postgresql/contrib/test_shm_mq/worker.c
Bruce Momjian 0a78320057 pgindent run for 9.4
This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was
applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.
2014-05-06 12:12:18 -04:00

225 lines
6.9 KiB
C

/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* worker.c
* Code for sample worker making use of shared memory message queues.
* Our test worker simply reads messages from one message queue and
* writes them back out to another message queue. In a real
* application, you'd presumably want the worker to do some more
* complex calculation rather than simply returning the input,
* but it should be possible to use much of the control logic just
* as presented here.
*
* Copyright (C) 2013, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* contrib/test_shm_mq/worker.c
*
* -------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#include "postgres.h"
#include "miscadmin.h"
#include "storage/ipc.h"
#include "storage/procarray.h"
#include "storage/shm_mq.h"
#include "storage/shm_toc.h"
#include "utils/resowner.h"
#include "test_shm_mq.h"
static void handle_sigterm(SIGNAL_ARGS);
static void attach_to_queues(dsm_segment *seg, shm_toc *toc,
int myworkernumber, shm_mq_handle **inqhp,
shm_mq_handle **outqhp);
static void copy_messages(shm_mq_handle *inqh, shm_mq_handle *outqh);
/*
* Background worker entrypoint.
*
* This is intended to demonstrate how a background worker can be used to
* facilitate a parallel computation. Most of the logic here is fairly
* boilerplate stuff, designed to attach to the shared memory segment,
* notify the user backend that we're alive, and so on. The
* application-specific bits of logic that you'd replace for your own worker
* are attach_to_queues() and copy_messages().
*/
void
test_shm_mq_main(Datum main_arg)
{
dsm_segment *seg;
shm_toc *toc;
shm_mq_handle *inqh;
shm_mq_handle *outqh;
volatile test_shm_mq_header *hdr;
int myworkernumber;
PGPROC *registrant;
/*
* Establish signal handlers.
*
* We want CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to kill off this worker process just as
* it would a normal user backend. To make that happen, we establish a
* signal handler that is a stripped-down version of die(). We don't have
* any equivalent of the backend's command-read loop, where interrupts can
* be processed immediately, so make sure ImmediateInterruptOK is turned
* off.
*/
pqsignal(SIGTERM, handle_sigterm);
ImmediateInterruptOK = false;
BackgroundWorkerUnblockSignals();
/*
* Connect to the dynamic shared memory segment.
*
* The backend that registered this worker passed us the ID of a shared
* memory segment to which we must attach for further instructions. In
* order to attach to dynamic shared memory, we need a resource owner.
* Once we've mapped the segment in our address space, attach to the table
* of contents so we can locate the various data structures we'll need to
* find within the segment.
*/
CurrentResourceOwner = ResourceOwnerCreate(NULL, "test_shm_mq worker");
seg = dsm_attach(DatumGetInt32(main_arg));
if (seg == NULL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
errmsg("unable to map dynamic shared memory segment")));
toc = shm_toc_attach(PG_TEST_SHM_MQ_MAGIC, dsm_segment_address(seg));
if (toc == NULL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
errmsg("bad magic number in dynamic shared memory segment")));
/*
* Acquire a worker number.
*
* By convention, the process registering this background worker should
* have stored the control structure at key 0. We look up that key to
* find it. Our worker number gives our identity: there may be just one
* worker involved in this parallel operation, or there may be many.
*/
hdr = shm_toc_lookup(toc, 0);
SpinLockAcquire(&hdr->mutex);
myworkernumber = ++hdr->workers_attached;
SpinLockRelease(&hdr->mutex);
if (myworkernumber > hdr->workers_total)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
errmsg("too many message queue testing workers already")));
/*
* Attach to the appropriate message queues.
*/
attach_to_queues(seg, toc, myworkernumber, &inqh, &outqh);
/*
* Indicate that we're fully initialized and ready to begin the main part
* of the parallel operation.
*
* Once we signal that we're ready, the user backend is entitled to assume
* that our on_dsm_detach callbacks will fire before we disconnect from
* the shared memory segment and exit. Generally, that means we must have
* attached to all relevant dynamic shared memory data structures by now.
*/
SpinLockAcquire(&hdr->mutex);
++hdr->workers_ready;
SpinLockRelease(&hdr->mutex);
registrant = BackendPidGetProc(MyBgworkerEntry->bgw_notify_pid);
if (registrant == NULL)
{
elog(DEBUG1, "registrant backend has exited prematurely");
proc_exit(1);
}
SetLatch(&registrant->procLatch);
/* Do the work. */
copy_messages(inqh, outqh);
/*
* We're done. Explicitly detach the shared memory segment so that we
* don't get a resource leak warning at commit time. This will fire any
* on_dsm_detach callbacks we've registered, as well. Once that's done,
* we can go ahead and exit.
*/
dsm_detach(seg);
proc_exit(1);
}
/*
* Attach to shared memory message queues.
*
* We use our worker number to determine to which queue we should attach.
* The queues are registered at keys 1..<number-of-workers>. The user backend
* writes to queue #1 and reads from queue #<number-of-workers>; each worker
* reads from the queue whose number is equal to its worker number and writes
* to the next higher-numbered queue.
*/
static void
attach_to_queues(dsm_segment *seg, shm_toc *toc, int myworkernumber,
shm_mq_handle **inqhp, shm_mq_handle **outqhp)
{
shm_mq *inq;
shm_mq *outq;
inq = shm_toc_lookup(toc, myworkernumber);
shm_mq_set_receiver(inq, MyProc);
*inqhp = shm_mq_attach(inq, seg, NULL);
outq = shm_toc_lookup(toc, myworkernumber + 1);
shm_mq_set_sender(outq, MyProc);
*outqhp = shm_mq_attach(outq, seg, NULL);
}
/*
* Loop, receiving and sending messages, until the connection is broken.
*
* This is the "real work" performed by this worker process. Everything that
* happens before this is initialization of one form or another, and everything
* after this point is cleanup.
*/
static void
copy_messages(shm_mq_handle *inqh, shm_mq_handle *outqh)
{
Size len;
void *data;
shm_mq_result res;
for (;;)
{
/* Notice any interrupts that have occurred. */
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
/* Receive a message. */
res = shm_mq_receive(inqh, &len, &data, false);
if (res != SHM_MQ_SUCCESS)
break;
/* Send it back out. */
res = shm_mq_send(outqh, len, data, false);
if (res != SHM_MQ_SUCCESS)
break;
}
}
/*
* When we receive a SIGTERM, we set InterruptPending and ProcDiePending just
* like a normal backend. The next CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() will do the right
* thing.
*/
static void
handle_sigterm(SIGNAL_ARGS)
{
int save_errno = errno;
if (MyProc)
SetLatch(&MyProc->procLatch);
if (!proc_exit_inprogress)
{
InterruptPending = true;
ProcDiePending = true;
}
errno = save_errno;
}