Since Postgres 10, SHOW commands can be triggered with replication
connections in a WAL sender context, however it missed that a
transaction context is needed for syscache lookups. This commit makes
sure that the syscache lookups can happen correctly by setting a
transaction context when running SHOW commands in a WAL sender.
Superuser-only parameters can be displayed using SHOW commands not only
to superusers, but also to members of system role pg_read_all_settings,
which requires a syscache lookup to check if the connected role is a
member of this system role or not, or the instance crashes. Superusers
do not need to check the syscache so it worked correctly in this case.
New tests are added to cover this issue.
Reported-by: Alexander Kukushkin
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15734-2daa8761eeed8e20@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 10
Commit c098509927 changed
PostgresNode::get_new_node() to probe 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1, but
the new test was less effective for Windows native Perl. This increased
the failure rate of buildfarm members bowerbird and jacana. Instead,
test 0.0.0.0 and concrete addresses. This restores the old level of
defense, but the algorithm is still subject to its longstanding time of
check to time of use race condition. Back-patch to 9.6, like the
previous change.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/GrdLgAdUK9FdyZg8VIcTDKVOkys122ZINEb3CjjoySfGj2KyPiMKTh1zqtRp0TAD7FJ27G-OBB3eplxIB5GhcQH5o8zzGZfp0MuJaXJxVxk=@yesql.se
The original coding of generate_partition_qual() just copied the list
of predicate expressions into the global CacheMemoryContext, making it
effectively impossible to clean up when the owning relcache entry is
destroyed --- the relevant code in RelationDestroyRelation() only managed
to free the topmost List header :-(. This resulted in a session-lifespan
memory leak whenever a table partition's relcache entry is rebuilt.
Fortunately, that's not normally a large data structure, and rebuilds
shouldn't occur all that often in production situations; but this is
still a bug worth fixing back to v10 where the code was introduced.
To fix, put the cached expression tree into its own small memory context,
as we do with other complicated substructures of relcache entries.
Also, deal more honestly with the case that a partition has an empty
partcheck list; while that probably isn't a case that's very interesting
for production use, it's legal.
In passing, clarify comments about how partitioning-related relcache
data structures are managed, and add some Asserts that we're not leaking
old copies when we overwrite these data fields.
Amit Langote and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7961.1552498252@sss.pgh.pa.us
postmaster startup scrutinizes any shared memory segment recorded in
postmaster.pid, exiting if that segment matches the current data
directory and has an attached process. When the postmaster.pid file was
missing, a starting postmaster used weaker checks. Change to use the
same checks in both scenarios. This increases the chance of a startup
failure, in lieu of data corruption, if the DBA does "kill -9 `head -n1
postmaster.pid` && rm postmaster.pid && pg_ctl -w start". A postmaster
will no longer stop if shmat() of an old segment fails with EACCES. A
postmaster will no longer recycle segments pertaining to other data
directories. That's good for production, but it's bad for integration
tests that crash a postmaster and immediately delete its data directory.
Such a test now leaks a segment indefinitely. No "make check-world"
test does that. win32_shmem.c already avoided all these problems. In
9.6 and later, enhance PostgresNode to facilitate testing. Back-patch
to 9.4 (all supported versions).
Reviewed (in earlier versions) by Daniel Gustafsson and Kyotaro HORIGUCHI.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190408064141.GA2016666@rfd.leadboat.com
transaction.
The transaction that is initiated by the parallel worker to cooperate
with the actual transaction started by the main backend to complete the
query execution should not be counted as a separate transaction. The
other internal transactions started and committed by the parallel worker
are still counted as separate transactions as we that is what we do in
other places like autovacuum.
This will partially fix the bloat in transaction stats due to additional
transactions performed by parallel workers. For a complete fix, we need to
decide how we want to show all the transactions that are started internally
for various operations and that is a matter of separate patch.
