postgresql/src/include/access/spgist.h

229 lines
7.6 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* spgist.h
* Public header file for SP-GiST access method.
*
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2019, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* src/include/access/spgist.h
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#ifndef SPGIST_H
#define SPGIST_H
#include "access/amapi.h"
Revamp the WAL record format. Each WAL record now carries information about the modified relation and block(s) in a standardized format. That makes it easier to write tools that need that information, like pg_rewind, prefetching the blocks to speed up recovery, etc. There's a whole new API for building WAL records, replacing the XLogRecData chains used previously. The new API consists of XLogRegister* functions, which are called for each buffer and chunk of data that is added to the record. The new API also gives more control over when a full-page image is written, by passing flags to the XLogRegisterBuffer function. This also simplifies the XLogReadBufferForRedo() calls. The function can dig the relation and block number from the WAL record, so they no longer need to be passed as arguments. For the convenience of redo routines, XLogReader now disects each WAL record after reading it, copying the main data part and the per-block data into MAXALIGNed buffers. The data chunks are not aligned within the WAL record, but the redo routines can assume that the pointers returned by XLogRecGet* functions are. Redo routines are now passed the XLogReaderState, which contains the record in the already-disected format, instead of the plain XLogRecord. The new record format also makes the fixed size XLogRecord header smaller, by removing the xl_len field. The length of the "main data" portion is now stored at the end of the WAL record, and there's a separate header after XLogRecord for it. The alignment padding at the end of XLogRecord is also removed. This compansates for the fact that the new format would otherwise be more bulky than the old format. Reviewed by Andres Freund, Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera, Fujii Masao.
2014-11-20 16:56:26 +01:00
#include "access/xlogreader.h"
#include "fmgr.h"
#include "lib/stringinfo.h"
/* reloption parameters */
#define SPGIST_MIN_FILLFACTOR 10
#define SPGIST_DEFAULT_FILLFACTOR 80
/* SPGiST opclass support function numbers */
#define SPGIST_CONFIG_PROC 1
#define SPGIST_CHOOSE_PROC 2
#define SPGIST_PICKSPLIT_PROC 3
#define SPGIST_INNER_CONSISTENT_PROC 4
#define SPGIST_LEAF_CONSISTENT_PROC 5
#define SPGIST_COMPRESS_PROC 6
#define SPGISTNRequiredProc 5
#define SPGISTNProc 6
/*
* Argument structs for spg_config method
*/
typedef struct spgConfigIn
{
Oid attType; /* Data type to be indexed */
} spgConfigIn;
typedef struct spgConfigOut
{
Oid prefixType; /* Data type of inner-tuple prefixes */
Oid labelType; /* Data type of inner-tuple node labels */
Oid leafType; /* Data type of leaf-tuple values */
bool canReturnData; /* Opclass can reconstruct original data */
bool longValuesOK; /* Opclass can cope with values > 1 page */
} spgConfigOut;
/*
* Argument structs for spg_choose method
*/
typedef struct spgChooseIn
{
Datum datum; /* original datum to be indexed */
Datum leafDatum; /* current datum to be stored at leaf */
int level; /* current level (counting from zero) */
/* Data from current inner tuple */
bool allTheSame; /* tuple is marked all-the-same? */
bool hasPrefix; /* tuple has a prefix? */
Datum prefixDatum; /* if so, the prefix value */
int nNodes; /* number of nodes in the inner tuple */
Datum *nodeLabels; /* node label values (NULL if none) */
} spgChooseIn;
typedef enum spgChooseResultType
{
spgMatchNode = 1, /* descend into existing node */
spgAddNode, /* add a node to the inner tuple */
spgSplitTuple /* split inner tuple (change its prefix) */
} spgChooseResultType;
typedef struct spgChooseOut
{
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
spgChooseResultType resultType; /* action code, see above */
union
{
struct /* results for spgMatchNode */
{
int nodeN; /* descend to this node (index from 0) */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
int levelAdd; /* increment level by this much */
Datum restDatum; /* new leaf datum */
} matchNode;
struct /* results for spgAddNode */
{
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
Datum nodeLabel; /* new node's label */
int nodeN; /* where to insert it (index from 0) */
} addNode;
struct /* results for spgSplitTuple */
{
/* Info to form new upper-level inner tuple with one child tuple */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
bool prefixHasPrefix; /* tuple should have a prefix? */
Datum prefixPrefixDatum; /* if so, its value */
int prefixNNodes; /* number of nodes */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
