rdelaage/postgresql
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git synced 2024-08-21 16:13:23 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
8e617e29aa
postgresql/src/test/regress/expected/subselect.out
Tom Lane 8e617e29aa Fix whole-row Var evaluation to cope with resjunk columns (again). 
When a whole-row Var is reading the result of a subquery, we need it to
ignore any "resjunk" columns that the subquery might have evaluated for
GROUP BY or ORDER BY purposes.  We've hacked this area before, in commit
68e40998d0, but that fix only covered
whole-row Vars of named composite types, not those of RECORD type; and it
was mighty klugy anyway, since it just assumed without checking that any
extra columns in the result must be resjunk.  A proper fix requires getting
hold of the subquery's targetlist so we can actually see which columns are
resjunk (whereupon we can use a JunkFilter to get rid of them).  So bite
the bullet and add some infrastructure to make that possible.

Per report from Andrew Dunstan and additional testing by Merlin Moncure.
Back-patch to all supported branches.  In 8.3, also back-patch commit
292176a118, which for some reason I had
not done at the time, but it's a prerequisite for this change.
2012-07-20 13:10:58 -04:00

567 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

--
-- SUBSELECT
--
SELECT 1 AS one WHERE 1 IN (SELECT 1);
one
-----
1
(1 row)
SELECT 1 AS zero WHERE 1 NOT IN (SELECT 1);
zero
------
(0 rows)
SELECT 1 AS zero WHERE 1 IN (SELECT 2);
zero
------
(0 rows)
-- Set up some simple test tables
CREATE TABLE SUBSELECT_TBL (
f1 integer,
f2 integer,
f3 float
);
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (1, 2, 3);
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (2, 3, 4);
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (3, 4, 5);
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (1, 1, 1);
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (2, 2, 2);
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (3, 3, 3);
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (6, 7, 8);
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (8, 9, NULL);
SELECT '' AS eight, * FROM SUBSELECT_TBL;
eight | f1 | f2 | f3
-------+----+----+----
| 1 | 2 | 3
| 2 | 3 | 4
| 3 | 4 | 5
| 1 | 1 | 1
| 2 | 2 | 2
| 3 | 3 | 3
| 6 | 7 | 8
| 8 | 9 |
(8 rows)
-- Uncorrelated subselects
SELECT '' AS two, f1 AS "Constant Select" FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
WHERE f1 IN (SELECT 1);
two | Constant Select
-----+-----------------
| 1
| 1
(2 rows)
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Uncorrelated Field" FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
WHERE f1 IN (SELECT f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL);
six | Uncorrelated Field
-----+--------------------
| 1
| 2
| 3
| 1
| 2
| 3
(6 rows)
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Uncorrelated Field" FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
WHERE f1 IN (SELECT f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL WHERE
f2 IN (SELECT f1 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL));
six | Uncorrelated Field
-----+--------------------
| 1
| 2
| 3
| 1
| 2
| 3
(6 rows)
SELECT '' AS three, f1, f2
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
WHERE (f1, f2) NOT IN (SELECT f2, CAST(f3 AS int4) FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
WHERE f3 IS NOT NULL);
three | f1 | f2
-------+----+----
| 1 | 2
| 6 | 7
| 8 | 9
(3 rows)
-- Correlated subselects
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Correlated Field", f2 AS "Second Field"
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL upper
WHERE f1 IN (SELECT f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL WHERE f1 = upper.f1);
six | Correlated Field | Second Field
-----+------------------+--------------
| 1 | 2
| 2 | 3
| 3 | 4
| 1 | 1
| 2 | 2
| 3 | 3
(6 rows)
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Correlated Field", f3 AS "Second Field"
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL upper
WHERE f1 IN
(SELECT f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL WHERE CAST(upper.f2 AS float) = f3);
six | Correlated Field | Second Field
-----+------------------+--------------
| 2 | 4
| 3 | 5
| 1 | 1
| 2 | 2
| 3 | 3
(5 rows)
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Correlated Field", f3 AS "Second Field"
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL upper
WHERE f3 IN (SELECT upper.f1 + f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
WHERE f2 = CAST(f3 AS integer));
six | Correlated Field | Second Field
-----+------------------+--------------
| 1 | 3
| 2 | 4
| 3 | 5
| 6 | 8
(4 rows)
SELECT '' AS five, f1 AS "Correlated Field"
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
WHERE (f1, f2) IN (SELECT f2, CAST(f3 AS int4) FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
WHERE f3 IS NOT NULL);
five | Correlated Field
------+------------------
| 2
| 3
| 1
| 2
| 3
(5 rows)
--
-- Use some existing tables in the regression test
--
SELECT '' AS eight, ss.f1 AS "Correlated Field", ss.f3 AS "Second Field"
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL ss
WHERE f1 NOT IN (SELECT f1+1 FROM INT4_TBL
WHERE f1 != ss.f1 AND f1 < 2147483647);
eight | Correlated Field | Second Field
-------+------------------+--------------
| 2 | 4
| 3 | 5
| 2 | 2
| 3 | 3
| 6 | 8
| 8 |
(6 rows)
select q1, float8(count(*)) / (select count(*) from int8_tbl)
from int8_tbl group by q1 order by q1;
q1 | ?column?