Reported-by: Haribabu Kommi
Author: Haribabu Kommi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Jamison Kirk and Rahila Syed
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJrrPGc9=jKXuScvNyQ+VNhO0FZk7LLAShAJRyZjnedd2D61EQ@mail.gmail.com
We've long had reports of intermittent "could not reattach to shared
memory" errors on Windows. Buildfarm member dory fails that way when
PGSharedMemoryReAttach() execution overlaps with creation of a thread
for the process's "default thread pool". Fix that by providing a second
region to receive asynchronous allocations that would otherwise intrude
into UsedShmemSegAddr. In pgwin32_ReserveSharedMemoryRegion(), stop
trying to free reservations landing at incorrect addresses; the caller's
next step has been to terminate the affected process. Back-patch to 9.4
(all supported versions).
Reviewed by Tom Lane. He also did much of the prerequisite research;
see commit bcbf2346d6.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190402135442.GA1173872@rfd.leadboat.com
join_is_legal() needs to reject forming certain outer joins in cases
where that would lead the planner down a blind alley. However, it
mistakenly supposed that the way to handle full joins was to treat them
as applying the same constraints as for left joins, only to both sides.
That doesn't work, as shown in bug #15741 from Anthony Skorski: given
a lateral reference out of a join that's fully enclosed by a full join,
the code would fail to believe that any join ordering is legal, resulting
in errors like "failed to build any N-way joins".
However, we don't really need to consider full joins at all for this
purpose, because we effectively force them to be evaluated in syntactic
order, and that order is always legal for lateral references. Hence,
get rid of this broken logic for full joins and just ignore them instead.
This seems to have been an oversight in commit 7e19db0c0.
Back-patch to all supported branches, as that was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15741-276f1f464b3f40eb@postgresql.org
When trying to insert a tuple into a partitioned table, the routing to
the correct partition has been messed up by mixing when a tuple needs to
be stored in an intermediate parent's slot and when a tuple needs to be
converted because of attribute changes between the immediate parent
relation and the parent relation one level above that (the grandparent).
This could trigger errors like the following:
ERROR: cannot extract attribute from empty tuple slot SQL state: XX000
This was not detected because regression tests with dropped attributes
only included tests with two levels of partitioning, and this can be
triggered with three levels or more.
This fixes bug #15733, which has been introduced by 34295b8. The bug
happens only on REL_11_STABLE and HEAD gains the regression tests added
for this bug.
Reported-by: Petr Fedorov
Author: Amit Langote, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15733-7692379e310b80ec@postgresql.org
pg_get_indexdef_worker carelessly fetched indoption entries even for
non-key index columns that don't have one. 99.999% of the time this
would be harmless, since the code wouldn't examine the value ... but
some fine day this will be a fetch off the end of memory, resulting
in SIGSEGV.
Detected through valgrind testing. Odd that the buildfarm's valgrind
critters haven't noticed.
Before those commits, partitioning-related code in the executor could
assume that ModifyTableState.resultRelInfo[] contains only leaf partitions.
However, now a fully-pruned update results in a dummy ModifyTable that
references the root partitioned table, and that breaks some stuff.
In v11, this led to an assertion or core dump in the tuple routing code.
Fix by disabling tuple routing, since we don't need that anyway.
(I chose to do that in HEAD as well for safety, even though the problem
doesn't manifest in HEAD as it stands.)
In v10, this confused ExecInitModifyTable's decision about whether it
needed to close the root table. But we can get rid of that altogether
by being smarter about where to find the root table.
Note that since the referenced commits haven't shipped yet, this
isn't fixing any bug the field has seen.
Amit Langote, per a report from me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20710.1554582479@sss.pgh.pa.us
The foreign-key-checking loop in ATRewriteTables failed to ignore
relations without storage (e.g., partitioned tables), unlike the
initial loop. This accidentally worked as long as RI_Initial_Check
succeeded, which it does in most practical cases (including all the
ones exercised in the existing regression tests :-(). However, if
that failed, as for instance when there are permissions issues,
then we entered the slow fire-the-trigger-on-each-tuple path.