Datum *prefixNodeLabels; /* their labels (or NULL for no
* labels) */
int childNodeN; /* which node gets child tuple */
/* Info to form new lower-level inner tuple with all old nodes */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
bool postfixHasPrefix; /* tuple should have a prefix? */
Datum postfixPrefixDatum; /* if so, its value */
} splitTuple;
} result;
} spgChooseOut;
/*
* Argument structs for spg_picksplit method
*/
typedef struct spgPickSplitIn
{
int nTuples; /* number of leaf tuples */
Datum *datums; /* their datums (array of length nTuples) */
int level; /* current level (counting from zero) */
} spgPickSplitIn;
typedef struct spgPickSplitOut
{
bool hasPrefix; /* new inner tuple should have a prefix? */
Datum prefixDatum; /* if so, its value */
int nNodes; /* number of nodes for new inner tuple */
Datum *nodeLabels; /* their labels (or NULL for no labels) */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
int *mapTuplesToNodes; /* node index for each leaf tuple */
Datum *leafTupleDatums; /* datum to store in each new leaf tuple */
} spgPickSplitOut;
/*
* Argument structs for spg_inner_consistent method
*/
typedef struct spgInnerConsistentIn
{
ScanKey scankeys; /* array of operators and comparison values */
ScanKey orderbys; /* array of ordering operators and comparison
* values */
int nkeys; /* length of scankeys array */
int norderbys; /* length of orderbys array */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
Datum reconstructedValue; /* value reconstructed at parent */
void *traversalValue; /* opclass-specific traverse value */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
MemoryContext traversalMemoryContext; /* put new traverse values here */
int level; /* current level (counting from zero) */
bool returnData; /* original data must be returned? */
/* Data from current inner tuple */
bool allTheSame; /* tuple is marked all-the-same? */
bool hasPrefix; /* tuple has a prefix? */
Datum prefixDatum; /* if so, the prefix value */
int nNodes; /* number of nodes in the inner tuple */
Datum *nodeLabels; /* node label values (NULL if none) */
} spgInnerConsistentIn;
typedef struct spgInnerConsistentOut
{
int nNodes; /* number of child nodes to be visited */
int *nodeNumbers; /* their indexes in the node array */
int *levelAdds; /* increment level by this much for each */
Datum *reconstructedValues; /* associated reconstructed values */
void **traversalValues; /* opclass-specific traverse values */
double **distances; /* associated distances */
} spgInnerConsistentOut;
/*
* Argument structs for spg_leaf_consistent method
*/
typedef struct spgLeafConsistentIn
{
ScanKey scankeys; /* array of operators and comparison values */
ScanKey orderbys; /* array of ordering operators and comparison
* values */
int nkeys; /* length of scankeys array */
int norderbys; /* length of orderbys array */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
Datum reconstructedValue; /* value reconstructed at parent */
void *traversalValue; /* opclass-specific traverse value */
int level; /* current level (counting from zero) */
bool returnData; /* original data must be returned? */
Datum leafDatum; /* datum in leaf tuple */
} spgLeafConsistentIn;
typedef struct spgLeafConsistentOut
{
Datum leafValue; /* reconstructed original data, if any */
bool recheck; /* set true if operator must be rechecked */
bool recheckDistances; /* set true if distances must be rechecked */
double *distances; /* associated distances */
} spgLeafConsistentOut;
/* spgutils.c */
extern bytea *spgoptions(Datum reloptions, bool validate);
/* spginsert.c */
extern IndexBuildResult *spgbuild(Relation heap, Relation index,
struct IndexInfo *indexInfo);
extern void spgbuildempty(Relation index);
extern bool spginsert(Relation index, Datum *values, bool *isnull,
ItemPointer ht_ctid, Relation heapRel,
IndexUniqueCheck checkUnique,
struct IndexInfo *indexInfo);
/* spgscan.c */
extern IndexScanDesc spgbeginscan(Relation rel, int keysz, int orderbysz);
extern void spgendscan(IndexScanDesc scan);
extern void spgrescan(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanKey scankey, int nscankeys,
ScanKey orderbys, int norderbys);
extern int64 spggetbitmap(IndexScanDesc scan, TIDBitmap *tbm);
extern bool spggettuple(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection dir);
extern bool spgcanreturn(Relation index, int attno);
/* spgvacuum.c */
extern IndexBulkDeleteResult *spgbulkdelete(IndexVacuumInfo *info,
IndexBulkDeleteResult *stats,
IndexBulkDeleteCallback callback,
void *callback_state);
extern IndexBulkDeleteResult *spgvacuumcleanup(IndexVacuumInfo *info,
IndexBulkDeleteResult *stats);
/* spgvalidate.c */
extern bool spgvalidate(Oid opclassoid);
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* SPGIST_H */