postgresql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c

595 lines
15 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* prepqual.c
* Routines for preprocessing qualification expressions
*
2003-08-04 04:40:20 +02:00
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2003, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c,v 1.43 2004/05/30 23:40:29 neilc Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#include "postgres.h"
1999-07-16 07:00:38 +02:00
#include "nodes/makefuncs.h"
#include "optimizer/clauses.h"
#include "optimizer/prep.h"
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
static Node *flatten_andors_mutator(Node *node, void *context);
static void flatten_andors_and_walker(FastList *out_list, List *andlist);
static void flatten_andors_or_walker(FastList *out_list, List *orlist);
static List *pull_ands(List *andlist);
static void pull_ands_walker(FastList *out_list, List *andlist);
static List *pull_ors(List *orlist);
static void pull_ors_walker(FastList *out_list, List *orlist);
static Expr *find_nots(Expr *qual);
static Expr *push_nots(Expr *qual);
static Expr *find_duplicate_ors(Expr *qual);
static Expr *process_duplicate_ors(List *orlist);
/*
* canonicalize_qual
* Convert a qualification expression to the most useful form.
*
* The name of this routine is a holdover from a time when it would try to
* force the expression into canonical AND-of-ORs or OR-of-ANDs form.
* Eventually, we recognized that that had more theoretical purity than
* actual usefulness, and so now the transformation doesn't involve any
* notion of reaching a canonical form.
*
* Returns the modified qualification.
*/
Expr *
canonicalize_qual(Expr *qual)
{
Expr *newqual;
/* Quick exit for empty qual */
if (qual == NULL)
return NULL;
/*
* Flatten AND and OR groups throughout the expression tree.
*/
newqual = (Expr *) flatten_andors((Node *) qual);
/*
* Push down NOTs. We do this only in the top-level boolean
* expression, without examining arguments of operators/functions.
* The main reason for doing this is to expose as much top-level AND/OR
* structure as we can, so there's no point in descending further.
*/
newqual = find_nots(newqual);
/*
* Pull up redundant subclauses in OR-of-AND trees. Again, we do this
* only within the top-level AND/OR structure.
*/
newqual = find_duplicate_ors(newqual);
return newqual;
}
/*--------------------
* The parser regards AND and OR as purely binary operators, so a qual like
* (A = 1) OR (A = 2) OR (A = 3) ...
* will produce a nested parsetree
* (OR (A = 1) (OR (A = 2) (OR (A = 3) ...)))
* In reality, the optimizer and executor regard AND and OR as n-argument
* operators, so this tree can be flattened to
* (OR (A = 1) (A = 2) (A = 3) ...)
* which is the responsibility of the routines below.
*
* flatten_andors() does the basic transformation with no initial assumptions.
* pull_ands() and pull_ors() are used to maintain flatness of the AND/OR
* tree after local transformations that might introduce nested AND/ORs.
*--------------------
*/
/*
* flatten_andors
* Given an expression tree, simplify nested AND/OR clauses into flat
* AND/OR clauses with more arguments. The entire tree is processed.
*
* Returns the rebuilt expr (note original structure is not touched).
*
* This is exported so that other modules can perform the part of
* canonicalize_qual processing that applies to entire trees, rather
* than just the top-level boolean expressions.