And that would try to read from the referencing relation, and fail
if it lacks storage.
A second problem, recently introduced in HEAD, was that this loop
had been broken by sloppy refactoring for the tableam API changes.
Repair both issues, and add a regression test case so we have some
coverage on this code path. Back-patch as needed to v11.
(It looks like this code could do with additional bulletproofing,
but let's get a working test case in place first.)
Hadi Moshayedi, Tom Lane, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAK=1=WrnNmBbe5D9sm3t0a6dnAq3cdbF1vXY816j1wsMqzC8bw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19030.1554574075@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190325180405.jytoehuzkeozggxx%40alap3.anarazel.de
The limitations that it is not allowed to create/attach a foreign table
as a partition of an indexed partitioned table were not documented.
Reported-By: Stepan Yankevych
Author: Etsuro Fujita
Reviewed-By: Amit Langote
Backpatch-through: 11 where partitioned index was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1553869152.858391073.5f8m3n0x@frv53.fwdcdn.com
Since 11, it is possible to use a non-superuser role when using an
online source cluster with pg_rewind as long as the role has proper
permissions to execute on the source all the functions used by
pg_rewind, and the documentation stated that a superuser is necessary.
Let's add at the same time all the details needed to create such a
role.
A second confusion which comes a lot from users is that it is necessary
to issue a checkpoint on a freshly-promoted standby so as its control
file has up-to-date timeline information which is used by pg_rewind to
validate the operation. Let's document that properly. This is
back-patched down to 9.5 where pg_rewind has been introduced.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Magnus Hagander
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevEz5bpvbwVsYCaSMV80CBZ5-82nkMzbb+Bu=h1m=rLdn=g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.5
Buildfarm members idiacanthus and komodoensis, which share a host, both
executed this test in the same second. That failed. Back-patch to 9.6,
where the test first appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190404020543.GA1319573@rfd.leadboat.com
When $(MODULES) and $(MODULE_big) are empty, derive the database name
from the first element of $(REGRESS) instead of using a constant string.
When deriving the database name from $(MODULES), use its first element
instead of the entire list; the earlier approach would fail if any
multi-module directory had $(REGRESS) tests. Treat isolation suites and
src/pl correspondingly. Under USE_MODULE_DB=1, installcheck-world and
check-world no longer reuse any database name in a given postmaster.
Buildfarm members axolotl, mandrill and frogfish saw spurious "is being
accessed by other users" failures that would not have happened without
database name reuse. (The CountOtherDBBackends() 5s deadline expired
during DROP DATABASE; a backend for an earlier test suite had used the
same database name and had not yet exited.) Back-patch to 9.4 (all
supported versions), except bits pertaining to isolation suites.
Concept reviewed by Andrew Dunstan, Andres Freund and Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190401135213.GE891537@rfd.leadboat.com
postmaster startup scrutinizes any shared memory segment recorded in
postmaster.pid, exiting if that segment matches the current data
directory and has an attached process. When the postmaster.pid file was
missing, a starting postmaster used weaker checks. Change to use the
same checks in both scenarios. This increases the chance of a startup
failure, in lieu of data corruption, if the DBA does "kill -9 `head -n1
postmaster.pid` && rm postmaster.pid && pg_ctl -w start". A postmaster
will no longer recycle segments pertaining to other data directories.
That's good for production, but it's bad for integration tests that
crash a postmaster and immediately delete its data directory. Such a
test now leaks a segment indefinitely. No "make check-world" test does
that. win32_shmem.c already avoided all these problems. In 9.6 and
later, enhance PostgresNode to facilitate testing. Back-patch to 9.4
(all supported versions).
Reviewed by Daniel Gustafsson and Kyotaro HORIGUCHI.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20130911033341.GD225735@tornado.leadboat.com
When accessing a table with RLS via a view, the RLS checks are
performed as the view owner. However, the code neglected to propagate
that to any subqueries in the RLS checks. Fix that by calling
setRuleCheckAsUser() for all RLS policy quals and withCheckOption
checks for RTEs with RLS.
Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was added.
Per bug #15708 from daurnimator.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15708-d65cab2ce9b1717a@postgresql.org
One should almost always terminate an old process, not use a manual
removal tool like ipcrm. Removal of the ipcclean script eleven years
ago (39627b1ae6) and its non-replacement
corroborate that manual shm removal is now a niche goal. Back-patch to
9.4 (all supported versions).
Reviewed by Daniel Gustafsson and Kyotaro HORIGUCHI.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180812064815.GB2301738@rfd.leadboat.com
While trying to plan a partitionwise join, we may be faced with cases
where one or both input partitions for a particular segment of the join
have been pruned away. In HEAD and v11, this is problematic because
earlier processing didn't bother to make a pruned RelOptInfo fully
valid. With an upcoming patch to make partition pruning more efficient,
this'll be even more problematic because said RelOptInfo won't exist at
all.
The existing code attempts to deal with this by retroactively making the
RelOptInfo fully valid, but that causes crashes under GEQO because join
planning is done in a short-lived memory context. In v11 we could
probably have fixed this by switching to the planner's main context
while fixing up the RelOptInfo, but that idea doesn't scale well to the
upcoming patch. It would be better not to mess with the base-relation
data structures during join planning, anyway --- that's just a recipe
for order-of-operations bugs.
In many cases, though, we don't actually need the child RelOptInfo,
because if the input is certainly empty then the join segment's result
is certainly empty, so we can skip making a join plan altogether. (The
existing code ultimately arrives at the same conclusion, but only after
doing a lot more work.) This approach works except when the pruned-away
partition is on the nullable side of a LEFT, ANTI, or FULL join, and the
other side isn't pruned. But in those cases the existing code leaves a
lot to be desired anyway --- the correct output is just the result of
the unpruned side of the join, but we were emitting a useless outer join
against a dummy Result. Pending somebody writing code to handle that
more nicely, let's just abandon the partitionwise-join optimization in
such cases.
When the modified code skips making a join plan, it doesn't make a
join RelOptInfo either; this requires some upper-level code to
cope with nulls in part_rels[] arrays. We would have had to have
that anyway after the upcoming patch.
Back-patch to v11 since the crash is demonstrable there.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8305.1553884377@sss.pgh.pa.us
The transaction ID returned by GetNextXidAndEpoch() is in the future,
so we can't attempt to access its status or we might try to read a
CLOG page that doesn't exist. The > vs >= confusion probably stemmed
from the choice of a variable name containing the word "last" instead
of "next", so fix that too.
Back-patch to 10 where the function arrived.
Author: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2Buua_BV5cyfsioKVN2d61Lukg28ECsWTXKvh%3DBtN2DPA%40mail.gmail.com
Relations dropped in a single transaction are tracked in a list of
unowned relations. With large number of dropped relations this resulted
in poor performance at the end of a transaction, when the relations are
removed from the singly linked list one by one.
Commit b4166911 attempted to address this issue (particularly when it
happens during recovery) by removing the relations in a reverse order,
resulting in O(1) lookups in the list of unowned relations. This did
not work reliably, though, and it was possible to trigger the O(N^2)
behavior in various ways.
Instead of trying to remove the relations in a specific order with
respect to the linked list, which seems rather fragile, switch to a
regular doubly linked. That allows us to remove relations cheaply no
matter where in the list they are.
As b4166911 was a bugfix, backpatched to all supported versions, do the
same thing here.
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/80c27103-99e4-1d0c-642c-d9f3b94aaa0a%402ndquadrant.com
Backpatch-through: 9.4
ALTER INDEX .. ATTACH PARTITION fails if the partitioned table where the
index is defined contains more dropped columns than its partition, with
this message:
ERROR: incorrect attribute map
The cause was that one caller of CompareIndexInfo was passing the number
of attributes of the partition rather than the parent, which confused
the length check. Repair.
