postgresql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c

840 lines
27 KiB
C

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* analyzejoins.c
* Routines for simplifying joins after initial query analysis
*
* While we do a great deal of join simplification in prep/prepjointree.c,
* certain optimizations cannot be performed at that stage for lack of
* detailed information about the query. The routines here are invoked
* after initsplan.c has done its work, and can do additional join removal
* and simplification steps based on the information extracted. The penalty
* is that we have to work harder to clean up after ourselves when we modify
* the query, since the derived data structures have to be updated too.
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2016, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#include "postgres.h"
#include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h"
#include "optimizer/clauses.h"
#include "optimizer/joininfo.h"
#include "optimizer/pathnode.h"
#include "optimizer/paths.h"
#include "optimizer/planmain.h"
#include "optimizer/tlist.h"
#include "optimizer/var.h"
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
/* local functions */
static bool join_is_removable(PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo);
static void remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid,
Relids joinrelids);
static List *remove_rel_from_joinlist(List *joinlist, int relid, int *nremoved);
static bool rel_supports_distinctness(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel);
static bool rel_is_distinct_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
List *clause_list);
static Oid distinct_col_search(int colno, List *colnos, List *opids);
/*
* remove_useless_joins
* Check for relations that don't actually need to be joined at all,
* and remove them from the query.
*
* We are passed the current joinlist and return the updated list. Other
* data structures that have to be updated are accessible via "root".
*/
List *
remove_useless_joins(PlannerInfo *root, List *joinlist)
{
ListCell *lc;
/*
* We are only interested in relations that are left-joined to, so we can
* scan the join_info_list to find them easily.
*/
restart:
foreach(lc, root->join_info_list)
{
SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo = (SpecialJoinInfo *) lfirst(lc);
int innerrelid;
int nremoved;
/* Skip if not removable */
if (!join_is_removable(root, sjinfo))
continue;
/*
* Currently, join_is_removable can only succeed when the sjinfo's
* righthand is a single baserel. Remove that rel from the query and
* joinlist.
*/
innerrelid = bms_singleton_member(sjinfo->min_righthand);
remove_rel_from_query(root, innerrelid,
bms_union(sjinfo->min_lefthand,
sjinfo->min_righthand));
/* We verify that exactly one reference gets removed from joinlist */
nremoved = 0;
joinlist = remove_rel_from_joinlist(joinlist, innerrelid, &nremoved);
if (nremoved != 1)
elog(ERROR, "failed to find relation %d in joinlist", innerrelid);
/*
* We can delete this SpecialJoinInfo from the list too, since it's no
* longer of interest.
*/
root->join_info_list = list_delete_ptr(root->join_info_list, sjinfo);
/*
* Restart the scan. This is necessary to ensure we find all
* removable joins independently of ordering of the join_info_list
* (note that removal of attr_needed bits may make a join appear
* removable that did not before). Also, since we just deleted the
* current list cell, we'd have to have some kluge to continue the
* list scan anyway.
*/
goto restart;
}
return joinlist;
}
/*
* clause_sides_match_join
* Determine whether a join clause is of the right form to use in this join.
*
* We already know that the clause is a binary opclause referencing only the
* rels in the current join. The point here is to check whether it has the
* form "outerrel_expr op innerrel_expr" or "innerrel_expr op outerrel_expr",
* rather than mixing outer and inner vars on either side. If it matches,
* we set the transient flag outer_is_left to identify which side is which.
*/
static inline bool
clause_sides_match_join(RestrictInfo *rinfo, Relids outerrelids,
Relids innerrelids)
{
if (bms_is_subset(rinfo->left_relids, outerrelids) &&
bms_is_subset(rinfo->right_relids, innerrelids))
{
/* lefthand side is outer */
rinfo->outer_is_left = true;
return true;
}
else if (bms_is_subset(rinfo->left_relids, innerrelids) &&
bms_is_subset(rinfo->right_relids, outerrelids))
{
/* righthand side is outer */
rinfo->outer_is_left = false;
return true;
}
return false; /* no good for these input relations */
}
/*
* join_is_removable
* Check whether we need not perform this special join at all, because
* it will just duplicate its left input.
