rewriteRuleAction() neglected this step, although it was careful to
propagate other similar flags such as hasSubLinks or hasRowSecurity.
Omitting to transfer hasRecursive is just cosmetic at the moment,
but omitting hasModifyingCTE is a live bug, since the executor
certainly looks at that.
The proposed test case only fails back to v10, but since the executor
examines hasModifyingCTE in 9.x as well, I suspect that a test case
could be devised that fails in older branches. Given the nearness
of the release deadline, though, I'm not going to spend time looking
for a better test.
Report and patch by Greg Nancarrow, cosmetic changes by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-fAdj=nDKMsRhQzndm-O13NY4dL6xGcEvdX5Xvbbi0V7g@mail.gmail.com
Generally, members of inheritance trees must be plain tables (or,
in more recent versions, foreign tables). ALTER TABLE INHERIT
rejects creating an inheritance relationship that has a view at
either end. When DefineQueryRewrite attempts to convert a relation
to a view, it already had checks prohibiting doing so for partitioning
parents or children as well as traditional-inheritance parents ...
but it neglected to check that a traditional-inheritance child wasn't
being converted. Since the planner assumes that any inheritance
child is a table, this led to making plans that tried to do a physical
scan on a view, causing failures (or even crashes, in recent versions).
One could imagine trying to support such a case by expanding the view
normally, but since the rewriter runs before the planner does
inheritance expansion, it would take some very fundamental refactoring
to make that possible. There are probably a lot of other parts of the
system that don't cope well with such a situation, too. For now,
just forbid it.
Per bug #16856 from Yang Lin. Back-patch to all supported branches.
(In versions before v10, this includes back-patching the portion of
commit 501ed02cf that added has_superclass(). Perhaps the lack of
that infrastructure partially explains the missing check.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16856-0363e05c6e1612fd@postgresql.org
The parallel slots infrastructure (which implements client-side
multiplexing of server connections doing similar things, not
threading or multiple processes or anything like that) are moved from
src/bin/scripts/scripts_parallel.c to src/fe_utils/parallel_slot.c.
The functions consumeQueryResult() and processQueryResult() which were
previously part of src/bin/scripts/common.c are now moved into that
file as well, becoming static helper functions. This might need to be
changed in the future, but currently they're not used for anything
else.
Some other functions from src/bin/scripts/common.c are moved to to
src/fe_utils and are split up among several files. connectDatabase(),
connectMaintenanceDatabase(), and disconnectDatabase() are moved to
connect_utils.c. executeQuery(), executeCommand(), and
executeMaintenanceCommand() are move to query_utils.c.
handle_help_version_opts() is moved to option_utils.c.
Mark Dilger, reviewed by me. The larger patch series of which this is
a part has also had review from Peter Geoghegan, Andres Freund, Álvaro
Herrera, Michael Paquier, and Amul Sul, but I don't know whether any
of them have reviewed this bit specifically.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/12ED3DA8-25F0-4B68-937D-D907CFBF08E7@enterprisedb.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5F743835-3399-419C-8324-2D424237E999@enterprisedb.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/70655DF3-33CE-4527-9A4D-DDEB582B6BA0@enterprisedb.com
If a multi-byte character is escaped with a backslash in TEXT mode input,
and the encoding is one of the client-only encodings where the bytes after
the first one can have an ASCII byte "embedded" in the char, we didn't
skip the character correctly. After a backslash, we only skipped the first
byte of the next character, so if it was a multi-byte character, we would
try to process its second byte as if it was a separate character. If it
was one of the characters with special meaning, like '\n', '\r', or
another '\\', that would cause trouble.
One such exmple is the byte sequence '\x5ca45c2e666f6f' in Big5 encoding.
That's supposed to be [backslash][two-byte character][.][f][o][o], but
because the second byte of the two-byte character is 0x5c, we incorrectly
treat it as another backslash. And because the next character is a dot, we
parse it as end-of-copy marker, and throw an "end-of-copy marker corrupt"
error.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/a897f84f-8dca-8798-3139-07da5bb38728%40iki.fi
Commit 230230223 taught nodeAgg.c that, when spilling tuples from
memory in an oversized hash aggregation, it only needed to spill
input columns referenced in the node's tlist and quals. Unfortunately,
that's wrong: we also have to save the grouping columns. The error
is masked in common cases because the grouping columns also appear
in the tlist, but that's not necessarily true. The main category
of plans where it's not true seem to come from semijoins ("WHERE
outercol IN (SELECT innercol FROM innertable)") where the innercol
needs an implicit promotion to make it comparable to the outercol.
