mirror of
https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
synced 2024-08-21 18:53:24 +02:00
If such a Var appeared within a nested sub-select, we failed to translate it correctly during pullup of the view, because the recursive call to replace_rte_variables_mutator was looking for the wrong sublevels_up value. Bug was introduced during the addition of the PlaceHolderVar mechanism. Per bug #5514 from Marcos Castedo.
510 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
510 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
--
|
|
-- SUBSELECT
|
|
--
|
|
SELECT 1 AS one WHERE 1 IN (SELECT 1);
|
|
one
|
|
-----
|
|
1
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
SELECT 1 AS zero WHERE 1 NOT IN (SELECT 1);
|
|
zero
|
|
------
|
|
(0 rows)
|
|
|
|
SELECT 1 AS zero WHERE 1 IN (SELECT 2);
|
|
zero
|
|
------
|
|
(0 rows)
|
|
|
|
-- Set up some simple test tables
|
|
CREATE TABLE SUBSELECT_TBL (
|
|
f1 integer,
|
|
f2 integer,
|
|
f3 float
|
|
);
|
|
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (1, 2, 3);
|
|
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (2, 3, 4);
|
|
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (3, 4, 5);
|
|
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (1, 1, 1);
|
|
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (2, 2, 2);
|
|
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (3, 3, 3);
|
|
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (6, 7, 8);
|
|
INSERT INTO SUBSELECT_TBL VALUES (8, 9, NULL);
|
|
SELECT '' AS eight, * FROM SUBSELECT_TBL;
|
|
eight | f1 | f2 | f3
|
|
-------+----+----+----
|
|
| 1 | 2 | 3
|
|
| 2 | 3 | 4
|
|
| 3 | 4 | 5
|
|
| 1 | 1 | 1
|
|
| 2 | 2 | 2
|
|
| 3 | 3 | 3
|
|
| 6 | 7 | 8
|
|
| 8 | 9 |
|
|
(8 rows)
|
|
|
|
-- Uncorrelated subselects
|
|
SELECT '' AS two, f1 AS "Constant Select" FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
|
|
WHERE f1 IN (SELECT 1);
|
|
two | Constant Select
|
|
-----+-----------------
|
|
| 1
|
|
| 1
|
|
(2 rows)
|
|
|
|
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Uncorrelated Field" FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
|
|
WHERE f1 IN (SELECT f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL);
|
|
six | Uncorrelated Field
|
|
-----+--------------------
|
|
| 1
|
|
| 2
|
|
| 3
|
|
| 1
|
|
| 2
|
|
| 3
|
|
(6 rows)
|
|
|
|
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Uncorrelated Field" FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
|
|
WHERE f1 IN (SELECT f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL WHERE
|
|
f2 IN (SELECT f1 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL));
|
|
six | Uncorrelated Field
|
|
-----+--------------------
|
|
| 1
|
|
| 2
|
|
| 3
|
|
| 1
|
|
| 2
|
|
| 3
|
|
(6 rows)
|
|
|
|
SELECT '' AS three, f1, f2
|
|
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
|
|
WHERE (f1, f2) NOT IN (SELECT f2, CAST(f3 AS int4) FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
|
|
WHERE f3 IS NOT NULL);
|
|
three | f1 | f2
|
|
-------+----+----
|
|
| 1 | 2
|
|
| 6 | 7
|
|
| 8 | 9
|
|
(3 rows)
|
|
|
|
-- Correlated subselects
|
|
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Correlated Field", f2 AS "Second Field"
|
|
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL upper
|
|
WHERE f1 IN (SELECT f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL WHERE f1 = upper.f1);
|
|
six | Correlated Field | Second Field
|
|
-----+------------------+--------------
|
|
| 1 | 2
|
|
| 2 | 3
|
|
| 3 | 4
|
|
| 1 | 1
|
|
| 2 | 2
|
|
| 3 | 3
|
|
(6 rows)
|
|
|
|
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Correlated Field", f3 AS "Second Field"
|
|
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL upper
|
|
WHERE f1 IN
|
|
(SELECT f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL WHERE CAST(upper.f2 AS float) = f3);
|
|
six | Correlated Field | Second Field
|
|
-----+------------------+--------------
|
|
| 2 | 4
|
|
| 3 | 5
|
|
| 1 | 1
|
|
| 2 | 2
|
|
| 3 | 3
|
|
(5 rows)
|
|
|
|
SELECT '' AS six, f1 AS "Correlated Field", f3 AS "Second Field"
|
|
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL upper