*
* This is true for a left join for which the join condition cannot match
* more than one inner-side row. (There are other possibly interesting
* cases, but we don't have the infrastructure to prove them.) We also
* have to check that the inner side doesn't generate any variables needed
* above the join.
*/
static bool
join_is_removable(PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo)
{
int innerrelid;
RelOptInfo *innerrel;
Relids joinrelids;
List *clause_list = NIL;
ListCell *l;
int attroff;
/*
* Must be a non-delaying left join to a single baserel, else we aren't
* going to be able to do anything with it.
*/
if (sjinfo->jointype != JOIN_LEFT ||
sjinfo->delay_upper_joins)
return false;
if (!bms_get_singleton_member(sjinfo->min_righthand, &innerrelid))
return false;
innerrel = find_base_rel(root, innerrelid);
/*
* Before we go to the effort of checking whether any innerrel variables
* are needed above the join, make a quick check to eliminate cases in
* which we will surely be unable to prove uniqueness of the innerrel.
*/
if (!rel_supports_distinctness(root, innerrel))
return false;
/* Compute the relid set for the join we are considering */
joinrelids = bms_union(sjinfo->min_lefthand, sjinfo->min_righthand);
/*
* We can't remove the join if any inner-rel attributes are used above the
* join.
*
* Note that this test only detects use of inner-rel attributes in higher
* join conditions and the target list. There might be such attributes in
* pushed-down conditions at this join, too. We check that case below.
*
* As a micro-optimization, it seems better to start with max_attr and
* count down rather than starting with min_attr and counting up, on the
* theory that the system attributes are somewhat less likely to be wanted
* and should be tested last.
*/
for (attroff = innerrel->max_attr - innerrel->min_attr;
attroff >= 0;
attroff--)
{
if (!bms_is_subset(innerrel->attr_needed[attroff], joinrelids))
return false;
}
/*
* Similarly check that the inner rel isn't needed by any PlaceHolderVars
* that will be used above the join. We only need to fail if such a PHV
* actually references some inner-rel attributes; but the correct check
* for that is relatively expensive, so we first check against ph_eval_at,
* which must mention the inner rel if the PHV uses any inner-rel attrs as
* non-lateral references. Note that if the PHV's syntactic scope is just
* the inner rel, we can't drop the rel even if the PHV is variable-free.
*/
foreach(l, root->placeholder_list)
{
PlaceHolderInfo *phinfo = (PlaceHolderInfo *) lfirst(l);
if (bms_overlap(phinfo->ph_lateral, innerrel->relids))
return false; /* it references innerrel laterally */
if (bms_is_subset(phinfo->ph_needed, joinrelids))
continue; /* PHV is not used above the join */
if (!bms_overlap(phinfo->ph_eval_at, innerrel->relids))
continue; /* it definitely doesn't reference innerrel */
if (bms_is_subset(phinfo->ph_eval_at, innerrel->relids))
return false; /* there isn't any other place to eval PHV */
if (bms_overlap(pull_varnos((Node *) phinfo->ph_var->phexpr),
innerrel->relids))
return false; /* it does reference innerrel */
}
/*
* Search for mergejoinable clauses that constrain the inner rel against
* either the outer rel or a pseudoconstant. If an operator is
* mergejoinable then it behaves like equality for some btree opclass, so
* it's what we want. The mergejoinability test also eliminates clauses
* containing volatile functions, which we couldn't depend on.
*/
foreach(l, innerrel->joininfo)
{
RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l);
/*
* If it's not a join clause for this outer join, we can't use it.
* Note that if the clause is pushed-down, then it is logically from
* above the outer join, even if it references no other rels (it might
* be from WHERE, for example).
*/
if (restrictinfo->is_pushed_down ||
!bms_equal(restrictinfo->required_relids, joinrelids))
{
/*
* If such a clause actually references the inner rel then join
* removal has to be disallowed. We have to check this despite
* the previous attr_needed checks because of the possibility of
* pushed-down clauses referencing the rel.
*/
if (bms_is_member(innerrelid, restrictinfo->clause_relids))
return false;
continue; /* else, ignore; not useful here */
}
/* Ignore if it's not a mergejoinable clause */
if (!restrictinfo->can_join ||
restrictinfo->mergeopfamilies == NIL)
continue; /* not mergejoinable */
/*
* Check if clause has the form "outer op inner" or "inner op outer",
* and if so mark which side is inner.
