postgresql/doc/src/sgml/btree.sgml
Teodor Sigaev 8224de4f42 Indexes with INCLUDE columns and their support in B-tree
This patch introduces INCLUDE clause to index definition.  This clause
specifies a list of columns which will be included as a non-key part in
the index.  The INCLUDE columns exist solely to allow more queries to
benefit from index-only scans.  Also, such columns don't need to have
appropriate operator classes.  Expressions are not supported as INCLUDE
columns since they cannot be used in index-only scans.

Index access methods supporting INCLUDE are indicated by amcaninclude flag
in IndexAmRoutine.  For now, only B-tree indexes support INCLUDE clause.

In B-tree indexes INCLUDE columns are truncated from pivot index tuples
(tuples located in non-leaf pages and high keys).  Therefore, B-tree indexes
now might have variable number of attributes.  This patch also provides
generic facility to support that: pivot tuples contain number of their
attributes in t_tid.ip_posid.  Free 13th bit of t_info is used for indicating
that.  This facility will simplify further support of index suffix truncation.
The changes of above are backward-compatible, pg_upgrade doesn't need special
handling of B-tree indexes for that.

Bump catalog version

Author: Anastasia Lubennikova with contribition by Alexander Korotkov and me
Reviewed by: Peter Geoghegan, Tomas Vondra, Antonin Houska, Jeff Janes,
			 David Rowley, Alexander Korotkov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/56168952.4010101@postgrespro.ru
2018-04-07 23:00:39 +03:00

464 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext

<!-- doc/src/sgml/btree.sgml -->
<chapter id="btree">
<title>B-Tree Indexes</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>index</primary>
<secondary>B-Tree</secondary>
</indexterm>
<sect1 id="btree-intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<para>
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> includes an implementation of the
standard <acronym>btree</acronym> (multi-way binary tree) index data
structure. Any data type that can be sorted into a well-defined linear
order can be indexed by a btree index. The only limitation is that an
index entry cannot exceed approximately one-third of a page (after TOAST
compression, if applicable).
</para>
<para>
Because each btree operator class imposes a sort order on its data type,
btree operator classes (or, really, operator families) have come to be
used as <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>'s general representation
and understanding of sorting semantics. Therefore, they've acquired
some features that go beyond what would be needed just to support btree
indexes, and parts of the system that are quite distant from the
btree AM make use of them.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="btree-behavior">
<title>Behavior of B-Tree Operator Classes</title>
<para>
As shown in <xref linkend="xindex-btree-strat-table"/>, a btree operator
class must provide five comparison operators,
<literal>&lt;</literal>,
<literal>&lt;=</literal>,
<literal>=</literal>,
<literal>&gt;=</literal> and
<literal>&gt;</literal>.
One might expect that <literal>&lt;&gt;</literal> should also be part of
the operator class, but it is not, because it would almost never be
useful to use a <literal>&lt;&gt;</literal> WHERE clause in an index
search. (For some purposes, the planner treats <literal>&lt;&gt;</literal>
as associated with a btree operator class; but it finds that operator via
the <literal>=</literal> operator's negator link, rather than
from <structname>pg_amop</structname>.)
</para>
<para>
When several data types share near-identical sorting semantics, their
operator classes can be grouped into an operator family. Doing so is
advantageous because it allows the planner to make deductions about
cross-type comparisons. Each operator class within the family should
contain the single-type operators (and associated support functions)
for its input data type, while cross-type comparison operators and
support functions are <quote>loose</quote> in the family. It is
recommendable that a complete set of cross-type operators be included
in the family, thus ensuring that the planner can represent any
comparison conditions that it deduces from transitivity.