|
|
WHERE f3 IN (SELECT upper.f1 + f2 FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
|
|
WHERE f2 = CAST(f3 AS integer));
|
|
six | Correlated Field | Second Field
|
|
-----+------------------+--------------
|
|
| 1 | 3
|
|
| 2 | 4
|
|
| 3 | 5
|
|
| 6 | 8
|
|
(4 rows)
|
|
|
|
SELECT '' AS five, f1 AS "Correlated Field"
|
|
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
|
|
WHERE (f1, f2) IN (SELECT f2, CAST(f3 AS int4) FROM SUBSELECT_TBL
|
|
WHERE f3 IS NOT NULL);
|
|
five | Correlated Field
|
|
------+------------------
|
|
| 2
|
|
| 3
|
|
| 1
|
|
| 2
|
|
| 3
|
|
(5 rows)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Use some existing tables in the regression test
|
|
--
|
|
SELECT '' AS eight, ss.f1 AS "Correlated Field", ss.f3 AS "Second Field"
|
|
FROM SUBSELECT_TBL ss
|
|
WHERE f1 NOT IN (SELECT f1+1 FROM INT4_TBL
|
|
WHERE f1 != ss.f1 AND f1 < 2147483647);
|
|
eight | Correlated Field | Second Field
|
|
-------+------------------+--------------
|
|
| 2 | 4
|
|
| 3 | 5
|
|
| 2 | 2
|
|
| 3 | 3
|
|
| 6 | 8
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
(6 rows)
|
|
|
|
select q1, float8(count(*)) / (select count(*) from int8_tbl)
|
|
from int8_tbl group by q1 order by q1;
|
|
q1 | ?column?
|
|
------------------+----------
|
|
123 | 0.4
|
|
4567890123456789 | 0.6
|
|
(2 rows)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Test cases to catch unpleasant interactions between IN-join processing
|
|
-- and subquery pullup.
|
|
--
|
|
select count(*) from
|
|
(select 1 from tenk1 a
|
|
where unique1 IN (select hundred from tenk1 b)) ss;
|
|
count
|
|
-------
|
|
100
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
select count(distinct ss.ten) from
|
|
(select ten from tenk1 a
|
|
where unique1 IN (select hundred from tenk1 b)) ss;
|
|
count
|
|
-------
|
|
10
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
select count(*) from
|
|
(select 1 from tenk1 a
|
|
where unique1 IN (select distinct hundred from tenk1 b)) ss;
|
|
count
|
|
-------
|
|
100
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
select count(distinct ss.ten) from
|
|
(select ten from tenk1 a
|
|
where unique1 IN (select distinct hundred from tenk1 b)) ss;
|
|
count
|
|
-------
|
|
10
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Test cases to check for overenthusiastic optimization of
|
|
-- "IN (SELECT DISTINCT ...)" and related cases. Per example from
|
|
-- Luca Pireddu and Michael Fuhr.
|
|
--
|
|
CREATE TEMP TABLE foo (id integer);
|
|
CREATE TEMP TABLE bar (id1 integer, id2 integer);
|
|
INSERT INTO foo VALUES (1);
|
|
INSERT INTO bar VALUES (1, 1);
|
|
INSERT INTO bar VALUES (2, 2);
|
|
INSERT INTO bar VALUES (3, 1);
|
|
-- These cases require an extra level of distinct-ing above subquery s
|
|
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
|
|
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT DISTINCT id1, id2 FROM bar) AS s);
|
|
id
|
|
----
|
|
1
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
|
|
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT id1,id2 FROM bar GROUP BY id1,id2) AS s);
|
|
id
|
|
----
|
|
1
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
|
|
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT id1, id2 FROM bar UNION
|
|
SELECT id1, id2 FROM bar) AS s);
|
|
id
|
|
----
|
|
1
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
-- These cases do not
|
|
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
|
|
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT DISTINCT ON (id2) id1, id2 FROM bar) AS s);
|
|
id
|
|
----
|
|
1
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
|
|
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT id2 FROM bar GROUP BY id2) AS s);
|
|
id
|
|
----
|
|
1
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE id IN
|
|
(SELECT id2 FROM (SELECT id2 FROM bar UNION
|
|
SELECT id2 FROM bar) AS s);
|
|
id
|
|
----
|
|
1
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Test case to catch problems with multiply nested sub-SELECTs not getting
|
|
-- recalculated properly. Per bug report from Didier Moens.