*/
if (!clause_sides_match_join(restrictinfo, sjinfo->min_lefthand,
innerrel->relids))
continue; /* no good for these input relations */
/* OK, add to list */
clause_list = lappend(clause_list, restrictinfo);
}
/*
* Now that we have the relevant equality join clauses, try to prove the
* innerrel distinct.
*/
if (rel_is_distinct_for(root, innerrel, clause_list))
return true;
/*
* Some day it would be nice to check for other methods of establishing
* distinctness.
*/
return false;
}
/*
* Remove the target relid from the planner's data structures, having
* determined that there is no need to include it in the query.
*
* We are not terribly thorough here. We must make sure that the rel is
* no longer treated as a baserel, and that attributes of other baserels
* are no longer marked as being needed at joins involving this rel.
* Also, join quals involving the rel have to be removed from the joininfo
* lists, but only if they belong to the outer join identified by joinrelids.
*/
static void
remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids)
{
RelOptInfo *rel = find_base_rel(root, relid);
List *joininfos;
Index rti;
ListCell *l;
ListCell *nextl;
/*
* Mark the rel as "dead" to show it is no longer part of the join tree.
* (Removing it from the baserel array altogether seems too risky.)
*/
rel->reloptkind = RELOPT_DEADREL;
/*
* Remove references to the rel from other baserels' attr_needed arrays.
*/
for (rti = 1; rti < root->simple_rel_array_size; rti++)
{
RelOptInfo *otherrel = root->simple_rel_array[rti];
int attroff;
/* there may be empty slots corresponding to non-baserel RTEs */
if (otherrel == NULL)
continue;
Assert(otherrel->relid == rti); /* sanity check on array */
/* no point in processing target rel itself */
if (otherrel == rel)
continue;
for (attroff = otherrel->max_attr - otherrel->min_attr;
attroff >= 0;
attroff--)
{
otherrel->attr_needed[attroff] =
bms_del_member(otherrel->attr_needed[attroff], relid);
}
}
/*
* Likewise remove references from SpecialJoinInfo data structures.
*
* This is relevant in case the outer join we're deleting is nested inside
* other outer joins: the upper joins' relid sets have to be adjusted. The
* RHS of the target outer join will be made empty here, but that's OK
* since caller will delete that SpecialJoinInfo entirely.
*/
foreach(l, root->join_info_list)
{
SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo = (SpecialJoinInfo *) lfirst(l);
sjinfo->min_lefthand = bms_del_member(sjinfo->min_lefthand, relid);
sjinfo->min_righthand = bms_del_member(sjinfo->min_righthand, relid);
sjinfo->syn_lefthand = bms_del_member(sjinfo->syn_lefthand, relid);
sjinfo->syn_righthand = bms_del_member(sjinfo->syn_righthand, relid);
}
/*
* Likewise remove references from PlaceHolderVar data structures,
* removing any no-longer-needed placeholders entirely.
*
* Removal is a bit tricker than it might seem: we can remove PHVs that
* are used at the target rel and/or in the join qual, but not those that
* are used at join partner rels or above the join. It's not that easy to
* distinguish PHVs used at partner rels from those used in the join qual,
* since they will both have ph_needed sets that are subsets of
* joinrelids. However, a PHV used at a partner rel could not have the
* target rel in ph_eval_at, so we check that while deciding whether to
* remove or just update the PHV. There is no corresponding test in
* join_is_removable because it doesn't need to distinguish those cases.
*/
for (l = list_head(root->placeholder_list); l != NULL; l = nextl)
{
PlaceHolderInfo *phinfo = (PlaceHolderInfo *) lfirst(l);
nextl = lnext(l);
Assert(!bms_is_member(relid, phinfo->ph_lateral));
if (bms_is_subset(phinfo->ph_needed, joinrelids) &&
bms_is_member(relid, phinfo->ph_eval_at))
root->placeholder_list = list_delete_ptr(root->placeholder_list,
phinfo);
else
{
phinfo->ph_eval_at = bms_del_member(phinfo->ph_eval_at, relid);
Assert(!bms_is_empty(phinfo->ph_eval_at));
phinfo->ph_needed = bms_del_member(phinfo->ph_needed, relid);
}
}
/*
* Remove any joinquals referencing the rel from the joininfo lists.