</para>
<para>
There are some basic assumptions that a btree operator family must
satisfy:
</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
An <literal>=</literal> operator must be an equivalence relation; that
is, for all non-null values <replaceable>A</replaceable>,
<replaceable>B</replaceable>, <replaceable>C</replaceable> of the
data type:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
<replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>=</literal>
<replaceable>A</replaceable> is true
(<firstterm>reflexive law</firstterm>)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
if <replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>=</literal>
<replaceable>B</replaceable>,
then <replaceable>B</replaceable> <literal>=</literal>
<replaceable>A</replaceable>
(<firstterm>symmetric law</firstterm>)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
if <replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>=</literal>
<replaceable>B</replaceable> and <replaceable>B</replaceable>
<literal>=</literal> <replaceable>C</replaceable>,
then <replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>=</literal>
<replaceable>C</replaceable>
(<firstterm>transitive law</firstterm>)
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
A <literal>&lt;</literal> operator must be a strong ordering relation;
that is, for all non-null values <replaceable>A</replaceable>,
<replaceable>B</replaceable>, <replaceable>C</replaceable>:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
<replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>&lt;</literal>
<replaceable>A</replaceable> is false
(<firstterm>irreflexive law</firstterm>)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
if <replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>&lt;</literal>
<replaceable>B</replaceable>
and <replaceable>B</replaceable> <literal>&lt;</literal>
<replaceable>C</replaceable>,
then <replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>&lt;</literal>
<replaceable>C</replaceable>
(<firstterm>transitive law</firstterm>)
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Furthermore, the ordering is total; that is, for all non-null
values <replaceable>A</replaceable>, <replaceable>B</replaceable>:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
exactly one of <replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>&lt;</literal>
<replaceable>B</replaceable>, <replaceable>A</replaceable>
<literal>=</literal> <replaceable>B</replaceable>, and
<replaceable>B</replaceable> <literal>&lt;</literal>
<replaceable>A</replaceable> is true
(<firstterm>trichotomy law</firstterm>)
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
(The trichotomy law justifies the definition of the comparison support
function, of course.)
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
<para>
The other three operators are defined in terms of <literal>=</literal>
and <literal>&lt;</literal> in the obvious way, and must act consistently
with them.
</para>
<para>
For an operator family supporting multiple data types, the above laws must
hold when <replaceable>A</replaceable>, <replaceable>B</replaceable>,
<replaceable>C</replaceable> are taken from any data types in the family.
The transitive laws are the trickiest to ensure, as in cross-type
situations they represent statements that the behaviors of two or three
different operators are consistent.
As an example, it would not work to put <type>float8</type>
and <type>numeric</type> into the same operator family, at least not with
the current semantics that <type>numeric</type> values are converted
to <type>float8</type> for comparison to a <type>float8</type>. Because
of the limited accuracy of <type>float8</type>, this means there are
distinct <type>numeric</type> values that will compare equal to the
same <type>float8</type> value, and thus the transitive law would fail.
</para>
<para>
Another requirement for a multiple-data-type family is that any implicit
or binary-coercion casts that are defined between data types included in
the operator family must not change the associated sort ordering.
</para>
<para>
It should be fairly clear why a btree index requires these laws to hold
within a single data type: without them there is no ordering to arrange
the keys with. Also, index searches using a comparison key of a
different data type require comparisons to behave sanely across two
data types. The extensions to three or more data types within a family
are not strictly required by the btree index mechanism itself, but the
planner relies on them for optimization purposes.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="btree-support-funcs">
<title>B-Tree Support Functions</title>
<para>
As shown in <xref linkend="xindex-btree-support-table"/>, btree defines
one required and two optional support functions.
</para>
<para>
For each combination of data types that a btree operator family provides
comparison operators for, it must provide a comparison support function,
registered in <structname>pg_amproc</structname> with support function
number 1 and
<structfield>amproclefttype</structfield>/<structfield>amprocrighttype</structfield>
equal to the left and right data types for the comparison (i.e., the
same data types that the matching operators are registered with
in <structname>pg_amop</structname>).
