postgresql/doc/src/sgml/tsm-system-time.sgml
Peter Eisentraut 9081bddbd7 Improve <xref> vs. <command> formatting in the documentation
SQL commands are generally marked up as <command>, except when a link
to a reference page is used using <xref>.  But the latter doesn't
create monospace markup, so this looks strange especially when a
paragraph contains a mix of links and non-links.

We considered putting <command> in the <refentrytitle> on the target
side, but that creates some formatting side effects elsewhere.
Generally, it seems safer to solve this on the link source side.

We can't put the <xref> inside the <command>; the DTD doesn't allow
this.  DocBook 5 would allow the <command> to have the linkend
attribute itself, but we are not there yet.

So to solve this for now, convert the <xref>s to <link> plus
<command>.  This gives the correct look and also gives some more
flexibility what we can put into the link text (e.g., subcommands or
other clauses).  In the future, these could then be converted to
DocBook 5 style.

I haven't converted absolutely all xrefs to SQL command reference
pages, only those where we care about the appearance of the link text
or where it was otherwise appropriate to make the appearance match a
bit better.  Also in some cases, the links where repetitive, so in
those cases the links where just removed and replaced by a plain
<command>.  In cases where we just want the link and don't
specifically care about the generated link text (typically phrased
"for further information see <xref ...>") the xref is kept.

Reported-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87o8pco34z.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
2020-10-03 16:40:02 +02:00

72 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext

<!-- doc/src/sgml/tsm-system-time.sgml -->
<sect1 id="tsm-system-time" xreflabel="tsm_system_time">
<title>tsm_system_time</title>
<indexterm zone="tsm-system-time">
<primary>tsm_system_time</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
The <filename>tsm_system_time</filename> module provides the table sampling method
<literal>SYSTEM_TIME</literal>, which can be used in
the <literal>TABLESAMPLE</literal> clause of a <link linkend="sql-select"><command>SELECT</command></link>
command.
</para>
<para>
This table sampling method accepts a single floating-point argument that
is the maximum number of milliseconds to spend reading the table. This
gives you direct control over how long the query takes, at the price that
the size of the sample becomes hard to predict. The resulting sample will
contain as many rows as could be read in the specified time, unless the
whole table has been read first.
</para>
<para>
Like the built-in <literal>SYSTEM</literal> sampling
method, <literal>SYSTEM_TIME</literal> performs block-level sampling, so
that the sample is not completely random but may be subject to clustering
effects, especially if only a small number of rows are selected.
</para>
<para>
<literal>SYSTEM_TIME</literal> does not support
the <literal>REPEATABLE</literal> clause.
</para>
<para>
This module is considered <quote>trusted</quote>, that is, it can be
installed by non-superusers who have <literal>CREATE</literal> privilege
on the current database.
</para>
<sect2>
<title>Examples</title>
<para>
Here is an example of selecting a sample of a table with
<literal>SYSTEM_TIME</literal>. First install the extension:
</para>
<programlisting>
CREATE EXTENSION tsm_system_time;
</programlisting>
<para>
Then you can use it in a <command>SELECT</command> command, for instance:
<programlisting>
SELECT * FROM my_table TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM_TIME(1000);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
This command will return as large a sample of <structname>my_table</structname> as
it can read in 1 second (1000 milliseconds). Of course, if the whole
table can be read in under 1 second, all its rows will be returned.
</para>
</sect2>
</sect1>