*/
Node *
flatten_andors(Node *node)
{
return flatten_andors_mutator(node, NULL);
}
static Node *
flatten_andors_mutator(Node *node, void *context)
{
if (node == NULL)
return NULL;
if (IsA(node, BoolExpr))
{
BoolExpr *bexpr = (BoolExpr *) node;
if (bexpr->boolop == AND_EXPR)
{
FastList out_list;
FastListInit(&out_list);
flatten_andors_and_walker(&out_list, bexpr->args);
return (Node *) make_andclause(FastListValue(&out_list));
}
if (bexpr->boolop == OR_EXPR)
{
FastList out_list;
FastListInit(&out_list);
flatten_andors_or_walker(&out_list, bexpr->args);
return (Node *) make_orclause(FastListValue(&out_list));
}
/* else it's a NOT clause, fall through */
}
return expression_tree_mutator(node, flatten_andors_mutator, context);
}
static void
flatten_andors_and_walker(FastList *out_list, List *andlist)
{
ListCell *arg;
foreach(arg, andlist)
{
Node *subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(arg);
if (and_clause(subexpr))
flatten_andors_and_walker(out_list, ((BoolExpr *) subexpr)->args);
else
FastAppend(out_list, flatten_andors(subexpr));
}
}
static void
flatten_andors_or_walker(FastList *out_list, List *orlist)
{
ListCell *arg;
foreach(arg, orlist)
{
Node *subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(arg);
if (or_clause(subexpr))
flatten_andors_or_walker(out_list, ((BoolExpr *) subexpr)->args);
else
FastAppend(out_list, flatten_andors(subexpr));
}
}
/*
* pull_ands
* Recursively flatten nested AND clauses into a single and-clause list.
*
* Input is the arglist of an AND clause.
* Returns the rebuilt arglist (note original list structure is not touched).
*/
static List *
pull_ands(List *andlist)
{
FastList out_list;
FastListInit(&out_list);
pull_ands_walker(&out_list, andlist);
return FastListValue(&out_list);
}
static void
pull_ands_walker(FastList *out_list, List *andlist)
{
ListCell *arg;
foreach(arg, andlist)
{
Node *subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(arg);
if (and_clause(subexpr))
pull_ands_walker(out_list, ((BoolExpr *) subexpr)->args);
else
FastAppend(out_list, subexpr);
}
}
/*
* pull_ors
* Recursively flatten nested OR clauses into a single or-clause list.
*
* Input is the arglist of an OR clause.
* Returns the rebuilt arglist (note original list structure is not touched).
*/
static List *
pull_ors(List *orlist)
{
FastList out_list;
FastListInit(&out_list);
pull_ors_walker(&out_list, orlist);
return FastListValue(&out_list);
}
static void
pull_ors_walker(FastList *out_list, List *orlist)
{
ListCell *arg;
foreach(arg, orlist)
{
Node *subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(arg);
if (or_clause(subexpr))
pull_ors_walker(out_list, ((BoolExpr *) subexpr)->args);
else
FastAppend(out_list, subexpr);
}
}
/*
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
* find_nots
* Traverse the qualification, looking for NOTs to take care of.
* For NOT clauses, apply push_nots() to try to push down the NOT.
* For AND and OR clause types, simply recurse. Otherwise stop
* recursing (we do not worry about structure below the top AND/OR tree).
*
* Returns the modified qualification. AND/OR flatness is preserved.
*/
static Expr *
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
find_nots(Expr *qual)
{
if (qual == NULL)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return NULL;
if (and_clause((Node *) qual))
{
FastList t_list;
ListCell *temp;
FastListInit(&t_list);
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) qual)->args)
FastAppend(&t_list, find_nots(lfirst(temp)));
return make_andclause(pull_ands(FastListValue(&t_list)));
}
else if (or_clause((Node *) qual))
{
FastList t_list;
ListCell *temp;
FastListInit(&t_list);
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) qual)->args)
FastAppend(&t_list, find_nots(lfirst(temp)));
return make_orclause(pull_ors(FastListValue(&t_list)));
}
else if (not_clause((Node *) qual))
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
return push_nots(get_notclausearg(qual));
else
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return qual;
}
/*
* push_nots
* Push down a NOT as far as possible.
*
* Input is an expression to be negated (e.g., the argument of a NOT clause).
* Returns a new qual equivalent to the negation of the given qual.
