David Rowley deb6ffd4fd Doc: Fix misleading statement about VACUUM memory limits ... In ec34040af I added a mention that there was no point in setting maintenance_work_limit to anything higher than 1GB for vacuum, but that was incorrect as ginInsertCleanup() also looks at what maintenance_work_mem is set to during VACUUM and that's not limited to 1GB. Here I attempt to make it more clear that the limitation is only around the number of dead tuple identifiers that we can collect during VACUUM. I've also added a note to autovacuum_work_mem to mention this limitation. I didn't do that in ec34040af as I'd had some wrong-headed ideas about just limiting the maximum value for that GUC to 1GB. Author: David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpGwOAvunp-E-bN_rbAs3hmxMoasm5pzkYDbf36h73s7w@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.6, same as ec34040af		2021-08-09 16:45:35 +12:00
..
src	Doc: Fix misleading statement about VACUUM memory limits	2021-08-09 16:45:35 +12:00
KNOWN_BUGS
Makefile
MISSING_FEATURES
TODO