The grouping column will be "innercol::promotedtype", but that
expression appears nowhere in the Agg node's own tlist and quals;
only the bare "innercol" is found in the tlist.
I spent quite a bit of time looking for a suitable regression test
case for this, without much success. If the number of distinct
values of the innercol is large enough to make spilling happen,
the planner tends to prefer a non-HashAgg plan, at least for
problem sizes that are reasonable to use in the regression tests.
So, no new regression test. However, this patch does demonstrably
fix the originally-reported test case.
Per report from s.p.e (at) gmx-topmail.de. Backpatch to v13
where the troublesome code came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/trinity-1c565d44-159f-488b-a518-caf13883134f-1611835701633@3c-app-gmx-bap78
switchToPresortedPrefixMode() did the wrong thing if it detected
a batch boundary just at the last tuple of a fullsort group.
The initially-reported symptom was a "retrieved too many tuples in a
bounded sort" error, but the test case added here just silently gives
the wrong answer without this patch.
I (tgl) am not really happy about committing this patch without review
from the incremental-sort authors, but they seem AWOL and we are hard
against a release deadline. This does demonstrably make some cases
better, anyway.
Per bug #16846 from Yoran Heling. Back-patch to v13 where incremental
sort was introduced.
Neil Chen
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16846-ae49f51ac379a4cb@postgresql.org
Add some additional defensive checks in the second phase of index
deletion to detect and report index corruption during VACUUM, and to
avoid having VACUUM become stuck in more cases. The code is still not
robust in the presence of a circular chain of sibling links, though it's
not clear whether that really matters. This is follow-up work to commit
3a01f68e.
The new defensive checks rely on the assumption that there can be no
more than one VACUUM operation running for an index at any given time.
Remove an old comment suggesting that multiple concurrent VACUUMs need
to be considered here. This concern now seems highly unlikely to have
any real validity, since we clearly rely on the same assumption in
several other places. For example, there are much more recent comments
that appear in the same function (added by commit efada2b8e9) that make
the same assumption.
Also add a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to the relevant code path. Contrary
to comments added by commit 3a01f68e, it is actually possible to handle
interrupts here, at least in the common case where processing takes
place at the leaf level. We only hold a pin on leafbuf/target page when
stepping right at the leaf level.
No backpatch due to the lack of complaints following hardening added to
the same area by commit 3a01f68e.
The # of bytes processed was accumulated slightly incorrectly. After
loading more data to the input buffer, we added the number of bytes in
the buffer to the sum. But in case of multi-byte characters or escapes,
there can be a few unprocessed bytes left over from previous load in the
buffer. Those bytes got counted twice.
In the error messages referring to the user right "Lock pages in
memory", this is a term from the Windows OS, so it should be
translated in accordance with the OS localization. Refactor the error
messages so this is easier and clearer. Also fix the capitalization
to match the existing capitalization in the OS.
This patch adds the possibility to move indexes to a new tablespace
while rebuilding them. Both the concurrent and the non-concurrent cases
are supported, and the following set of restrictions apply:
- When using TABLESPACE with a REINDEX command that targets a
partitioned table or index, all the indexes of the leaf partitions are
moved to the new tablespace. The tablespace references of the non-leaf,
partitioned tables in pg_class.reltablespace are not changed. This
requires an extra ALTER TABLE SET TABLESPACE.
- Any index on a toast table rebuilt as part of a parent table is kept
in its original tablespace.
- The operation is forbidden on system catalogs, including trying to
directly move a toast relation with REINDEX. This results in an error
if doing REINDEX on a single object. REINDEX SCHEMA, DATABASE and
SYSTEM skip system relations when TABLESPACE is used.
Author: Alexey Kondratov, Michael Paquier, Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8a8f5f73-00d3-55f8-7583-1375ca8f6a91@postgrespro.ru
If a portal is used to run a prepared CALL or DO statement that
contains a ROLLBACK, PortalRunMulti fails because the portal's
statement list gets cleared by the rollback. (Since the grammar
doesn't allow CALL/DO in PREPARE, the only easy way to get to this is
via extended query protocol, which treats all inputs as prepared
statements.) It's difficult to avoid resetting the portal early
because of resource-management issues, so work around this by teaching
PortalRunMulti to be wary of portal->stmts having suddenly become NIL.