*/
static Expr *
push_nots(Expr *qual)
{
if (qual == NULL)
return make_notclause(qual); /* XXX is this right? Or
* possible? */
/*
* Negate an operator clause if possible: (NOT (< A B)) => (> A B)
* Otherwise, retain the clause as it is (the NOT can't be pushed
* down any farther).
*/
if (is_opclause(qual))
{
OpExpr *opexpr = (OpExpr *) qual;
Oid negator = get_negator(opexpr->opno);
if (negator)
return make_opclause(negator,
opexpr->opresulttype,
opexpr->opretset,
(Expr *) get_leftop(qual),
(Expr *) get_rightop(qual));
else
return make_notclause(qual);
}
else if (and_clause((Node *) qual))
{
/*--------------------
* Apply DeMorgan's Laws:
* (NOT (AND A B)) => (OR (NOT A) (NOT B))
* (NOT (OR A B)) => (AND (NOT A) (NOT B))
* i.e., swap AND for OR and negate all the subclauses.
*--------------------
*/
FastList t_list;
ListCell *temp;
FastListInit(&t_list);
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) qual)->args)
FastAppend(&t_list, push_nots(lfirst(temp)));
return make_orclause(pull_ors(FastListValue(&t_list)));
}
else if (or_clause((Node *) qual))
{
FastList t_list;
ListCell *temp;
FastListInit(&t_list);
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) qual)->args)
FastAppend(&t_list, push_nots(lfirst(temp)));
return make_andclause(pull_ands(FastListValue(&t_list)));
}
else if (not_clause((Node *) qual))
{
/*
* Another NOT cancels this NOT, so eliminate the NOT and
* stop negating this branch.
*/
return get_notclausearg(qual);
}
else
{
/*
* We don't know how to negate anything else, place a NOT at
* this level.
*/
return make_notclause(qual);
}
}
/*--------------------
* The following code attempts to apply the inverse OR distributive law:
* ((A AND B) OR (A AND C)) => (A AND (B OR C))
* That is, locate OR clauses in which every subclause contains an
* identical term, and pull out the duplicated terms.
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
*
* This may seem like a fairly useless activity, but it turns out to be
* applicable to many machine-generated queries, and there are also queries
* in some of the TPC benchmarks that need it. This was in fact almost the
* sole useful side-effect of the old prepqual code that tried to force
* the query into canonical AND-of-ORs form: the canonical equivalent of
* ((A AND B) OR (A AND C))
* is
* ((A OR A) AND (A OR C) AND (B OR A) AND (B OR C))
* which the code was able to simplify to
* (A AND (A OR C) AND (B OR A) AND (B OR C))
* thus successfully extracting the common condition A --- but at the cost
* of cluttering the qual with many redundant clauses.
*--------------------
*/
/*
* find_duplicate_ors
* Given a qualification tree with the NOTs pushed down, search for
* OR clauses to which the inverse OR distributive law might apply.
* Only the top-level AND/OR structure is searched.
*
* Returns the modified qualification. AND/OR flatness is preserved.
*/
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
static Expr *
find_duplicate_ors(Expr *qual)
{
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
if (qual == NULL)
return NULL;
if (or_clause((Node *) qual))
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
{
List *orlist = NIL;
ListCell *temp;
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
/* Recurse */
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) qual)->args)
orlist = lappend(orlist, find_duplicate_ors(lfirst(temp)));
/*
* Don't need pull_ors() since this routine will never introduce
* an OR where there wasn't one before.
*/
return process_duplicate_ors(orlist);
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
}
else if (and_clause((Node *) qual))
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
{
List *andlist = NIL;
ListCell *temp;
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
/* Recurse */
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) qual)->args)
andlist = lappend(andlist, find_duplicate_ors(lfirst(temp)));
/* Flatten any ANDs introduced just below here */
andlist = pull_ands(andlist);
/* The AND list can't get shorter, so result is always an AND */
return make_andclause(andlist);
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
}
else
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
return qual;
}
/*
* process_duplicate_ors
* Given a list of exprs which are ORed together, try to apply
* the inverse OR distributive law.
