMEDATALEN. */
if (len >= NAMEDATALEN)
return NULL;
/*
* Apply an ASCII-only downcasing. We must not use tolower() since it may
* produce the wrong translation in some locales (eg, Turkish).
*/
for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
{
char ch = text[i];
if (ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'Z')
ch += 'a' - 'A';
word[i] = ch;
}
word[len] = '\0';
/*
* Now do a binary search using plain strcmp() comparison.
*/
low = keywords;
high = keywords + (num_keywords - 1);
while (low <= high)
{
const ScanKeyword *middle;
int difference;
middle = low + (high - low) / 2;
difference = strcmp(middle->name, word);
if (difference == 0)
return middle;
else if (difference < 0)
low = middle + 1;
else
high = middle - 1;
}
return NULL;
}