The comparison function must take two non-null values
<replaceable>A</replaceable> and <replaceable>B</replaceable> and
return an <type>int32</type> value that
is <literal>&lt;</literal> <literal>0</literal>, <literal>0</literal>,
or <literal>&gt;</literal> <literal>0</literal>
when <replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>&lt;</literal>
<replaceable>B</replaceable>, <replaceable>A</replaceable>
<literal>=</literal> <replaceable>B</replaceable>,
or <replaceable>A</replaceable> <literal>&gt;</literal>
<replaceable>B</replaceable>, respectively. The function must not
return <literal>INT_MIN</literal> for the <replaceable>A</replaceable>
<literal>&lt;</literal> <replaceable>B</replaceable> case,
since the value may be negated before being tested for sign. A null
result is disallowed, too.
See <filename>src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtcompare.c</filename> for
examples.
</para>
<para>
If the compared values are of a collatable data type, the appropriate
collation OID will be passed to the comparison support function, using
the standard <function>PG_GET_COLLATION()</function> mechanism.
</para>
<para>
Optionally, a btree operator family may provide <firstterm>sort
support</firstterm> function(s), registered under support function number
2. These functions allow implementing comparisons for sorting purposes
in a more efficient way than naively calling the comparison support
function. The APIs involved in this are defined in
<filename>src/include/utils/sortsupport.h</filename>.
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>in_range support functions</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>support functions</primary>
<secondary>in_range</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
Optionally, a btree operator family may
provide <firstterm>in_range</firstterm> support function(s), registered
under support function number 3. These are not used during btree index
operations; rather, they extend the semantics of the operator family so
that it can support window clauses containing
the <literal>RANGE</literal> <replaceable>offset</replaceable>
<literal>PRECEDING</literal>
and <literal>RANGE</literal> <replaceable>offset</replaceable>
<literal>FOLLOWING</literal> frame bound types (see
<xref linkend="syntax-window-functions"/>). Fundamentally, the extra
information provided is how to add or subtract
an <replaceable>offset</replaceable> value in a way that is compatible
with the family's data ordering.
</para>
<para>
An <function>in_range</function> function must have the signature
<synopsis>
in_range(<replaceable>val</replaceable> type1, <replaceable>base</replaceable> type1, <replaceable>offset</replaceable> type2, <replaceable>sub</replaceable> bool, <replaceable>less</replaceable> bool)
returns bool
</synopsis>
<replaceable>val</replaceable> and <replaceable>base</replaceable> must be
of the same type, which is one of the types supported by the operator
family (i.e., a type for which it provides an ordering).
However, <replaceable>offset</replaceable> could be of a different type,
which might be one otherwise unsupported by the family. An example is
that the built-in <literal>time_ops</literal> family provides
an <function>in_range</function> function that
has <replaceable>offset</replaceable> of type <type>interval</type>.
A family can provide <function>in_range</function> functions for any of
its supported types and one or more <replaceable>offset</replaceable>
types. Each <function>in_range</function> function should be entered
in <structname>pg_amproc</structname>
with <structfield>amproclefttype</structfield> equal to <type>type1</type>
and <structfield>amprocrighttype</structfield> equal to <type>type2</type>.
</para>
<para>
The essential semantics of an <function>in_range</function> function
depend on the two boolean flag parameters. It should add or
subtract <replaceable>base</replaceable>
and <replaceable>offset</replaceable>, then
compare <replaceable>val</replaceable> to the result, as follows:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
if <literal>!</literal><replaceable>sub</replaceable> and
<literal>!</literal><replaceable>less</replaceable>,
return <replaceable>val</replaceable> <literal>&gt;=</literal>
(<replaceable>base</replaceable> <literal>+</literal>
<replaceable>offset</replaceable>)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
if <literal>!</literal><replaceable>sub</replaceable>
and <replaceable>less</replaceable>,
return <replaceable>val</replaceable> <literal>&lt;=</literal>
(<replaceable>base</replaceable> <literal>+</literal>
<replaceable>offset</replaceable>)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
if <replaceable>sub</replaceable>
and <literal>!</literal><replaceable>less</replaceable>,
return <replaceable>val</replaceable> <literal>&gt;=</literal>
(<replaceable>base</replaceable> <literal>-</literal>
<replaceable>offset</replaceable>)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
if <replaceable>sub</replaceable> and <replaceable>less</replaceable>,
return <replaceable>val</replaceable> <literal>&lt;=</literal>
(<replaceable>base</replaceable> <literal>-</literal>
<replaceable>offset</replaceable>)
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
Before doing so, the function should check the sign
of <replaceable>offset</replaceable>: if it is less than zero, raise
error <literal>ERRCODE_INVALID_PRECEDING_FOLLOWING_SIZE</literal> (22013)
with error text like <quote>invalid preceding or following size in window
function</quote>. (This is required by the SQL standard, although
nonstandard operator families might perhaps choose to ignore this
restriction, since there seems to be little semantic necessity for it.)