|
|
--
|
|
CREATE TABLE orderstest (
|
|
approver_ref integer,
|
|
po_ref integer,
|
|
ordercancelled boolean
|
|
);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (1, 1, false);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 5, false);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 6, false);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 7, false);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 1, true);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 8, false);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 1, false);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (77, 1, false);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (1, 1, false);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (66, 1, false);
|
|
INSERT INTO orderstest VALUES (1, 1, false);
|
|
CREATE VIEW orders_view AS
|
|
SELECT *,
|
|
(SELECT CASE
|
|
WHEN ord.approver_ref=1 THEN '---' ELSE 'Approved'
|
|
END) AS "Approved",
|
|
(SELECT CASE
|
|
WHEN ord.ordercancelled
|
|
THEN 'Cancelled'
|
|
ELSE
|
|
(SELECT CASE
|
|
WHEN ord.po_ref=1
|
|
THEN
|
|
(SELECT CASE
|
|
WHEN ord.approver_ref=1
|
|
THEN '---'
|
|
ELSE 'Approved'
|
|
END)
|
|
ELSE 'PO'
|
|
END)
|
|
END) AS "Status",
|
|
(CASE
|
|
WHEN ord.ordercancelled
|
|
THEN 'Cancelled'
|
|
ELSE
|
|
(CASE
|
|
WHEN ord.po_ref=1
|
|
THEN
|
|
(CASE
|
|
WHEN ord.approver_ref=1
|
|
THEN '---'
|
|
ELSE 'Approved'
|
|
END)
|
|
ELSE 'PO'
|
|
END)
|
|
END) AS "Status_OK"
|
|
FROM orderstest ord;
|
|
SELECT * FROM orders_view;
|
|
approver_ref | po_ref | ordercancelled | Approved | Status | Status_OK
|
|
--------------+--------+----------------+----------+-----------+-----------
|
|
1 | 1 | f | --- | --- | ---
|
|
66 | 5 | f | Approved | PO | PO
|
|
66 | 6 | f | Approved | PO | PO
|
|
66 | 7 | f | Approved | PO | PO
|
|
66 | 1 | t | Approved | Cancelled | Cancelled
|
|
66 | 8 | f | Approved | PO | PO
|
|
66 | 1 | f | Approved | Approved | Approved
|
|
77 | 1 | f | Approved | Approved | Approved
|
|
1 | 1 | f | --- | --- | ---
|
|
66 | 1 | f | Approved | Approved | Approved
|
|
1 | 1 | f | --- | --- | ---
|
|
(11 rows)
|
|
|
|
DROP TABLE orderstest cascade;
|
|
NOTICE: drop cascades to view orders_view
|
|
--
|
|
-- Test cases to catch situations where rule rewriter fails to propagate
|
|
-- hasSubLinks flag correctly. Per example from Kyle Bateman.
|
|
--
|
|
create temp table parts (
|
|
partnum text,
|
|
cost float8
|
|
);
|
|
create temp table shipped (
|
|
ttype char(2),
|
|
ordnum int4,
|
|
partnum text,
|
|
value float8
|
|
);
|
|
create temp view shipped_view as
|
|
select * from shipped where ttype = 'wt';
|
|
create rule shipped_view_insert as on insert to shipped_view do instead
|
|
insert into shipped values('wt', new.ordnum, new.partnum, new.value);
|
|
insert into parts (partnum, cost) values (1, 1234.56);
|
|
insert into shipped_view (ordnum, partnum, value)
|
|
values (0, 1, (select cost from parts where partnum = '1'));
|
|
select * from shipped_view;
|
|
ttype | ordnum | partnum | value
|
|
-------+--------+---------+---------
|
|
wt | 0 | 1 | 1234.56
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
create rule shipped_view_update as on update to shipped_view do instead
|
|
update shipped set partnum = new.partnum, value = new.value
|
|
where ttype = new.ttype and ordnum = new.ordnum;
|
|
update shipped_view set value = 11
|
|
from int4_tbl a join int4_tbl b
|
|
on (a.f1 = (select f1 from int4_tbl c where c.f1=b.f1))
|
|
where ordnum = a.f1;
|
|
select * from shipped_view;
|
|
ttype | ordnum | partnum | value
|
|
-------+--------+---------+-------
|
|
wt | 0 | 1 | 11
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
select f1, ss1 as relabel from
|
|
(select *, (select sum(f1) from int4_tbl b where f1 >= a.f1) as ss1
|
|
from int4_tbl a) ss;
|
|
f1 | relabel
|
|
-------------+------------
|
|
0 | 2147607103
|
|
123456 | 2147607103
|
|
-123456 | 2147483647
|
|
2147483647 | 2147483647
|
|
-2147483647 | 0
|
|
(5 rows)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Test cases involving PARAM_EXEC parameters and min/max index optimizations.
