mirror of
https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
synced 2024-09-01 03:47:24 +02:00
8d83a5d0a2
Avoid explicitly grouping by columns that we know are redundant for sorting, for example we need group by only one of x and y in SELECT ... WHERE x = y GROUP BY x, y This comes up more often than you might think, as shown by the changes in the regression tests. It's nearly free to detect too, since we are just piggybacking on the existing logic that detects redundant pathkeys. (In some of the existing plans that change, it's visible that a sort step preceding the grouping step already didn't bother to sort by the redundant column, making the old plan a bit silly-looking.) To do this, build processed_groupClause and processed_distinctClause lists that omit any provably-redundant sort items, and consult those not the originals where relevant. This means that within the planner, one should usually consult root->processed_groupClause or root->processed_distinctClause if one wants to know which columns are to be grouped on; but to check whether grouping or distinct-ing is happening at all, check non-NIL-ness of parse->groupClause or parse->distinctClause. This is comparable to longstanding rules about handling the HAVING clause, so I don't think it'll be a huge maintenance problem. nodeAgg.c also needs minor mods, because it's now possible to generate AGG_PLAIN and AGG_SORTED Agg nodes with zero grouping columns. Patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo and David Rowley for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/185315.1672179489@sss.pgh.pa.us |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| data | ||
| expected | ||
| sql | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| Makefile | ||
| meson.build | ||
| pg_trgm--1.0--1.1.sql | ||
| pg_trgm--1.1--1.2.sql | ||
| pg_trgm--1.2--1.3.sql | ||
| pg_trgm--1.3--1.4.sql | ||
| pg_trgm--1.3.sql | ||
| pg_trgm--1.4--1.5.sql | ||
| pg_trgm--1.5--1.6.sql | ||
| pg_trgm.control | ||
| trgm_gin.c | ||
| trgm_gist.c | ||
| trgm_op.c | ||
| trgm_regexp.c | ||
| trgm.h | ||