Tom Lane 156475a589 Revert my patch of 2009-04-04 that removed contrib/intarray's definitions of ... the <@ and @> operators. These are not in fact equivalent to the built-in anyarray operators of the same names, because they have different behavior for empty arrays, namely they don't think empty arrays are contained in anything. That is mathematically wrong, no doubt, but until we can persuade GIN indexes to implement the mathematical definition we should probably not change this. Another reason for not changing it now is that we can't yet ensure the opclasses will be updated correctly in a dump-and-reload upgrade. Per recent discussions.		2009-06-07 20:09:34 +00:00
..
bench
data
expected
sql
_int_bool.c
_int_gin.c	Adjust the APIs for GIN opclass support functions to allow the extractQuery()	2009-03-25 22:19:02 +00:00
_int_gist.c
_int_op.c
_int_tool.c
_int.h
_int.sql.in	Revert my patch of 2009-04-04 that removed contrib/intarray's definitions of	2009-06-07 20:09:34 +00:00
_intbig_gist.c
Makefile
uninstall__int.sql	Revert my patch of 2009-04-04 that removed contrib/intarray's definitions of	2009-06-07 20:09:34 +00:00