13aa624431
Updating or locking a row that was already locked by the same transaction under the same Xid caused a MultiXact to be created; but this is unnecessary, because there's no usefulness in being able to differentiate two locks by the same transaction. In particular, if a transaction executed SELECT FOR UPDATE followed by an UPDATE that didn't modify columns of the key, we would dutifully represent the resulting combination as a multixact -- even though a single key-update is sufficient. Optimize the case so that only the strongest of both locks/updates is represented in Xmax. This can save some Xmax's from becoming MultiXacts, which can be a significant optimization. This missed optimization opportunity was spotted by Andres Freund while investigating a bug reported by Oliver Seemann in message CANCipfpfzoYnOz5jj=UZ70_R=CwDHv36dqWSpwsi27vpm1z5sA@mail.gmail.com and also directly as a performance regression reported by Dong Ye in message d54b8387.000012d8.00000010@YED-DEVD1.vmware.com Reportedly, this patch fixes the performance regression. Since the missing optimization was reported as a significant performance regression from 9.2, backpatch to 9.3. Andres Freund, tweaked by Álvaro Herrera |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| common | ||
| gin | ||
| gist | ||
| hash | ||
| heap | ||
| index | ||
| nbtree | ||
| rmgrdesc | ||
| spgist | ||
| transam | ||
| Makefile | ||