The crash has only been seen to occur in v13 and HEAD (as a
consequence of commit 1cff1b95a having added an extra touch of
portal->stmts). But even before that, the code involved touching a
List that the portal no longer has any claim on. In the test case at
hand, the List will still exist because of another refcount on the
cached plan; but I'm far from convinced that it's impossible for the
cached plan to have been dropped by the time control gets back to
PortalRunMulti. Hence, backpatch to v11 where nested transactions
were added.
Thomas Munro and Tom Lane, per bug #16811 from James Inform
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16811-c1b599b2c6c2d622@postgresql.org
The logic for converting the shell-glob-like syntax supported by
utilities like psql and pg_dump to regular expression is
extracted into a new function patternToSQLRegex. The existing
function processSQLNamePattern now uses this function as a
subroutine.
patternToSQLRegex is a little more general than what is required
by processSQLNamePattern. That function is only interested in
patterns that can have up to 2 parts, a schema and a relation;
but patternToSQLRegex can limit the maximum number of parts to
between 1 and 3, so that patterns can look like either
"database.schema.relation", "schema.relation", or "relation"
depending on how it's invoked and what the user specifies.
processSQLNamePattern only passes two buffers, so works exactly
the same as before, always interpreting the pattern as either
a "schema.relation" pattern or a "relation" pattern. But,
future callers can use this function in other ways.
Mark Dilger, reviewed by me. The larger patch series of which this is
a part has also had review from Peter Geoghegan, Andres Freund, Álvaro
Herrera, Michael Paquier, and Amul Sul, but I don't know whether
any of them have reviewed this bit specifically.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/12ED3DA8-25F0-4B68-937D-D907CFBF08E7@enterprisedb.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5F743835-3399-419C-8324-2D424237E999@enterprisedb.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/70655DF3-33CE-4527-9A4D-DDEB582B6BA0@enterprisedb.com
Now that commit 62f34097c attached BKI_LOOKUP annotation to all the
namespace and role OID columns in the catalogs, there's no real reason
to have the magic PGNSP and PGUID symbols. Get rid of them in favor
of implementing those lookups according to genbki.pl's normal pattern.
This means that in the catalog headers, BKI_DEFAULT(PGNSP) becomes
BKI_DEFAULT(pg_catalog), which seems a lot more transparent.
BKI_DEFAULT(PGUID) becomes BKI_DEFAULT(POSTGRES), which is perhaps
less so; but you can look into pg_authid.dat to discover that
POSTGRES is the nonce name for the bootstrap superuser.
This change also means that if we ever need cross-references in the
initial catalog data to any of the other built-in roles besides
POSTGRES, or to some other built-in schema besides pg_catalog,
we can just do it.
No catversion bump here, as there's no actual change in the contents
of postgres.bki.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3240355.1612129197@sss.pgh.pa.us
Generation expressions of generated columns are always inherited, so
there is no need to set them separately in child tables, and there is
no syntax to do so either. The code previously used the code paths
for the handling of default values, for which different rules apply;
in particular it might want to set a default value explicitly for an
inherited column. This resulted in unrestorable dumps. For generated
columns, just skip them in inherited tables.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/15830.1575468847%40sss.pgh.pa.us
This follows in the spirit of commit dfb75e478, which created primary
key and uniqueness constraints to improve the visibility of constraints
imposed on the system catalogs. While our catalogs contain many
foreign-key-like relationships, they don't quite follow SQL semantics,
in that the convention for an omitted reference is to write zero not
NULL. Plus, we have some cases in which there are arrays each of whose
elements is supposed to be an FK reference; SQL has no way to model that.
So we can't create actual foreign key constraints to describe the
situation. Nonetheless, we can collect and use knowledge about these
relationships.
This patch therefore adds annotations to the catalog header files to
declare foreign-key relationships. (The BKI_LOOKUP annotations cover
simple cases, but we weren't previously distinguishing which such
columns are allowed to contain zeroes; we also need new markings for
multi-column FK references.) Then, Catalog.pm and genbki.pl are
taught to collect this information into a table in a new generated
header "system_fk_info.h". The only user of that at the moment is
a new SQL function pg_get_catalog_foreign_keys(), which exposes the
table to SQL. The oidjoins regression test is rewritten to use
pg_get_catalog_foreign_keys() to find out which columns to check.
