Notably, this permits linking to the 32-bit Perl binaries advertised on
perl.org, namely Strawberry Perl and ActivePerl. This has a side effect
of permitting linking to binaries built with obsolete MSVC versions.
By default, MSVC 2012 and later require a "safe exception handler table"
in each binary. MinGW-built, 32-bit DLLs lack the relevant exception
handler metadata, so linking to them failed with error LNK2026. Restore
the semantics of MSVC 2010, which omits the table from a given binary if
some linker input lacks metadata. This has no effect on 64-bit builds
or on MSVC 2010 and earlier. Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported
versions).
Reported by Victor Wagner.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20160326154321.7754ab8f@wagner.wagner.home
Commits 5a5c2feca3 and
b5178c5d08 introduced support for modern
MSVC-built, 32-bit Perl, but they broke use of MinGW-built, 32-bit Perl
distributions like Strawberry Perl and modern ActivePerl. Perl has no
robust means to report whether it expects a -D_USE_32BIT_TIME_T ABI, so
test this. Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions).
The chief alternative was a heuristic of adding -D_USE_32BIT_TIME_T when
$Config{gccversion} is nonempty. That banks on every gcc-built Perl
using the same ABI. gcc could change its default ABI the way MSVC once
did, and one could build Perl with gcc and the non-default ABI.
The GNU make build system could benefit from a similar test, without
which it does not support MSVC-built Perl. For now, just add a comment.
Most users taking the special step of building Perl with MSVC probably
build PostgreSQL with MSVC.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171130041441.GA3161526@rfd.leadboat.com
Those cases currently crash and supporting them is more work then
originally thought, so we'll just prohibit these scenarios for now.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reported-by: Мансур Галиев <gomer94@yandex.ru>
Bug: #14866
plpgsql's function exec_move_row() handles assignment of a composite
source value to either a PLpgSQL_rec or PLpgSQL_row target variable.
Oddly, rather than taking a single target argument which it could do
run-time type detection on, it was coded to take two separate arguments
(only one of which is allowed to be non-NULL). This choice had then
back-propagated into storing two separate target variables in various
plpgsql statement nodes, with lots of duplicative coding and awkward
interface logic to support that. Simplify matters by folding those
pairs down to single variables, distinguishing the two cases only
where we must ... which turns out to be only in exec_move_row itself.
This is purely refactoring and should not change any behavior.
In passing, remove unused field PLpgSQL_stmt_open.returntype.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11787.1512713374@sss.pgh.pa.us
A COPY into a table should apply identity sequence values just like it
does for ordinary defaults. This was previously forgotten, leading to
null values being inserted, which in turn would fail because identity
columns have not-null constraints.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Steven Winfield <steven.winfield@cantabcapital.com>
Bug: #14952
When a worker is flagged as BGW_NEVER_RESTART and we fail to start it,
or if it is not marked BGW_NEVER_RESTART but is terminated before
startup succeeds, what BgwHandleStatus should be reported? The
previous code really hadn't considered this possibility (as indicated
by the comments which ignore it completely) and would typically return
BGWH_NOT_YET_STARTED, but that's not a good answer, because then
there's no way for code using GetBackgroundWorkerPid() to tell the
difference between a worker that has not started but will start
later and a worker that has not started and will never be started.
So, when this case happens, return BGWH_STOPPED instead. Update the
comments to reflect this.
The preceding fix by itself is insufficient to fix the problem,
because the old code also didn't send a notification to the process
identified in bgw_notify_pid when startup failed. That might've
been technically correct under the theory that the status of the
worker was BGWH_NOT_YET_STARTED, because the status would indeed not
change when the worker failed to start, but now that we're more
usefully reporting BGWH_STOPPED, a notification is needed.
Without these fixes, code which starts background workers and then
uses the recommended APIs to wait for those background workers to
start would hang indefinitely if the postmaster failed to fork a
worker.
Amit Kapila and Robert Haas
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1KDfKkvrjxsKJi3WPyceVi3dH1VCkbTJji2fuwKuB=3uw@mail.gmail.com
I suppose it is a copy-and-paste error that this test doesn't actually
test the "Parallel Append with both partial and non-partial subplans"
case (EXPLAIN alone surely doesn't qualify as a test of executor
behavior). Fix that.
Also, add cosmetic aliases to make it possible to tell apart these
otherwise-identical test cases in log_statement output.
Remove the designation that Flex is a GNU package. Even though Bison is
a GNU package, leave out the designation to not make the sentence
unnecessarily complicated.
Author: Pavan Maddamsetti <pavan.maddamsetti@gmail.com>
When we create an Append node, we can spread out the workers over the
subplans instead of piling on to each subplan one at a time, which
should typically be a bit more efficient, both because the startup
cost of any plan executed entirely by one worker is paid only once and
also because of reduced contention. We can also construct Append
plans using a mix of partial and non-partial subplans, which may allow
for parallelism in places that otherwise couldn't support it.
Unfortunately, this patch doesn't handle the important case of
parallelizing UNION ALL by running each branch in a separate worker;
the executor infrastructure is added here, but more planner work is
needed.
Amit Khandekar, Robert Haas, Amul Sul, reviewed and tested by
Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Langote, Rafia Sabih, Amit Kapila, and
Rajkumar Raghuwanshi.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9dy0K_E8r727heqXoBmWZ83HwLFwdcaSSmBQ1+S+vRuUQ@mail.gmail.com
When a Gather or Gather Merge node is started and stopped multiple
times, the old code wouldn't reset the shared state between executions,
potentially resulting in dramatically inflated instrumentation data
for nodes beneath it. (The per-worker instrumentation ended up OK,
I think, but the overall totals were inflated.)
Report by hubert depesz lubaczewski. Analysis and fix by Amit Kapila,
reviewed and tweaked a bit by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20171127175631.GA405@depesz.com
If a hash join appears in a parallel query, there may be no hash table
available for explain.c to inspect even though a hash table may have
been built in other processes. This could happen either because
parallel_leader_participation was set to off or because the leader
happened to hit the end of the outer relation immediately (even though
the complete relation is not empty) and decided not to build the hash
table.
Commit bf11e7ee introduced a way for workers to exchange
instrumentation via the DSM segment for Sort nodes even though they
are not parallel-aware. This commit does the same for Hash nodes, so
that explain.c has a way to find instrumentation data from an
arbitrary participant that actually built the hash table.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D3DUQC2-z252N55eOcZBer6DPdM%3DFzrxH9dZc5vYLsjaA%40mail.gmail.com
This is a backward incompatibility which should be noted in the
release notes for PostgreSQL 11.
For security reasons, we require that a postgres_fdw foreign table use
password authentication when accessing a remote server, so that an
unprivileged user cannot usurp the server's credentials. Superusers
are exempt from this requirement, because we assume they are entitled
to usurp the server's credentials or, at least, can find some other
way to do it.
But what should happen when the foreign table is accessed by a view
owned by a user different from the session user? Is it the view owner
that must be a superuser in order to avoid the requirement of using a
password, or the session user? Historically it was the latter, but
this requirement makes it the former instead. This allows superusers
to delegate to other users the right to select from a foreign table
that doesn't use password authentication by creating a view over the
foreign table and handing out rights to the view. It is also more
consistent with the idea that access to a view should use the view
owner's privileges rather than the session user's privileges.
The upshot of this change is that a superuser selecting from a view
created by a non-superuser may now get an error complaining that no
password was used, while a non-superuser selecting from a view
created by a superuser will no longer receive such an error.
No documentation changes are present in this patch because the
wording of the documentation already suggests that it works this
way. We should perhaps adjust the documentation in the back-branches,
but that's a task for another patch.
Originally proposed by Jeff Janes, but with different semantics;
adjusted to work like this by me per discussion.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaY4HsVZJv5SqEjCKLDwtCTSwXzKpRftgj50wmMMBwciA@mail.gmail.com
Previously, this code just reported such problems at LOG level and kept
going. The problem with this approach is that transient failures (e.g.,
ENFILE) could prevent us from resetting unlogged relations to empty,
yet allow recovery to appear to complete successfully. That seems like
a data corruption hazard large enough to treat such problems as reasons
to fail startup.
For the same reason, treat unlink failures for unlogged files as hard
errors not just LOG messages. It's a little odd that we did it like that
when file-level errors in other steps (copy_file, fsync_fname) are ERRORs.
The sole case that I left alone is that ENOENT failure on a tablespace
(not database) directory is not an error, though it will now be logged
rather than just silently ignored. This is to cover the scenario where
a previous DROP TABLESPACE removed the tablespace directory but failed
before removing the pg_tblspc symlink. I'm not sure that that's very
likely in practice, but that seems like the only real excuse for the
old behavior here, so let's allow for it. (As coded, this will also
allow ENOENT on $PGDATA/base/. But since we'll fail soon enough if
that's gone, I don't think we need to complicate this code by
distinguishing that from a true tablespace case.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21040.1512418508@sss.pgh.pa.us
do_pg_start_backup() expects its callers to pass in an open DIR pointer
for the pg_tblspc directory, but there's no apparent advantage in that.
It complicates the callers without adding any flexibility, and there's no
robustness advantage, since we surely have to be prepared for errors during
the scan of pg_tblspc anyway. In fact, by holding an extra kernel resource
during operations like the preliminary checkpoint, we might be making
things a fraction more failure-prone not less. Hence, remove that argument
and open the directory just for the duration of the actual scan.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28752.1512413887@sss.pgh.pa.us
Modify this function and its subsidiaries so that syscall failures are
reported via ereport(LOG), rather than silently ignored as before.
We don't want to throw a hard ERROR, as that would prevent database
startup, and getting rid of leftover temporary files is not important
enough for that. On the other hand, not reporting trouble at all
seems like an odd choice not in line with current project norms,
especially since any failure here is quite unexpected.
On the same reasoning, adjust these functions' AllocateDir/ReadDir calls
so that failure to scan a directory results in LOG not ERROR. I also
removed the previous practice of silently ignoring ENOENT failures during
directory opens --- there are some corner cases where that could happen
given a previous database crash, but that seems like a bad excuse for
ignoring a condition that isn't expected in most cases. A LOG message
during postmaster start seems OK in such situations, and better than
no output at all.
In passing, make RemovePgTempRelationFiles' test for "is the file name
all digits" look more like the way it's done elsewhere.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19907.1512402254@sss.pgh.pa.us
This patch fixes a couple of low-probability bugs that could lead to
reporting an irrelevant errno value (and hence possibly a wrong SQLSTATE)
concerning directory-open or file-open failures. It also fixes places
where we took shortcuts in reporting such errors, either by using elog
instead of ereport or by using ereport but forgetting to specify an
errcode. And it eliminates a lot of just plain redundant error-handling
code.
In service of all this, export fd.c's formerly-static function
ReadDirExtended, so that external callers can make use of the coding
pattern
dir = AllocateDir(path);
while ((de = ReadDirExtended(dir, path, LOG)) != NULL)
if they'd like to treat directory-open failures as mere LOG conditions
rather than errors. Also fix FreeDir to be a no-op if we reach it
with dir == NULL, as such a coding pattern would cause.
Then, remove code at many call sites that was throwing an error or log
message for AllocateDir failure, as ReadDir or ReadDirExtended can handle
that job just fine. Aside from being a net code savings, this gets rid of
a lot of not-quite-up-to-snuff reports, as mentioned above. (In some
places these changes result in replacing a custom error message such as
"could not open tablespace directory" with more generic wording "could not
open directory", but it was agreed that the custom wording buys little as
long as we report the directory name.) In some other call sites where we
can't just remove code, change the error reports to be fully
project-style-compliant.
Also reorder code in restoreTwoPhaseData that was acquiring a lock
between AllocateDir and ReadDir; in the unlikely but surely not
impossible case that LWLockAcquire changes errno, AllocateDir failures
would be misreported. There is no great value in opening the directory
before acquiring TwoPhaseStateLock, so just do it in the other order.
Also fix CheckXLogRemoved to guarantee that it preserves errno,
as quite a number of call sites are implicitly assuming. (Again,
it's unlikely but I think not impossible that errno could change
during a SpinLockAcquire. If so, this function was broken for its
own purposes as well as breaking callers.)
And change a few places that were using not-per-project-style messages,
such as "could not read directory" when "could not open directory" is
more correct.
Back-patch the exporting of ReadDirExtended, in case we have occasion
to back-patch some fix that makes use of it; it's not needed right now
but surely making it global is pretty harmless. Also back-patch the
restoreTwoPhaseData and CheckXLogRemoved fixes. The rest of this is
essentially cosmetic and need not get back-patched.
Michael Paquier, with a bit of additional work by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqRpOCxjiirHmebEFhXVTK7V5Jvw4bz82p7Oimtsm3TyZA@mail.gmail.com
Hopefully, the additional logging will help avoid confusion that
could otherwise result.
Nathan Bossart, reviewed by Michael Paquier, Fabrízio Mello, and me
There's no good reason that the multicolumn stats stuff shouldn't work on
booleans. But it looked only for "Var = pseudoconstant" clauses, and it
will seldom find those for boolean Vars, since earlier phases of planning
will fold "boolvar = true" or "boolvar = false" to just "boolvar" or
"NOT boolvar" respectively. Improve dependencies_clauselist_selectivity()
to recognize such clauses as equivalent to equality restrictions.
This fixes a failure of the extended stats mechanism to apply in a case
reported by Vitaliy Garnashevich. It's not a complete solution to his
problem because the bitmap-scan costing code isn't consulting extended
stats where it should, but that's surely an independent issue.
In passing, improve some comments, get rid of a NumRelids() test that's
redundant with the preceding bms_membership() test, and fix
dependencies_clauselist_selectivity() so that estimatedclauses actually
is a pure output argument as stated by its API contract.
Back-patch to v10 where this code was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/73a4936d-2814-dc08-ed0c-978f76f435b0@gmail.com
Before commit 6b65a7fe62, tqueue.c could
perform tuple remapping and thus leak memory, which is why commit
af33039317 made TupleQueueReaderNext
run in a short-lived context. Now, however, tqueue.c has been reduced
to a shadow of its former self, and there shouldn't be any chance of
leaks any more. Accordingly, remove some tuple copying and memory
context manipulation to speed up processing.
Patch by me, reviewed by Amit Kapila. Some testing by Rafia Sabih.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LSDydwrNjmYSNkfJ3ZivGSWH9SVswh6QpNzsMdj_oOQA@mail.gmail.com
I'm a little bit astonished that anyone's compiler would have failed to
complain about this. The compiler surely does not know that is_procedure
means the function return value will be ignored.
Antonin Houska reported that the planner does consider pushing
postgres_fdw_abs() to the remote side, which happens because we make
it shippable earlier in the test case file.
Jeevan Chalke provided this patch, which changes the join
condition to use random(), which is not shippable, instead.
Antonin reviewed the patch.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/15265.1511985971@localhost
Without this, when partdesc->nparts == 0, we end up calling
ExecBuildSlotPartitionKeyDescription without initializing values
and isnull.
Reported by Coverity via Michael Paquier. Patch by Michael Paquier,
reviewed and revised by Amit Langote.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqQ3mwkdMoPY-ocgTpPnjd8TKOadMxdTtMLvEzF8480Zfg@mail.gmail.com
We need to check whether the channel-binding flag encoded in the
client-final-message is the same one sent in the client-first-message.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
The progress messages print out \r to keep overwriting the same line on
the screen. But this does not yield useful results when writing the
output to a file. So in that case, print out \n instead.
Author: Martín Marqués <martin@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>
This adds a new object type "procedure" that is similar to a function
but does not have a return type and is invoked by the new CALL statement
instead of SELECT or similar. This implementation is aligned with the
SQL standard and compatible with or similar to other SQL implementations.
This commit adds new commands CALL, CREATE/ALTER/DROP PROCEDURE, as well
as ALTER/DROP ROUTINE that can refer to either a function or a
procedure (or an aggregate function, as an extension to SQL). There is
also support for procedures in various utility commands such as COMMENT
and GRANT, as well as support in pg_dump and psql. Support for defining
procedures is available in all the languages supplied by the core
distribution.
While this commit is mainly syntax sugar around existing functionality,
future features will rely on having procedures as a separate object
type.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Put the unique path in the same context as the owning RelOptInfo, rather
than the toplevel planner context. This is how this function worked
originally, but commit f41803bb39
changed it without explanation. mark_dummy_rel adopted the older (or
newer?) technique in commit eca75a12a2,
which also featured a much better explanation of why it is correct.
So, switch back to that technique here, with the same explanation
given there.
Although this fixes a possible memory leak when GEQO is in use, the
leak is minor and probably nobody cares, so no back-patch.
Ashutosh Bapat, reviewed by Tom Lane and by me
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRcXkHHrXyD9BCvkgGJV4TnHG2SWJ0PhJfrDu3NAcQvh7g@mail.gmail.com
Invoking the Makefile without an explicit target was building every
possible target instead of just the "all" target. Back-patch to 9.3
(all supported versions).
Previously, this function estimated the selectivity as 1 minus eqjoinsel()
for the negator equality operator, regardless of join type (I think there
was an expectation that eqjoinsel would handle the join type). But
actually this is completely wrong for semijoin cases: the fraction of the
LHS that has a non-matching row is not one minus the fraction of the LHS
that has a matching row. In reality a semijoin with <> will nearly always
succeed: it can only fail when the RHS is empty, or it contains a single
distinct value that is equal to the particular LHS value, or the LHS value
is null. The only one of those things we should have much confidence in
estimating is the fraction of LHS values that are null, so let's just take
the selectivity as 1 minus outer nullfrac.
Per coding convention, antijoin should be estimated the same as semijoin.
Arguably this is a bug fix, but in view of the lack of field complaints
and the risk of destabilizing plans, no back-patch.
Thomas Munro, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=270ze2hVxWkJw-5eKzc3AB4C9KpH3L2kih75R5pdSogg@mail.gmail.com
Provide support for dynamic or static parties of processes to wait for
all processes to reach point in the code before continuing.
This is similar to the mechanism of the same name in POSIX threads and
MPI, though has explicit phasing and dynamic party support like the
Java core library's Phaser.
This will be used by an upcoming patch adding support for parallel
hash joins.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2_y7oi01OjA_wLvYcWMc9_d=LaoxrY3eiROCZkB_qakA@mail.gmail.com
Although hash joins are already tested by many queries, these tests
systematically cover the four different states we can reach as part of
the strategy for respecting work_mem.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
This will be used by pending patches to improve partition pruning.
Amit Langote and Kyotaro Horiguchi, per a suggestion from David
Rowley. Review and testing of the larger patch set of which this is a
part by Ashutosh Bapat, David Rowley, Dilip Kumar, Jesper Pedersen,
Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Beena Emerson, Amul Sul, and Kyotaro Horiguchi.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/098b9c71-1915-1a2a-8d52-1a7a50ce79e8@lab.ntt.co.jp
Currently, partition pruning happens via constraint exclusion, but
there are pending places to replace that with a different and
hopefully faster mechanism. To be sure that we don't change behavior
without realizing it, add extensive test coverage.
Note that not all of these behaviors are optimal; in some cases,
partitions are not pruned even though it would be safe to do so.
These tests therefore serve to memorialize the current state rather
than the ideal state. Patches that improve things can update the test
results as appropriate.
Amit Langote, adjusted by me. Review and testing of the larger patch
set of which this is a part by Ashutosh Bapat, David Rowley, Dilip
Kumar, Jesper Pedersen, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Beena Emerson, Amul Sul,
and Kyotaro Horiguchi.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/098b9c71-1915-1a2a-8d52-1a7a50ce79e8@lab.ntt.co.jp
Apparently, scan-build thinks that proc->is_setof can change during
PLy_exec_function(). To make it clearer, save the value in a local
variable.
Also add an assertion to clear another warning.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com>
Decorate PLy_elog() in a similar way as elog(), to give compilers and
static analyzers hints in which cases it does not return.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com>
Noah Misch
Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane
Robert Haas
Andres Freund