This can cause pg_upgrade to fail when used on such a database. Leave
some more objects around after regression tests, so that the case is
detected by pg_upgrade test suite.
Remove some spurious empty lines noticed while looking for other cases
of the same problem.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190326213924.GA2322@alvherre.pgsql
The code would do "PQclear(res)" twice if lo_unlink failed, evidently
due to careless thinking about how far out a "break" would break.
Remove the extra PQclear and adjust the loop logic so that we'll fall
out of both levels of loop after an error, as was clearly the intent.
Spotted by Coverity. I have no idea why it took this long to notice,
since the bug has been there since commit 67ccbb080. Accordingly,
back-patch to all supported branches.
52ac6cd2d0 added new field to ginxlogDeletePage and was backpatched to 9.4.
That led to problems when patched postgres instance applies WAL records
generated by non-patched one. WAL records generated by non-patched instance
don't contain new field, which patched one is expecting to see.
Thankfully, we can distinguish patched and non-patched WAL records by their data
size. If we see that WAL record is generated by non-patched instance, we skip
processing of new field. This commit comes with some assertions. In
particular, if it appears that on some platform struct data size didn't change
then static assertion will trigger.
Reported-by: Simon Riggs
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8%2Bj%2BK4whxf7ET7%2BgO%2BG-baC3-WxqqH%3DnV4X2CgfEPA3Yu3g%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs, Alvaro Herrera
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Since its introduction in 19dc233c, current_logfiles has been assigned
the same permissions as a log file, which can be enforced with
log_file_mode. This setup can lead to incompatibility problems with
group access permissions as current_logfiles is not located in the log
directory, but at the root of the data folder. Hence, if group
permissions are used but log_file_mode is more restrictive, a backup
with a user in the group having read access could fail even if the log
directory is located outside of the data folder.
Per discussion with the folks mentioned below, we have concluded that
current_logfiles should not be treated as a log file as it only stores
metadata related to log files, and that it should use the same
permissions as all other files in the data directory. This solution has
the merit to be simple and fixes all the interaction problems between
group access and log_file_mode.
Author: Haribabu Kommi
Reviewed-by: Stephen Frost, Robert Haas, Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJrrPGcEotF1P7AWoeQyD3Pqr-0xkQg_Herv98DjbaMj+naozw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where group access has been added.
Previously we were using the SQL:2003 definition, which doesn't allow
this, but that creates a serious dump/restore gotcha: there is no
setting of xmloption that will allow all valid XML data. Hence,
switch to the 2006 definition.
Since libxml doesn't accept <!DOCTYPE> directives in the mode we
use for CONTENT parsing, the implementation is to detect <!DOCTYPE>
in the input and switch to DOCUMENT parsing mode. This should not
cost much, because <!DOCTYPE> should be close to the front of the
input if it's there at all. It's possible that this causes the
error messages for malformed input to be slightly different than
they were before, if said input includes <!DOCTYPE>; but that does
not seem like a big problem.
In passing, buy back a few cycles in parsing of large XML documents
by not doing strlen() of the whole input in parse_xml_decl().
Back-patch because dump/restore failures are not nice. This change
shouldn't break any cases that worked before, so it seems safe to
back-patch.
Chapman Flack (revised a bit by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN-V+g-6JqUQEQZ55Q3toXEN6d5Ez5uvzL4VR+8KtvJKj31taw@mail.gmail.com
Buildfarm member eelpout sometimes reports the wrong error message for
an SSL connection failure. In HEAD, this problem is believed to be
solved by commit 1f39a1c06, but I'm as yet unwilling to back-patch that.
The problem seems fairly unlikely to be an issue in the field, since (as
far as we can tell) it happens only during a failure of a local-loopback
SSL connection, and it's improbable even then. It seems better to just
live with it for the time being; but let's tweak the regression test to
accept the other error message as a "pass".
