When creating a uniqueness constraint using a pre-existing index,
we have always required that the index have the same properties you'd
get if you just let a new index get built. However, when collations
were added, we forgot to add the index's collation to that check.
It's hard to trip over this without intentionally trying to break it:
you'd have to explicitly specify a different collation in CREATE
INDEX, then convert it to a pkey or unique constraint. Still, if you
did that, pg_dump would emit a script that fails to reproduce the
index's collation. The main practical problem is that after a
pg_upgrade the index would be corrupt, because its actual physical
order wouldn't match what pg_index says. A more theoretical issue,
which is new as of v12, is that if you create the index with a
nondeterministic collation then it wouldn't be enforcing the normal
notion of uniqueness, causing the constraint to mean something
different from a normally-created constraint.
To fix, just add collation to the conditions checked for index
acceptability in ADD PRIMARY KEY/UNIQUE USING INDEX. We won't try
to clean up after anybody who's already created such a situation;
it seems improbable enough to not be worth the effort involved.
(If you do get into trouble, a REINDEX should be enough to fix it.)
In principle this is a long-standing bug, but I chose not to
back-patch --- the odds of causing trouble seem about as great
as the odds of preventing it, and both risks are very low anyway.
Per report from Alexey Bashtanov, though this is not his preferred
fix.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b05ce36a-cefb-ca5e-b386-a400535b1c0b@imap.cc
This function is supported down to OpenSSL 0.9.8, which is the oldest
version supported since 593d4e4 (from Postgres 10 onwards), and is used
since e3bdb2d (from 11 onwards). It is defined as a macro from OpenSSL
0.9.8 to 1.0.2, and as a function in 1.1.0 and newer versions. However,
the configure check present is only adapted for functions. So, even if
the code would be able to compile, configure fails to detect the macro,
causing it to be ignored when compiling the code with OpenSSL from 0.9.8
to 1.0.2.
The code needs a configure check as per a364dfa, which has fixed a
compilation issue with a past version of LibreSSL in NetBSD 5.1. On
HEAD, just remove the configure check as the last release of NetBSD 5 is
from 2014 (and we have no more buildfarm members for it). In 11 and 12,
improve the configure logic so as both macros and functions are
correctly detected. This makes NetBSD 5 still work on already-released
branches, but not for 13 onwards.
The patch for HEAD is from me, and Daniel has written the version to use
for the back-branches.
Author: Michael Paquier, Daniel Gustaffson
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191205083252.GE5064@paquier.xyz
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/98F7F99E-1129-41D8-B86B-FE3B1E286881@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 11
When restoring database schemas on a new cluster, database "template1"
is processed first, followed by all other databases in parallel,
including "postgres". Both "postgres" and "template1" have some extra
handling to propagate each one's properties, but comments were confusing
regarding which one is processed where.
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_a2iviTG7FE10yO_gcW+zQCHNFhRA_NDiktf3UR65BHdw@mail.gmail.com
Add a new function ReceiveCopyData that does just that, taking a
callback as an argument to specify what should be done with each chunk
as it is received. This allows a single copy of the logic to be shared
between ReceiveTarFile and ReceiveAndUnpackTarFile, and eliminates
a few #ifdef conditions based on HAVE_LIBZ.
While this is slightly more code, it's arguably clearer, and
there is a pending patch that introduces additional calls to
ReceiveCopyData.
This commit is not intended to result in any functional change.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYZDTHbSpwZtW=JDgAhwVAYvmdSrRUjOd+AYdfNNXVBDg@mail.gmail.com
Remove a duplicated word. Add "of" or "# of" in a couple places
for clarity and consistency. Start comments with a lower case
letter as we do elsewhere in this file.
Rafia Sabih
Change default of ssl_min_protocol_version to TLSv1.2 (from TLSv1,
which means 1.0). Older versions are still supported, just not by
default.