*
* Returns the resulting expression (could be an AND clause, an OR
* clause, or maybe even a single subexpression).
*/
static Expr *
process_duplicate_ors(List *orlist)
{
List *reference = NIL;
int num_subclauses = 0;
List *winners;
List *neworlist;
ListCell *temp;
if (orlist == NIL)
return NULL; /* probably can't happen */
if (list_length(orlist) == 1) /* single-expression OR (can this happen?) */
return linitial(orlist);
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
/*
* Choose the shortest AND clause as the reference list --- obviously,
* any subclause not in this clause isn't in all the clauses.
* If we find a clause that's not an AND, we can treat it as a
* one-element AND clause, which necessarily wins as shortest.
*/
foreach(temp, orlist)
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
{
Expr *clause = (Expr *) lfirst(temp);
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
if (and_clause((Node *) clause))
{
List *subclauses = ((BoolExpr *) clause)->args;
int nclauses = list_length(subclauses);
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
if (reference == NIL || nclauses < num_subclauses)
{
reference = subclauses;
num_subclauses = nclauses;
}
}
else
{
reference = list_make1(clause);
break;
}
}
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
/*
* Just in case, eliminate any duplicates in the reference list.
*/
reference = list_union(NIL, reference);
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
/*
* Check each element of the reference list to see if it's in all the
* OR clauses. Build a new list of winning clauses.
*/
winners = NIL;
foreach(temp, reference)
{
Expr *refclause = (Expr *) lfirst(temp);
bool win = true;
ListCell *temp2;
foreach(temp2, orlist)
{
Expr *clause = (Expr *) lfirst(temp2);
if (and_clause((Node *) clause))
{
if (!list_member(((BoolExpr *) clause)->args, refclause))
{
win = false;
break;
}
}
else
{
if (!equal(refclause, clause))
{
win = false;
break;
}
}
}
if (win)
winners = lappend(winners, refclause);
}
/*
* If no winners, we can't transform the OR
*/
if (winners == NIL)
return make_orclause(orlist);
1998-10-04 05:30:56 +02:00
/*
* Generate new OR list consisting of the remaining sub-clauses.
*
* If any clause degenerates to empty, then we have a situation like
* (A AND B) OR (A), which can be reduced to just A --- that is, the
* additional conditions in other arms of the OR are irrelevant.
*
* Note that because we use list_difference, any multiple occurrences of
* a winning clause in an AND sub-clause will be removed automatically.
*/
neworlist = NIL;
foreach(temp, orlist)
{
Expr *clause = (Expr *) lfirst(temp);
if (and_clause((Node *) clause))
{
List *subclauses = ((BoolExpr *) clause)->args;
subclauses = list_difference(subclauses, winners);
if (subclauses != NIL)
{
if (list_length(subclauses) == 1)
neworlist = lappend(neworlist, linitial(subclauses));
else
neworlist = lappend(neworlist, make_andclause(subclauses));
}
else
{
neworlist = NIL; /* degenerate case, see above */
break;
}
}
else
{
if (!list_member(winners, clause))
neworlist = lappend(neworlist, clause);
else
{
neworlist = NIL; /* degenerate case, see above */
break;
}
}
}
/*
* Append reduced OR to the winners list, if it's not degenerate, handling
* the special case of one element correctly (can that really happen?).
* Also be careful to maintain AND/OR flatness in case we pulled up a
* sub-sub-OR-clause.
*/
if (neworlist != NIL)
{
if (list_length(neworlist) == 1)
winners = lappend(winners, linitial(neworlist));
else
winners = lappend(winners, make_orclause(pull_ors(neworlist)));
}
/*
* And return the constructed AND clause, again being wary of a single
* element and AND/OR flatness.
*/
if (list_length(winners) == 1)
return (Expr *) linitial(winners);
else
return make_andclause(pull_ands(winners));
}