------------------+----------
123 | 0.4
4567890123456789 | 0.6
(2 rows)
--
-- Test cases to catch unpleasant interactions between IN-join processing
-- and subquery pullup.
--
select count(*) from
(select 1 from tenk1 a
where unique1 IN (select hundred from tenk1 b)) ss;
count
-------
100
(1 row)
select count(distinct ss.ten) from
(select ten from tenk1 a
where unique1 IN (select hundred from tenk1 b)) ss;
count
-------
10
(1 row)
select count(*) from
(select 1 from tenk1 a
where unique1 IN (select distinct hundred from tenk1 b)) ss;
count
-------
100
(1 row)
select count(distinct ss.ten) from
(select ten from tenk1 a
where unique1 IN (select distinct hundred from tenk1 b)) ss;
count
-------
10
(1 row)
--
-- Test cases to check for overenthusiastic optimization of
-- "IN (SELECT DISTINCT ...)" and related cases. Per example from
-- Luca Pireddu and Michael Fuhr.
--
CREATE TEMP TABLE foo (id integer);
CREATE TEMP TABLE bar (id1 integer, id2 integer);
INSERT INTO foo VALUES (1);
INSERT INTO bar VALUES (1, 1);
INSERT INTO bar VALUES (2, 2);
INSERT INTO bar VALUES (3, 1);
-- These cases require an extra level of distinct-ing above subquery s
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT DISTINCT id1, id2 FROM bar) AS s);
id
----
1
(1 row)
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT id1,id2 FROM bar GROUP BY id1,id2) AS s);
id
----
1
(1 row)
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT id1, id2 FROM bar UNION
SELECT id1, id2 FROM bar) AS s);
id
----
1
(1 row)
-- These cases do not
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT DISTINCT ON (id2) id1, id2 FROM bar) AS s);
id
----
1
(1 row)
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT id2 FROM bar GROUP BY id2) AS s);
id
----
1
(1 row)
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT id2 FROM bar UNION
SELECT id2 FROM bar) AS s);
id
----
1
(1 row)
--
-- Test case to catch problems with multiply nested sub-SELECTs not getting
-- recalculated properly. Per bug report from Didier Moens.
--
CREATE TABLE orderstest (
approver_ref integer,
po_ref integer,
ordercanceled boolean
);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (1, 1, false);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 5, false);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 6, false);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 7, false);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 1, true);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 8, false);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 1, false);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (77, 1, false);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (1, 1, false);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 1, false);
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (1, 1, false);
CREATE VIEW orders_view AS
SELECT *,
(SELECT CASE
WHEN ord.approver_ref=1 THEN '---' ELSE 'Approved'
END) AS "Approved",
(SELECT CASE
WHEN ord.ordercanceled
THEN 'Canceled'
ELSE
(SELECT CASE
WHEN ord.po_ref=1
THEN
(SELECT CASE
WHEN ord.approver_ref=1
THEN '---'
ELSE 'Approved'
END)
ELSE 'PO'
END)
END) AS "Status",
(CASE
WHEN ord.ordercanceled
THEN 'Canceled'
ELSE
(CASE
WHEN ord.po_ref=1
THEN
(CASE
WHEN ord.approver_ref=1
THEN '---'
ELSE 'Approved'
END)
ELSE 'PO'
END)
END) AS "Status_OK"
FROM orderstest ord;
SELECT * FROM orders_view;
approver_ref | po_ref | ordercanceled | Approved | Status | Status_OK
--------------+--------+---------------+----------+----------+-----------
1 | 1 | f | --- | --- | ---
66 | 5 | f | Approved | PO | PO
66 | 6 | f | Approved | PO | PO
66 | 7 | f | Approved | PO | PO
66 | 1 | t | Approved | Canceled | Canceled
66 | 8 | f | Approved | PO | PO
66 | 1 | f | Approved | Approved | Approved
77 | 1 | f | Approved | Approved | Approved
1 | 1 | f | --- | --- | ---
66 | 1 | f | Approved | Approved | Approved
1 | 1 | f | --- | --- | ---
(11 rows)
DROP TABLE orderstest cascade;
NOTICE: drop cascades to view orders_view
--
-- Test cases to catch situations where rule rewriter fails to propagate
-- hasSubLinks flag correctly. Per example from Kyle Bateman.