TLS 1.0 is widely deprecated, and TLS 1.1 only slightly less so. All
OpenSSL versions that support TLS 1.1 also support TLS 1.2, so there
would be very little reason to, say, set the default to TLS 1.1
instead on grounds of better compatibility.
The test suite overrides this new setting, so it can still run with
older OpenSSL versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/b327f8df-da98-054d-0cc5-b76a857cfed9%402ndquadrant.com
This is similar to what pg_basebackup and pg_rewind do when reporting
cumulative data, and that's more user-friendly. Carriage returns are
now used when stderr points to a terminal, and newlines are used in
other cases, like a redirection to a log file.
Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Fabien Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFNwEjPeVaQsp2L7DyCPv1Eg1guwhrVhzMYqUJUk8ULKg@mail.gmail.com
This variable is now part of the refactored code for query cancellation
in fe_utils. This fixes an oversight in commit a4fd3aa. While on it,
improve some header includes in bin/scripts/.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Fabien Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191203101625.GF1634@paquier.xyz
The dict_int text search dictionary template accepts maxlen parameter,
which is then used to cap the length of input strings. The value was
not properly checked, and the code simply does
txt[d->maxlen] = '\0';
to insert a terminator, leading to segfaults with negative values.
This commit simply rejects values less than 1. The issue was there since
dct_int was introduced in 9.3, so backpatch all the way back to 9.4
which is the oldest supported version.
Reported-by: cili
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16144-a36a5bef7657047d@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.4
EXPLAIN generally only adds schema qualifications to table names when
VERBOSE is specified. In postgres_fdw's "Relations" output, table
names were always so qualified, but that was an implementation
restriction: in the original coding, we didn't have access to the
verbose flag at the time the string was generated. After the code
rearrangement of commit 4526951d5, we do have that info available
at the right time, so make this output follow the normal rule.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12424.1575168015@sss.pgh.pa.us
Error messages referring to incorrect WAL segment names could have been
generated for a fsync() failure or when creating a new segment at the
end of recovery.
XLogFileNameP() is a wrapper routine able to build a palloc'd string for
a WAL segment name, which is used for error string generation. There
were several code paths where it gets called in a critical section,
where memory allocation is not allowed. This results in triggering
an assertion failure instead of generating the wanted error message.
Another, more annoying, problem is that if the allocation to generate
the WAL segment name fails on OOM, then the failure would be escalated
to a PANIC.
This removes the routine and all its callers are replaced with a logic
using a fixed-size buffer. This way, all the existing mistakes are
fixed and future ones are prevented.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k5gC9H4uoWMLg9K_QfNrnkkdEw+-AFveob9YX7z8JnKTA@mail.gmail.com
On Windows, all the hosts spawned by the TAP tests bind to 127.0.0.1.
Hence, if there is a port conflict, starting a cluster would immediately
fail. One of the test scripts of pg_ctl initializes a node without
PostgresNode.pm, using the default port 5432. This could cause
unexpected startup failures in the tests if an independent server was up
and running on the same host (the reverse is also possible, though more
unlikely). Fix this issue by assigning properly a free port to the node
configured, in the same range used as for the other nodes part of the
tests.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191202031444.GC1696@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 11
If an inheritance/partitioning parent table is assigned some column
alias names in the query, EXPLAIN mapped those aliases onto the
child tables' columns by physical position, resulting in bogus output
if a child table's columns aren't one-for-one with the parent's.
To fix, make expand_single_inheritance_child() generate a correctly
re-mapped column alias list, rather than just copying the parent
RTE's alias node. (We have to fill the alias field, not just
adjust the eref field, because ruleutils.c will ignore eref in
favor of looking at the real column names.)
This means that child tables will now always have alias fields in
plan rtables, where before they might not have. That results in
a rather substantial set of regression test output changes:
EXPLAIN will now always show child tables with aliases that match
the parent table (usually with "_N" appended for uniqueness).
But that seems like a net positive for understandability, since
the parent alias corresponds to something that actually appeared
in the original query, while the child table names didn't.
