David Rowley b5815dd00a Doc: Fix misleading statement about VACUUM memory limits ... In ec34040af I added a mention that there was no point in setting maintenance_work_limit to anything higher than 1GB for vacuum, but that was incorrect as ginInsertCleanup() also looks at what maintenance_work_mem is set to during VACUUM and that's not limited to 1GB. Here I attempt to make it more clear that the limitation is only around the number of dead tuple identifiers that we can collect during VACUUM. I've also added a note to autovacuum_work_mem to mention this limitation. I didn't do that in ec34040af as I'd had some wrong-headed ideas about just limiting the maximum value for that GUC to 1GB. Author: David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpGwOAvunp-E-bN_rbAs3hmxMoasm5pzkYDbf36h73s7w@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.6, same as ec34040af		2021-08-09 16:46:49 +12:00
..
src	Doc: Fix misleading statement about VACUUM memory limits	2021-08-09 16:46:49 +12:00
KNOWN_BUGS	…
MISSING_FEATURES	…
Makefile	Remove maintainer-check target, fold into normal build	2013-10-10 20:11:56 -04:00
TODO	Change documentation references to PG website to use https: not http:	2017-05-20 21:50:47 -04:00