Aside from removing the need for manual maintenance of that test
script, this allows it to cover numerous relationships that were not
checked by the old implementation based on findoidjoins. (As of this
commit, 217 relationships are checked by the test, versus 181 before.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3240355.1612129197@sss.pgh.pa.us
The prototype calls the second argument of
pgstat_progress_update_multi_param() "index", and some callers name
their local variable that way. But when the surrounding code deals
with index relations, this is confusing, and in at least one case
shadowed another variable that is referring to an index relation.
Adjust those call sites to have clearer local variable naming, similar
to existing callers in indexcmds.c.
It turns out that the calculation of [Merge]AppendPath.partitioned_rels
in allpaths.c is faulty and sometimes omits relevant non-leaf partitions,
allowing an assertion added by commit a929e17e5a to trigger. Rather
than fix that, it seems better to get rid of those fields altogether.
We don't really need the info until create_plan time, and calculating
it once for the selected plan should be cheaper than calculating it
for each append path we consider.
The preceding two commits did away with all use of the partitioned_rels
values; this commit just mechanically removes the fields and the code
that calculated them.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87sg8tqhsl.fsf@aurora.ydns.eu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJKUy5gCXDSmFs2c=R+VGgn7FiYcLCsEFEuDNNLGfoha=pBE_g@mail.gmail.com
It turns out that the calculation of [Merge]AppendPath.partitioned_rels
in allpaths.c is faulty and sometimes omits relevant non-leaf partitions,
allowing an assertion added by commit a929e17e5a to trigger. Rather
than fix that, it seems better to get rid of those fields altogether.
We don't really need the info until create_plan time, and calculating
it once for the selected plan should be cheaper than calculating it
for each append path we consider.
This patch undoes a couple of very minor uses of the partitioned_rels
values.
createplan.c was testing for nil-ness to optimize away the preparatory
work for make_partition_pruneinfo(). That is worth doing if the check
is nigh free, but it's not worth going to any great lengths to avoid.
create_append_path() was testing for nil-ness as part of deciding how
to set up ParamPathInfo for an AppendPath. I replaced that with a
check for the appendrel's parent rel being partitioned. That's not
quite the same thing but should cover most cases. If we note any
interesting loss of optimizations, we can dumb this down to just
always use the more expensive method when the parent is a baserel.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87sg8tqhsl.fsf@aurora.ydns.eu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJKUy5gCXDSmFs2c=R+VGgn7FiYcLCsEFEuDNNLGfoha=pBE_g@mail.gmail.com
It turns out that the calculation of [Merge]AppendPath.partitioned_rels
in allpaths.c is faulty and sometimes omits relevant non-leaf partitions,
allowing an assertion added by commit a929e17e5a to trigger. Rather
than fix that, it seems better to get rid of those fields altogether.
We don't really need the info until create_plan time, and calculating
it once for the selected plan should be cheaper than calculating it
for each append path we consider.
As a first step, teach make_partition_pruneinfo to collect the relevant
partitioned tables for itself. It's not hard to do so by traversing
from child tables up to parents using the AppendRelInfo links.
While here, make some minor stylistic improvements; mainly, don't use
the "Relids" alias for bitmapsets that are not identities of any
relation considered by the planner. Try to document the logic better,
too.
No backpatch, as there does not seem to be a live problem before
a929e17e5a. Also no new regression test; the code where the bug
was will be gone at the end of this patch series, so it seems a
bit pointless to memorialize the issue.
Tom Lane and David Rowley, per reports from Andreas Seltenreich
and Jaime Casanova.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87sg8tqhsl.fsf@aurora.ydns.eu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJKUy5gCXDSmFs2c=R+VGgn7FiYcLCsEFEuDNNLGfoha=pBE_g@mail.gmail.com
This adds the SQL standard feature that adds the SEARCH and CYCLE
clauses to recursive queries to be able to do produce breadth- or
depth-first search orders and detect cycles. These clauses can be
rewritten into queries using existing syntax, and that is what this
patch does in the rewriter.
Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/db80ceee-6f97-9b4a-8ee8-3ba0c58e5be2@2ndquadrant.com
This is a replacement for the existing --with-openssl, extending the
logic to make easier the addition of new SSL libraries. The grammar is
chosen to be similar to --with-uuid, where multiple values can be
chosen, with "openssl" as the only supported value for now.