(Note that this does not change anything for cases where an explicit
table alias was written in the query for the parent table; it
just makes cases without such aliases behave similarly to that.)
Hence, while we could avoid these subsidiary changes if we made
inherit.c more complicated, we choose not to.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12424.1575168015@sss.pgh.pa.us
This provides for cheaper mapping of child columns back to parent
columns. The one existing use-case in examine_simple_variable()
would hardly justify this by itself; but an upcoming bug fix will
make use of this array in a mainstream code path, and it seems
likely that we'll find other uses for it as we continue to build
out the partitioning infrastructure.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12424.1575168015@sss.pgh.pa.us
The relation aliases shown in the "Relations" line for a foreign scan
didn't always agree with those used in the rest of EXPLAIN's output.
The regression test result changes appearing here provide examples.
It's really impossible for postgres_fdw to duplicate EXPLAIN's alias
assignment logic during postgresGetForeignRelSize(), because of the
de-duplication that EXPLAIN does on a global basis --- and anyway,
trying to duplicate that would be unmaintainable. Instead, just put
numeric rangetable indexes into the string, and convert those to
table names/aliases in postgresExplainForeignScan, which does have
access to the results of ruleutils.c's alias assignment logic.
Aside from being more reliable, this shifts some work from planning
to EXPLAIN, which is a good tradeoff for performance. (I also
changed from using StringInfo to using psprintf, which makes the
code slightly simpler and reduces its memory consumption.)
A kluge required by this solution is that we have to reverse-engineer
the rtoffset applied by setrefs.c. If that logic ever fails
(presumably because the member tables of a join got offset by
different amounts), we'll need some more cooperation with setrefs.c
to keep things straight. But for now, there's no need for that.
Arguably this is a back-patchable bug fix, but since this is a mostly
cosmetic issue and there have been no field complaints, I'll refrain
for now.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12424.1575168015@sss.pgh.pa.us
Originally, this code was duplicated in src/bin/psql/ and
src/bin/scripts/, but it can be useful for other frontend applications,
like pgbench. This refactoring offers the possibility to setup a custom
callback which would get called in the signal handler for SIGINT or when
the interruption console events happen on Windows.
Author: Fabien Coelho, with contributions from Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Ibrar Ahmed
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1910311939430.27369@lancre
We implement ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS by truncating tables marked that
way, which requires also truncating/rebuilding their indexes. But
RelationTruncateIndexes asks the relcache for up-to-date copies of any
index expressions, which may cause execution of eval_const_expressions
on them, which can result in actual execution of subexpressions.
This is a bad thing to have happening during ON COMMIT. Manuel Rigger
reported that use of a SQL function resulted in crashes due to
expectations that ActiveSnapshot would be set, which it isn't.
The most obvious fix perhaps would be to push a snapshot during
PreCommit_on_commit_actions, but I think that would just open the door
to more problems: CommitTransaction explicitly expects that no
user-defined code can be running at this point.
Fortunately, since we know that no tuples exist to be indexed, there
seems no need to use the real index expressions or predicates during
RelationTruncateIndexes. We can set up dummy index expressions
instead (we do need something that will expose the right data type,
as there are places that build index tupdescs based on this), and
just ignore predicates and exclusion constraints.
In a green field it'd likely be better to reimplement ON COMMIT DELETE
ROWS using the same "init fork" infrastructure used for unlogged
relations. That seems impractical without catalog changes though,
and even without that it'd be too big a change to back-patch.
So for now do it like this.
Per private report from Manuel Rigger. This has been broken forever,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
This patch providies for support for password protected SSL client
keys in libpq, and for DER format keys, both encrypted and unencrypted.
There is a new connection parameter sslpassword, which is supplied to
the OpenSSL libraries via a callback function. The callback function can
also be set by an application by calling PQgetSSLKeyPassHook(). There is
also a function to retreive the connection setting, PQsslpassword().