--
create temp table parts (
partnum text,
cost float8
);
create temp table shipped (
ttype char(2),
ordnum int4,
partnum text,
value float8
);
create temp view shipped_view as
select * from shipped where ttype = 'wt';
create rule shipped_view_insert as on insert to shipped_view do instead
insert into shipped values('wt', new.ordnum, new.partnum, new.value);
insert into parts (partnum, cost) values (1, 1234.56);
insert into shipped_view (ordnum, partnum, value)
values (0, 1, (select cost from parts where partnum = '1'));
select * from shipped_view;
ttype | ordnum | partnum | value
-------+--------+---------+---------
wt | 0 | 1 | 1234.56
(1 row)
create rule shipped_view_update as on update to shipped_view do instead
update shipped set partnum = new.partnum, value = new.value
where ttype = new.ttype and ordnum = new.ordnum;
update shipped_view set value = 11
from int4_tbl a join int4_tbl b
on (a.f1 = (select f1 from int4_tbl c where c.f1=b.f1))
where ordnum = a.f1;
select * from shipped_view;
ttype | ordnum | partnum | value
-------+--------+---------+-------
wt | 0 | 1 | 11
(1 row)
select f1, ss1 as relabel from
(select *, (select sum(f1) from int4_tbl b where f1 >= a.f1) as ss1
from int4_tbl a) ss;
f1 | relabel
-------------+------------
0 | 2147607103
123456 | 2147607103
-123456 | 2147483647
2147483647 | 2147483647
-2147483647 | 0
(5 rows)
--
-- Test cases involving PARAM_EXEC parameters and min/max index optimizations.
-- Per bug report from David Sanchez i Gregori.
--
select * from (
select max(unique1) from tenk1 as a
where exists (select 1 from tenk1 as b where b.thousand = a.unique2)
) ss;
max
------
9997
(1 row)
select * from (
select min(unique1) from tenk1 as a
where not exists (select 1 from tenk1 as b where b.unique2 = 10000)
) ss;
min
-----
0
(1 row)
--
-- Test that an IN implemented using a UniquePath does unique-ification
-- with the right semantics, as per bug #4113. (Unfortunately we have
-- no simple way to ensure that this test case actually chooses that type
-- of plan, but it does in releases 7.4-8.3. Note that an ordering difference
-- here might mean that some other plan type is being used, rendering the test
-- pointless.)
--
create temp table numeric_table (num_col numeric);
insert into numeric_table values (1), (1.000000000000000000001), (2), (3);
create temp table float_table (float_col float8);
insert into float_table values (1), (2), (3);
select * from float_table
where float_col in (select num_col from numeric_table);
float_col
-----------
1
2
3
(3 rows)
select * from numeric_table
where num_col in (select float_col from float_table);
num_col
-------------------------
1
1.000000000000000000001
2
3
(4 rows)
--
-- Test case for bug #4290: bogus calculation of subplan param sets
--
create temp table ta (id int primary key, val int);
insert into ta values(1,1);
insert into ta values(2,2);
create temp table tb (id int primary key, aval int);
insert into tb values(1,1);
insert into tb values(2,1);
insert into tb values(3,2);
insert into tb values(4,2);
create temp table tc (id int primary key, aid int);
insert into tc values(1,1);
insert into tc values(2,2);
select
( select min(tb.id) from tb
where tb.aval = (select ta.val from ta where ta.id = tc.aid) ) as min_tb_id
from tc;
min_tb_id
-----------
1
3
(2 rows)
--
-- Test case for 8.3 "failed to locate grouping columns" bug
--
create temp table t1 (f1 numeric(14,0), f2 varchar(30));
select * from
(select distinct f1, f2, (select f2 from t1 x where x.f1 = up.f1) as fs
from t1 up) ss
group by f1,f2,fs;
f1 | f2 | fs
----+----+----
(0 rows)
--
-- Test case for bug #5514 (mishandling of whole-row Vars in subselects)
--
create temp table table_a(id integer);
insert into table_a values (42);
create temp view view_a as select * from table_a;
select view_a from view_a;
view_a
--------
(42)
(1 row)
select (select view_a) from view_a;
view_a
--------
(42)
(1 row)
select (select (select view_a)) from view_a;
view_a
--------
(42)
(1 row)
select (select (a.*)::text) from view_a a;
a
------
(42)
(1 row)
--
-- Check that whole-row Vars reading the result of a subselect don't include
-- any junk columns therein
--
select q from (select max(f1) from int4_tbl group by f1 order by f1) q;
q
---------------
(-2147483647)
(-123456)
(0)
(123456)
(2147483647)
(5 rows)
with q as (select max(f1) from int4_tbl group by f1 order by f1)
select q from q;
q
---------------
(-2147483647)
(-123456)
(0)
(123456)
(2147483647)
(5 rows)
--
-- Test case for sublinks pushed down into subselects via join alias expansion
--
select
(select sq1) as qq1
from
(select exists(select 1 from int4_tbl where f1 = q2) as sq1, 42 as dummy
from int8_tbl) sq0
join
int4_tbl i4 on dummy = i4.f1;
qq1
-----
(0 rows)
--
-- Test case for premature memory release during hashing of subplan output
--
select '1'::text in (select '1'::name union all select '1'::name);
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)
--
-- Test case for planner bug with nested EXISTS handling
--
select a.thousand from tenk1 a, tenk1 b
where a.thousand = b.thousand
and exists ( select 1 from tenk1 c where b.hundred = c.hundred
and not exists ( select 1 from tenk1 d
where a.thousand = d.thousand ) );
thousand
----------
(0 rows)
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink