mirror of
https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
synced 2024-09-08 06:29:22 +02:00
9bbf6f7341
The recursion in cdissect() was careless about clearing match data for capturing parentheses after rejecting a partial match. This could allow a later back-reference to succeed when by rights it should fail for lack of a defined referent. To fix, think a little more rigorously about what the contract between different levels of cdissect's recursion needs to be. With the right spec, we can fix this using fewer rather than more resets of the match data; the key decision being that a failed sub-match is now explicitly responsible for clearing any matches it may have set. There are enough other cross-checks and optimizations in the code that it's not especially easy to exhibit this problem; usually, the match will fail as-expected. Plus, regexps that are even potentially vulnerable are most likely user errors, since there's just not much point in writing a back-ref that doesn't always have a referent. These facts perhaps explain why the issue hasn't been detected, even though it's almost certainly a couple of decades old. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/151435.1629733387@sss.pgh.pa.us |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| data | ||
| expected | ||
| input | ||
| output | ||
| sql | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| GNUmakefile | ||
| Makefile | ||
| parallel_schedule | ||
| pg_regress_main.c | ||
| pg_regress.c | ||
| pg_regress.h | ||
| README | ||
| regress.c | ||
| regressplans.sh | ||
| resultmap | ||
| standby_schedule | ||
Documentation concerning how to run these regression tests and interpret the results can be found in the PostgreSQL manual, in the chapter "Regression Tests".