The original switch, --with-openssl, is kept for compatibility.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/FAB21FC8-0F62-434F-AA78-6BD9336D630A@yesql.se
On machines where sizeof(Datum) > sizeof(Oid) (that is, any 64-bit
platform), the previous coding would compute a misaligned
workspace->index pointer if nupper is odd. Architectures where
misaligned access is a hard no-no would then fail. This appears
to explain why thorntail is unhappy but other buildfarm members
are not.
The latestRemovedXid values used by nbtree deletion operations are
determined by _bt_delitems_delete()'s caller, so there is no reason to
pass a separate heapRel argument.
Oversight in commit d168b66682.
When to_tsquery() or websearch_to_tsquery() meet a complex morph containing
multiple words residing adjacent position, these words are connected
with OP_AND operator. That leads to surprising results. For instace,
both websearch_to_tsquery('"pg_class pg"') and to_tsquery('pg_class <-> pg')
produce '( pg & class ) <-> pg' tsquery. This tsquery requires
'pg' and 'class' words to reside on the same position and doesn't match
to to_tsvector('pg_class pg'). It appears to be ridiculous behavior, which
needs to be fixed.
This commit makes to_tsquery() or websearch_to_tsquery() connect words
residing adjacent position with OP_PHRASE. Therefore, now those words are
normally chained with other OP_PHRASE operator. The examples of above now
produces 'pg <-> class <-> pg' tsquery, which matches to
to_tsvector('pg_class pg').
Another effect of this commit is that complex morph word positions now need to
match the tsvector even if there is no surrounding OP_PHRASE. This behavior
change generally looks like an improvement but making this commit not
backpatchable.
Reported-by: Barry Pederson
Bug: #16592
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16592-70b110ff9731c07d@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdv0EzVhf6CWfB1_TTZqXV_2Sn-jSY3zSd7ePH%3D-%2B1V2DQ%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Neil Chen
For those system catalogs that have a unique indexes, make a primary
key and unique constraint, using ALTER TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY/UNIQUE
USING INDEX.
This can be helpful for GUI tools that look for a primary key, and it
might in the future allow declaring foreign keys, for making schema
diagrams.
The constraint creation statements are automatically created by
genbki.pl from DECLARE_UNIQUE_INDEX directives. To specify which one
of the available unique indexes is the primary key, use the new
directive DECLARE_UNIQUE_INDEX_PKEY instead. By convention, we
usually make a catalog's OID column its primary key, if it has one.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/dc5f44d9-5ec1-a596-0251-dadadcdede98@2ndquadrant.com
The SQL standard allows a GRANTED BY clause on GRANT and
REVOKE (privilege) statements that can specify CURRENT_USER or
CURRENT_ROLE. In PostgreSQL, both of these are the default behavior.
Since we already have all the parsing support for this for the
GRANT (role) statement, we might as well add basic support for this
for the privilege variant as well. This allows us to check off SQL
feature T332. In the future, perhaps more interesting things could be
done with this, too.
Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f2feac44-b4c5-f38f-3699-2851d6a76dc9@2ndquadrant.com
Given a permanent relation rewritten in the current transaction, the
old_snapshot_threshold mechanism assumed the relation had never been
subject to early pruning. Hence, a query could fail to report "snapshot
too old" when the rewrite followed an early truncation. ALTER TABLE SET
TABLESPACE is probably the only rewrite mechanism capable of exposing
this bug. REINDEX sets indcheckxmin, avoiding the problem. CLUSTER has
zeroed page LSNs since before old_snapshot_threshold existed, so
old_snapshot_threshold has never cooperated with it. ALTER TABLE
... SET DATA TYPE makes the table look empty to every past snapshot,
which is strictly worse. Back-patch to v13, where commit
c6b92041d3 broke this.
Kyotaro Horiguchi and Noah Misch
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210113.160705.2225256954956139776.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
CREATE PUBLICATION has failed spuriously when applied to a permanent
relation created or rewritten in the current transaction. Make the same
change to another site having the same semantic intent; the second
instance has no user-visible consequences. Back-patch to v13, where
commit c6b92041d3 broke this.
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210113.160705.2225256954956139776.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
In a cluster having used CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY while having enabled
prepared transactions, queries that use the resulting index can silently
fail to find rows. Fix this for future CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY by
making it wait for prepared transactions like it waits for ordinary
transactions. This expands the VirtualTransactionId structure domain to
admit prepared transactions. It may be necessary to reindex to recover
from past occurrences. Back-patch to 9.5 (all supported versions).