*
* In some cases, a joinqual has to be put back after deleting its
* reference to the target rel. This can occur for pseudoconstant and
* outerjoin-delayed quals, which can get marked as requiring the rel in
* order to force them to be evaluated at or above the join. We can't
* just discard them, though. Only quals that logically belonged to the
* outer join being discarded should be removed from the query.
*
* We must make a copy of the rel's old joininfo list before starting the
* loop, because otherwise remove_join_clause_from_rels would destroy the
* list while we're scanning it.
*/
joininfos = list_copy(rel->joininfo);
foreach(l, joininfos)
{
RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l);
remove_join_clause_from_rels(root, rinfo, rinfo->required_relids);
if (rinfo->is_pushed_down ||
!bms_equal(rinfo->required_relids, joinrelids))
{
/* Recheck that qual doesn't actually reference the target rel */
Assert(!bms_is_member(relid, rinfo->clause_relids));
/*
* The required_relids probably aren't shared with anything else,
* but let's copy them just to be sure.
*/
rinfo->required_relids = bms_copy(rinfo->required_relids);
rinfo->required_relids = bms_del_member(rinfo->required_relids,
relid);
distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo);
}
}
}
/*
* Remove any occurrences of the target relid from a joinlist structure.
*
* It's easiest to build a whole new list structure, so we handle it that
* way. Efficiency is not a big deal here.
*
* *nremoved is incremented by the number of occurrences removed (there
* should be exactly one, but the caller checks that).
*/
static List *
remove_rel_from_joinlist(List *joinlist, int relid, int *nremoved)
{
List *result = NIL;
ListCell *jl;
foreach(jl, joinlist)
{
Node *jlnode = (Node *) lfirst(jl);
if (IsA(jlnode, RangeTblRef))
{
int varno = ((RangeTblRef *) jlnode)->rtindex;
if (varno == relid)
(*nremoved)++;
else
result = lappend(result, jlnode);
}
else if (IsA(jlnode, List))
{
/* Recurse to handle subproblem */
List *sublist;
sublist = remove_rel_from_joinlist((List *) jlnode,
relid, nremoved);
/* Avoid including empty sub-lists in the result */
if (sublist)
result = lappend(result, sublist);
}
else
{
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized joinlist node type: %d",
(int) nodeTag(jlnode));
}
}
return result;
}
/*
* rel_supports_distinctness
* Could the relation possibly be proven distinct on some set of columns?
*
* This is effectively a pre-checking function for rel_is_distinct_for().
* It must return TRUE if rel_is_distinct_for() could possibly return TRUE
* with this rel, but it should not expend a lot of cycles. The idea is
* that callers can avoid doing possibly-expensive processing to compute
* rel_is_distinct_for()'s argument lists if the call could not possibly
* succeed.
*/
static bool
rel_supports_distinctness(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel)
{
/* We only know about baserels ... */
if (rel->reloptkind != RELOPT_BASEREL)
return false;
if (rel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION)
{
/*
* For a plain relation, we only know how to prove uniqueness by
* reference to unique indexes. Make sure there's at least one
* suitable unique index. It must be immediately enforced, and if
* it's a partial index, it must match the query. (Keep these
* conditions in sync with relation_has_unique_index_for!)
*/
ListCell *lc;
foreach(lc, rel->indexlist)
{
IndexOptInfo *ind = (IndexOptInfo *) lfirst(lc);
if (ind->unique && ind->immediate &&
(ind->indpred == NIL || ind->predOK))
return true;
}
}
else if (rel->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY)
{
Query *subquery = root->simple_rte_array[rel->relid]->subquery;
/* Check if the subquery has any qualities that support distinctness */
if (query_supports_distinctness(subquery))
return true;
}
/* We have no proof rules for any other rtekinds. */
return false;
}
/*
* rel_is_distinct_for
* Does the relation return only distinct rows according to clause_list?
*
* clause_list is a list of join restriction clauses involving this rel and
* some other one. Return true if no two rows emitted by this rel could
* possibly join to the same row of the other rel.
*
* The caller must have already determined that each condition is a
* mergejoinable equality with an expression in this relation on one side, and
* an expression not involving this relation on the other. The transient
* outer_is_left flag is used to identify which side references this relation:
* left side if outer_is_left is false, right side if it is true.
*
* Note that the passed-in clause_list may be destructively modified! This
* is OK for current uses, because the clause_list is built by the caller for
* the sole purpose of passing to this function.
*/
static bool
rel_is_distinct_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, List *clause_list)
{
/*
* We could skip a couple of tests here if we assume all callers checked
* rel_supports_distinctness first, but it doesn't seem worth taking any
* risk for.
*/
if (rel->reloptkind != RELOPT_BASEREL)
return false;
if (rel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION)
{
/*
* Examine the indexes to see if we have a matching unique index.
* relation_has_unique_index_for automatically adds any usable
* restriction clauses for the rel, so we needn't do that here.
*/
if (relation_has_unique_index_for(root, rel, clause_list, NIL, NIL))
return true;
}
else if (rel->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY)
{
Index relid = rel->relid;
Query *subquery = root->simple_rte_array[relid]->subquery;
List *colnos = NIL;
List *opids = NIL;
ListCell *l;
/*
* Build the argument lists for query_is_distinct_for: a list of
* output column numbers that the query needs to be distinct over, and
* a list of equality operators that the output columns need to be
* distinct according to.
*
* (XXX we are not considering restriction clauses attached to the
* subquery; is that worth doing?)
*/
foreach(l, clause_list)
{
RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l);
Oid op;
Var *var;
/*
* Get the equality operator we need uniqueness according to.
* (This might be a cross-type operator and thus not exactly the
* same operator the subquery would consider; that's all right
* since query_is_distinct_for can resolve such cases.) The
* caller's mergejoinability test should have selected only
* OpExprs.
*/
Assert(IsA(rinfo->clause, OpExpr));
op = ((OpExpr *) rinfo->clause)->opno;
/* caller identified the inner side for us */
if (rinfo->outer_is_left)
var = (Var *) get_rightop(rinfo->clause);
else
var = (Var *) get_leftop(rinfo->clause);
/*
* If inner side isn't a Var referencing a subquery output column,
* this clause doesn't help us.
*/
if (!var || !IsA(var, Var) ||
var->varno != relid || var->varlevelsup != 0)
continue;
colnos = lappend_int(colnos, var->varattno);
opids = lappend_oid(opids, op);
}
if (query_is_distinct_for(subquery, colnos, opids))
return true;
}
return false;
}
/*
* query_supports_distinctness - could the query possibly be proven distinct
* on some set of output columns?
*
* This is effectively a pre-checking function for query_is_distinct_for().
* It must return TRUE if query_is_distinct_for() could possibly return TRUE
* with this query, but it should not expend a lot of cycles. The idea is
* that callers can avoid doing possibly-expensive processing to compute
* query_is_distinct_for()'s argument lists if the call could not possibly
* succeed.
*/
bool
query_supports_distinctness(Query *query)
{
if (query->distinctClause != NIL ||
query->groupClause != NIL ||
query->groupingSets != NIL ||
query->hasAggs ||
query->havingQual ||
query->setOperations)
return true;
return false;
}
/*
* query_is_distinct_for - does query never return duplicates of the
* specified columns?
*
* query is a not-yet-planned subquery (in current usage, it's always from
* a subquery RTE, which the planner avoids scribbling on).
*
* colnos is an integer list of output column numbers (resno's). We are
* interested in whether rows consisting of just these columns are certain
* to be distinct. "Distinctness" is defined according to whether the
* corresponding upper-level equality operators listed in opids would think
* the values are distinct. (Note: the opids entries could be cross-type
* operators, and thus not exactly the equality operators that the subquery
* would use itself. We use equality_ops_are_compatible() to check
* compatibility. That looks at btree or hash opfamily membership, and so
* should give trustworthy answers for all operators that we might need
* to deal with here.)
*/
bool
query_is_distinct_for(Query *query, List *colnos, List *opids)
{
ListCell *l;
Oid opid;
Assert(list_length(colnos) == list_length(opids));
/*
* A set-returning function in the query's targetlist can result in
* returning duplicate rows, if the SRF is evaluated after the
* de-duplication step; so we play it safe and say "no" if there are any
* SRFs. (We could be certain that it's okay if SRFs appear only in the
* specified columns, since those must be evaluated before de-duplication;
* but it doesn't presently seem worth the complication to check that.)