This requirement is delegated to the <function>in_range</function>
function so that the core code needn't understand what <quote>less than
zero</quote> means for a particular data type.
</para>
<para>
An additional expectation is that <function>in_range</function> functions
should, if practical, avoid throwing an error
if <replaceable>base</replaceable> <literal>+</literal>
<replaceable>offset</replaceable>
or <replaceable>base</replaceable> <literal>-</literal>
<replaceable>offset</replaceable> would overflow.
The correct comparison result can be determined even if that value would
be out of the data type's range. Note that if the data type includes
concepts such as <quote>infinity</quote> or <quote>NaN</quote>, extra care
may be needed to ensure that <function>in_range</function>'s results agree
with the normal sort order of the operator family.
</para>
<para>
The results of the <function>in_range</function> function must be
consistent with the sort ordering imposed by the operator family.
To be precise, given any fixed values of <replaceable>offset</replaceable>
and <replaceable>sub</replaceable>, then:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
If <function>in_range</function> with <replaceable>less</replaceable> =
true is true for some <replaceable>val1</replaceable>
and <replaceable>base</replaceable>, it must be true for
every <replaceable>val2</replaceable> <literal>&lt;=</literal>
<replaceable>val1</replaceable> with the
same <replaceable>base</replaceable>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
If <function>in_range</function> with <replaceable>less</replaceable> =
true is false for some <replaceable>val1</replaceable>
and <replaceable>base</replaceable>, it must be false for
every <replaceable>val2</replaceable> <literal>&gt;=</literal>
<replaceable>val1</replaceable> with the
same <replaceable>base</replaceable>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
If <function>in_range</function> with <replaceable>less</replaceable> =
true is true for some <replaceable>val</replaceable>
and <replaceable>base1</replaceable>, it must be true for
every <replaceable>base2</replaceable> <literal>&gt;=</literal>
<replaceable>base1</replaceable> with the
same <replaceable>val</replaceable>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
If <function>in_range</function> with <replaceable>less</replaceable> =
true is false for some <replaceable>val</replaceable>
and <replaceable>base1</replaceable>, it must be false for
every <replaceable>base2</replaceable> <literal>&lt;=</literal>
<replaceable>base1</replaceable> with the
same <replaceable>val</replaceable>.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
Analogous statements with inverted conditions hold
when <replaceable>less</replaceable> = false.
</para>
<para>
If the type being ordered (<type>type1</type>) is collatable,
the appropriate collation OID will be passed to
the <function>in_range</function> function, using the standard
PG_GET_COLLATION() mechanism.
</para>
<para>
<function>in_range</function> functions need not handle NULL inputs, and
typically will be marked strict.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="btree-included-attributes">
<title>Included attributes in B-tree indexes</title>
<para>
As of <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> 11.0 there is an optional
INCLUDE clause, which allows to add non-key (included) attributes to index.
Those included attributes allow more queries to benefit from index-only scans.
We never use included attributes in ScanKeys for search. That allows us to
include into B-tree any datatypes, even those which don't have suitable
operator classes. Included columns only stored in regular tuples on leaf
pages. All pivot tuples on non-leaf pages and highkey tuples are truncated
to contain only key attributes. That helps to slightly reduce the size of
index.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="btree-implementation">
<title>Implementation</title>
<para>
An introduction to the btree index implementation can be found in
<filename>src/backend/access/nbtree/README</filename>.
</para>
</sect1>
</chapter>