Andrey Borodin, reviewed (in earlier versions) by Tom Lane and Michael
Paquier.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2E712143-97F7-4890-B470-4A35142ABC82@yandex-team.ru
4c9c359, that introduced those two functions, has been overoptimistic on
the point that only ShareUpdateExclusiveLock would be required when
moving a relation to a new tablespace. AccessExclusiveLock is a
requirement, but ShareUpdateExclusiveLock may be used under specific
conditions like REINDEX CONCURRENTLY where waits on past transactions
make the operation safe even with a lower-level lock. The current code
does only the former, so update the existing comments to reflect that.
Once a REINDEX (TABLESPACE) is introduced, those comments would require
an extra refresh to mention their new use case.
While on it, fix an incorrect variable name.
Per discussion with Álvaro Herrera.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210127140741.GA14174@alvherre.pgsql
pg_standby was useful more than a decade ago, but now it is obsolete.
It has been proposed that we retire it many times. Now seems like a
good time to finally do it, because "waiting restore commands"
are incompatible with a proposed recovery prefetching feature.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201029024412.GP5380%40telsasoft.com
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Per buildfarm and local experimentation, bleeding-edge gcc isn't
convinced that the MemSet in reorder_function_arguments() is safe.
Shut it up by adding an explicit check that pronargs isn't negative,
and by changing MemSet to memset. (It appears that either change is
enough to quiet the warning at -O2, but let's do both to be sure.)
In trying to protect the user from inconsistent behavior, commit
487e9861d0 "Enable BEFORE row-level triggers for partitioned tables"
tried to prevent BEFORE UPDATE FOR EACH ROW triggers from moving the row
from one partition to another. However, it turns out that the
restriction is wrong in two ways: first, it fails spuriously, preventing
valid situations from working, as in bug #16794; and second, they don't
protect from any misbehavior, because tuple routing would cope anyway.
Fix by removing that restriction.
We keep the same restriction on BEFORE INSERT FOR EACH ROW triggers,
though. It is valid and useful there. In the future we could remove it
by having tuple reroute work for inserts as it does for updates.
Backpatch to 13.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Phillip Menke <pg@pmenke.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16794-350a655580fbb9ae@postgresql.org
perform_pruning_combine_step() was not taught about the number of
partition indexes used in hash partitioning; more embarrassingly,
get_matching_hash_bounds() also had it wrong. These errors are masked
in the common case where all the partitions have the same modulus
and no partition is missing. However, with missing or unequal-size
partitions, we could erroneously prune some partitions that need
to be scanned, leading to silently wrong query answers.
While a minimal-footprint fix for this could be to export
get_partition_bound_num_indexes and make the incorrect functions use it,
I'm of the opinion that that function should never have existed in the
first place. It's not reasonable data structure design that
PartitionBoundInfoData lacks any explicit record of the length of
its indexes[] array. Perhaps that was all right when it could always
be assumed equal to ndatums, but something should have been done about
it as soon as that stopped being true. Putting in an explicit
"nindexes" field makes both partition_bounds_equal() and
partition_bounds_copy() simpler, safer, and faster than before,
and removes explicit knowledge of the number-of-partition-indexes
rules from some other places too.
This change also makes get_hash_partition_greatest_modulus obsolete.
I left that in place in case any external code uses it, but no core
code does anymore.
Per bug #16840 from Michał Albrycht. Back-patch to v11 where the
hash partitioning code came in. (In the back branches, add the new
field at the end of PartitionBoundInfoData to minimize ABI risks.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16840-571a22976f829ad4@postgresql.org
We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]"
in the actual function definitions. Per C99 these are equivalent,
but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about
the inconsistency. Clean it up before the warnings get any more
widespread.
Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with
bleeding-edge compilers.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us
doConnect() never returns connections in state CONNECTION_BAD, so
checking for that is pointless. Remove the code that does.
This code has been dead since ba708ea3dc, 20 years ago.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210126195224.GA20361@alvherre.pgsql
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane
Michael Paquier
Robert Haas
Heikki Linnakangas
Thomas Munro
Peter Geoghegan
Peter Eisentraut
Alexander Korotkov
Noah Misch
Alvaro Herrera