Craig Ringer and Andrew Dunstan
Reviewed by: Greg Nancarrow
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f7ee88ed-95c4-95c1-d4bf-7b415363ab62@2ndQuadrant.com
When using %b or %B patterns to format a date, the code was simply using
tm_mon as an index into array of month names. But that is wrong, because
tm_mon is 1-based, while array indexes are 0-based. The result is we
either use name of the next month, or a segfault (for December).
Fix by subtracting 1 from tm_mon for both patterns, and add a regression
test triggering the issue. Backpatch to all supported versions (the bug
is there far longer, since at least 2003).
Reported-by: Paul Spencer
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16143-0d861eb8688d3fef%40postgresql.org
This commit revert the commits to add a test case that tests the 'force'
option when there is an active backend connected to the database being
dropped.
This feature internally sends SIGTERM to all the backends connected to the
database being dropped and then the same is reported to the client. We
found that on Windows, the client end of the socket is not able to read
the data once we close the socket in the server which leads to loss of
error message which is not what we expect. We also observed similar
behavior in other cases like pg_terminate_backend(),
pg_ctl kill TERM <pid>. There are probably a few others like that. The
fix for this requires further study.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1iaD8h-0004us-K9@gemulon.postgresql.org
Add a regression test file that exercises the kinds of commands that
allow_system_table_mods allows.
This is put in the "unsafe_tests" suite, so it won't accidentally
create a mess if someone runs the normal regression tests against an
instance that they care about.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8b00ea5e-28a7-88ba-e848-21528b632354%402ndquadrant.com
Make allow_system_table_mods settable at run time by superusers. It
was previously postmaster start only.
We don't want to make system catalog DDL wide-open, but there are
occasionally useful things to do like setting reloptions or statistics
on a busy system table, and blocking those doesn't help anyone. Also,
this enables the possibility of writing a test suite for this setting.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8b00ea5e-28a7-88ba-e848-21528b632354%402ndquadrant.com
Previously, allow_system_table_mods allowed a non-superuser to do DML
on a system table without further permission checks. This has been
removed, as it was quite inconsistent with the rest of the meaning of
this setting. (Since allow_system_table_mods was previously only
accessible with a server restart, it is unlikely that anyone was using
this possibility.)
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8b00ea5e-28a7-88ba-e848-21528b632354%402ndquadrant.com
The byte loop used in pglz_decompress() because of possible overlap may
be quite inefficient, so this commit replaces it with memcpy. The gains
do depend on the data (compressibility) and hardware, but seem to be
quite significant.
Author: Andrey Borodin
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Konstantin Knizhnik, Tels
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/469C9ED9-348C-4FE7-A7A7-B0FA671BEE4C@yandex-team.ru
When picking the best extended statistics object for a list of clauses,
it's not enough to look at attnums extracted from the clause list as a
whole. Consider for example this query with OR clauses:
SELECT * FROM t WHERE (t.a = 1) OR (t.b = 1) OR (t.c = 1)
with a statistics defined on columns (a,b). Relying on attnums extracted
from the whole OR clause, we'd consider the statistics usable. That does
not work, as we see the conditions as a single OR-clause, referencing an
attribute not covered by the statistic, leading to empty list of clauses
to be estimated using the statistics and an assert failure.
This changes choose_best_statistics to check which clauses are actually
covered, and only using attributes from the fully covered ones. For the
previous example this means the statistics object will not be considered
as compatible with the OR-clause.
Backpatch to 12, where MCVs were introduced. The issue does not affect
older versions because functional dependencies don't handle OR clauses.
Author: Tomas Vondra
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed
Reported-By: Manuel Rigger
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+u7OA7H5rcE2=8f263w4NZD6ipO_XOrYB816nuLXbmSTH9pQQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
The subroutine pump_until provides the functionality to poll until the
given string is matched, or a timeout occurs. This can be used from other
places as well, so moving it to TestLib.pm. The immediate need is for an
upcoming regression test patch for dropdb utility.
Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAP_rwwmLJJbn70vLOZFpxGw3XD7nLB_7+NKz46H5EOO2k5H7OQ@mail.gmail.com
This clarifies instructions on how to dump/reload databases that use
incompatible isn versions.