*/
if (expression_returns_set((Node *) query->targetList))
return false;
/*
* DISTINCT (including DISTINCT ON) guarantees uniqueness if all the
* columns in the DISTINCT clause appear in colnos and operator semantics
* match.
*/
if (query->distinctClause)
{
foreach(l, query->distinctClause)
{
SortGroupClause *sgc = (SortGroupClause *) lfirst(l);
TargetEntry *tle = get_sortgroupclause_tle(sgc,
query->targetList);
opid = distinct_col_search(tle->resno, colnos, opids);
if (!OidIsValid(opid) ||
!equality_ops_are_compatible(opid, sgc->eqop))
break; /* exit early if no match */
}
if (l == NULL) /* had matches for all? */
return true;
}
/*
* Similarly, GROUP BY without GROUPING SETS guarantees uniqueness if all
* the grouped columns appear in colnos and operator semantics match.
*/
if (query->groupClause && !query->groupingSets)
{
foreach(l, query->groupClause)
{
SortGroupClause *sgc = (SortGroupClause *) lfirst(l);
TargetEntry *tle = get_sortgroupclause_tle(sgc,
query->targetList);
opid = distinct_col_search(tle->resno, colnos, opids);
if (!OidIsValid(opid) ||
!equality_ops_are_compatible(opid, sgc->eqop))
break; /* exit early if no match */
}
if (l == NULL) /* had matches for all? */
return true;
}
else if (query->groupingSets)
{
/*
* If we have grouping sets with expressions, we probably don't have
* uniqueness and analysis would be hard. Punt.
*/
if (query->groupClause)
return false;
/*
* If we have no groupClause (therefore no grouping expressions), we
* might have one or many empty grouping sets. If there's just one,
* then we're returning only one row and are certainly unique. But
* otherwise, we know we're certainly not unique.
*/
if (list_length(query->groupingSets) == 1 &&
((GroupingSet *) linitial(query->groupingSets))->kind == GROUPING_SET_EMPTY)
return true;
else
return false;
}
else
{
/*
* If we have no GROUP BY, but do have aggregates or HAVING, then the
* result is at most one row so it's surely unique, for any operators.
*/
if (query->hasAggs || query->havingQual)
return true;
}
/*
* UNION, INTERSECT, EXCEPT guarantee uniqueness of the whole output row,
* except with ALL.
*/
if (query->setOperations)
{
SetOperationStmt *topop = (SetOperationStmt *) query->setOperations;
Assert(IsA(topop, SetOperationStmt));
Assert(topop->op != SETOP_NONE);
if (!topop->all)
{
ListCell *lg;
/* We're good if all the nonjunk output columns are in colnos */
lg = list_head(topop->groupClauses);
foreach(l, query->targetList)
{
TargetEntry *tle = (TargetEntry *) lfirst(l);
SortGroupClause *sgc;
if (tle->resjunk)
continue; /* ignore resjunk columns */
/* non-resjunk columns should have grouping clauses */
Assert(lg != NULL);
sgc = (SortGroupClause *) lfirst(lg);
lg = lnext(lg);
opid = distinct_col_search(tle->resno, colnos, opids);
if (!OidIsValid(opid) ||
!equality_ops_are_compatible(opid, sgc->eqop))
break; /* exit early if no match */
}
if (l == NULL) /* had matches for all? */
return true;
}
}
/*
* XXX Are there any other cases in which we can easily see the result
* must be distinct?
*
* If you do add more smarts to this function, be sure to update
* query_supports_distinctness() to match.
*/
return false;
}
/*
* distinct_col_search - subroutine for query_is_distinct_for
*
* If colno is in colnos, return the corresponding element of opids,
* else return InvalidOid. (Ordinarily colnos would not contain duplicates,
* but if it does, we arbitrarily select the first match.)
*/
static Oid
distinct_col_search(int colno, List *colnos, List *opids)
{
ListCell *lc1,
*lc2;
forboth(lc1, colnos, lc2, opids)
{
if (colno == lfirst_int(lc1))
return lfirst_oid(lc2);
}
return InvalidOid;
}