Needed in v11 only, since older branches didn't check the message
text anyway.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2n6Nv+5tFfe8YnkUm1fXgvxR0Mm1FoD+QKG-vLNGLyKg@mail.gmail.com
Commit 6f6a6d8b1 introduced a delay of up to 2 seconds if we're trying
to request a checkpoint but the checkpointer hasn't started yet (or,
much less likely, our kill() call fails). However buildfarm experience
shows that that's not quite enough for slow or heavily-loaded machines.
There's no good reason to assume that the checkpointer won't start
eventually, so we may as well make the timeout much longer, say 60 sec.
However, if the caller didn't say CHECKPOINT_WAIT, it seems like a bad
idea to be waiting at all, much less for as long as 60 sec. We can
remove the need for that, and make this whole thing more robust, by
adjusting the code so that the existence of a pending checkpoint
request is clear from the contents of shared memory, and making sure
that the checkpointer process will notice it at startup even if it did
not get a signal. In this way there's no need for a non-CHECKPOINT_WAIT
call to wait at all; if it can't send the signal, it can nonetheless
assume that the checkpointer will eventually service the request.
A potential downside of this change is that "kill -INT" on the checkpointer
process is no longer enough to trigger a checkpoint, should anyone be
relying on something so hacky. But there's no obvious reason to do it
like that rather than issuing a plain old CHECKPOINT command, so we'll
assume that nobody is. There doesn't seem to be a way to preserve this
undocumented quasi-feature without introducing race conditions.
Since a principal reason for messing with this is to prevent intermittent
buildfarm failures, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27830.1552752475@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit f2dec34e1 changed things so that printtup's output stringinfo
buffer was allocated outside the per-row temporary context, not inside
it. This creates a need to free that buffer explicitly when the temp
context is freed, but that was overlooked. In most cases, this is all
happening inside a portal or executor context that will go away shortly
anyhow, but that's not always true. Notably, the stringinfo ends up
getting leaked when JDBC uses row-at-a-time fetches. For a query
that returns wide rows, that adds up after awhile.
Per bug #15700 from Matthias Otterbach. Back-patch to v11 where the
faulty code was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15700-8c408321a87d56bb@postgresql.org
We should try to prewarm each database only once. Otherwise, if
prewarming fails for some reason, it will just keep retrying in an
infnite loop. This can happen if, for example, the database has been
dropped. The existing code was intended to implement the try-once
behavior, but failed to do so because it neglected to set
worker.bgw_restart_time to BGW_NEVER_RESTART.
Mithun Cy, per a report from Hans Buschmann
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGKpQJCWcgyy3QTC9vdn6uKAR_8r__A-MMm2GYfj45caag@mail.gmail.com
This fixes an issue introduced by 266b6ac, which has added filters to
exclude file patterns on the target and source data directories to
reduce the number of files transferred. Filters get applied to both
the target and source data files, and include pg_internal.init which is
present for each database once relations are created on it. However, if
the target differed from the source with at least one new database with
relations, the rewind would fail due to the exclusion filters applied on
the target files, causing pg_internal.init to still be present on the
target database folder, while its contents should have been completely
removed so as there is nothing remaining inside at the time of the
folder deletion.
Applying exclusion filters on the source files is fine, because this way
the amount of data copied from the source to the target is reduced. And
actually, not applying the filters on the target is what pg_rewind
should do, because this causes such files to be automatically removed
during the rewind on the target. Exclusion filters apply to paths which
are removed or recreated automatically at startup, so removing all those
files on the target during the rewind is a win.
The existing set of TAP tests already stresses the rewind of databases,
but it did not include any tables on those newly-created databases.
Creating extra tables in this case is enough to reproduce the failure,
so the existing tests are extended to close the gap.
Reported-by: Mithun Cy
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADq3xVYt6_pO7ZzmjOqPgY9HWsL=kLd-_tNyMtdfjKqEALDyTA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