|
|
-- Per bug report from David Sanchez i Gregori.
|
|
--
|
|
select * from (
|
|
select max(unique1) from tenk1 as a
|
|
where exists (select 1 from tenk1 as b where b.thousand = a.unique2)
|
|
) ss;
|
|
max
|
|
------
|
|
9997
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
select * from (
|
|
select min(unique1) from tenk1 as a
|
|
where not exists (select 1 from tenk1 as b where b.unique2 = 10000)
|
|
) ss;
|
|
min
|
|
-----
|
|
0
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Test that an IN implemented using a UniquePath does unique-ification
|
|
-- with the right semantics, as per bug #4113. (Unfortunately we have
|
|
-- no simple way to ensure that this test case actually chooses that type
|
|
-- of plan, but it does in releases 7.4-8.3. Note that an ordering difference
|
|
-- here might mean that some other plan type is being used, rendering the test
|
|
-- pointless.)
|
|
--
|
|
create temp table numeric_table (num_col numeric);
|
|
insert into numeric_table values (1), (1.000000000000000000001), (2), (3);
|
|
create temp table float_table (float_col float8);
|
|
insert into float_table values (1), (2), (3);
|
|
select * from float_table
|
|
where float_col in (select num_col from numeric_table);
|
|
float_col
|
|
-----------
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
(3 rows)
|
|
|
|
select * from numeric_table
|
|
where num_col in (select float_col from float_table);
|
|
num_col
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
1
|
|
1.000000000000000000001
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
(4 rows)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Test case for bug #4290: bogus calculation of subplan param sets
|
|
--
|
|
create temp table ta (id int primary key, val int);
|
|
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "ta_pkey" for table "ta"
|
|
insert into ta values(1,1);
|
|
insert into ta values(2,2);
|
|
create temp table tb (id int primary key, aval int);
|
|
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "tb_pkey" for table "tb"
|
|
insert into tb values(1,1);
|
|
insert into tb values(2,1);
|
|
insert into tb values(3,2);
|
|
insert into tb values(4,2);
|
|
create temp table tc (id int primary key, aid int);
|
|
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "tc_pkey" for table "tc"
|
|
insert into tc values(1,1);
|
|
insert into tc values(2,2);
|
|
select
|
|
( select min(tb.id) from tb
|
|
where tb.aval = (select ta.val from ta where ta.id = tc.aid) ) as min_tb_id
|
|
from tc;
|
|
min_tb_id
|
|
-----------
|
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
(2 rows)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Test case for 8.3 "failed to locate grouping columns" bug
|
|
--
|
|
create temp table t1 (f1 numeric(14,0), f2 varchar(30));
|
|
select * from
|
|
(select distinct f1, f2, (select f2 from t1 x where x.f1 = up.f1) as fs
|
|
from t1 up) ss
|
|
group by f1,f2,fs;
|
|
f1 | f2 | fs
|
|
----+----+----
|
|
(0 rows)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-- Test case for bug #5514 (mishandling of whole-row Vars in subselects)
|
|
--
|
|
create temp table table_a(id integer);
|
|
insert into table_a values (42);
|
|
create temp view view_a as select * from table_a;
|
|
select view_a from view_a;
|
|
view_a
|
|
--------
|
|
(42)
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
select (select view_a) from view_a;
|
|
?column?
|
|
----------
|
|
(42)
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
select (select (select view_a)) from view_a;
|
|
?column?
|
|
----------
|
|
(42)
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|
|
select (select (a.*)::text) from view_a a;
|
|
?column?
|
|
----------
|
|
(42)
|
|
(1 row)
|
|
|