Reported-by: Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191114190652.GA23586@alvherre.pgsql
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Backpatch-through: 13
Commit 114541d58e has upset some buildfarm members running Msys, that
weren't previously having problems, so the use of native Windows methods
to open files is restricted by this patch to only MSVC builds.
This build option was once useful to maintain compatibility with
version-0 functions, but those are no longer supported, so this option
is no longer useful for end users. We keep the option available to
developers in pg_config_manual.h so that it is easy to test the
pass-by-reference code paths without having to fire up a 32-bit
machine.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f3e1e576-2749-bbd7-2d57-3f9dcf75255a@2ndquadrant.com
Commit 9af34f3c6b naively assumed that all non-windows platforms would
have pseudoterminals and that perl would have IO::Pty. Such is not the
case. Instead of assumung anything, test for the presence of IO::Pty and
only use code that might depend on it if it's present. The test result is
exposed in $TestLib::have_io_pty so that it can be conveniently used in
SKIP tests.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191126044110.GB5435@paquier.xyz
The fix for CVE-2017-7484 disallowed use of pg_statistic data for
planning purposes if the user would not be able to select the associated
column and a non-leakproof function is to be applied to the statistics
values. That turns out to disable use of pg_statistic data in some
common cases involving inheritance/partitioning, where the user does
have permission to select from the parent table that was actually named
in the query, but not from a child table whose stats are needed. Since,
in non-corner cases, the user *can* select the child table's data via
the parent, this restriction is not actually useful from a security
standpoint. Improve the logic so that we also check the permissions of
the originally-named table, and allow access if select permission exists
for that.
When checking access to stats for a simple child column, we can map
the child column number back to the parent, and perform this test
exactly (including not allowing access if the child column isn't
exposed by the parent). For expression indexes, the current logic
just insists on whole-table select access, and this patch allows
access if the user can select the whole parent table. In principle,
if the child table has extra columns, this might allow access to
stats on columns the user can't read. In practice, it's unlikely
that the planner is going to do any stats calculations involving
expressions that are not visible to the query, so we'll ignore that
fine point for now. Perhaps someday we'll improve that logic to
detect exactly which columns are used by an expression index ...
but today is not that day.
Back-patch to v11. The issue was created in 9.2 and up by the
CVE-2017-7484 fix, but this patch depends on the append_rel_array[]
planner data structure which only exists in v11 and up. In
practice the issue is most urgent with partitioned tables, so
fixing v11 and later should satisfy much of the practical need.
Dilip Kumar and Amit Langote, with some kibitzing by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3876.1531261875@sss.pgh.pa.us
On some platforms, fsync() returns EBADFD when opening a file descriptor
with O_RDONLY (read-only), leading ultimately now to a PANIC to prevent
data corruption.
This commit adds a new sanity check in pg_fsync() based on fcntl() to
make sure that we don't repeat again mistakes with incorrectly-set file
descriptors so as problems are detected at an early stage. Without
that, such errors could only be detected after running Postgres on a
specific supported platform for the culprit code path, which could take
some time before being found. b8e19b93 was a fix for such a problem,
which got undetected for more than 5 years, and a586cc4b fixed another
similar issue.
Note that the new check added works as well when fsync=off is
configured, so as all regression tests would detect problems as long as
assertions are enabled. fcntl() being not available on Windows, the
new checks do not happen there.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191009062640.GB21379@paquier.xyz
Revert part of commit 19df1702f5.
Early shutdown was added by that commit so that we could collect
statistics from workers, but unfortunately, it interacted badly with
rescans. The problem is that we ended up destroying the parallel context
which is required for rescans. This leads to rescans of a Limit node over
a Gather node to produce unpredictable results as it tries to access
destroyed parallel context. By reverting the early shutdown code, we
might lose statistics in some cases of Limit over Gather [Merge], but that
will require further study to fix.
Reported-by: Jerry Sievers
Diagnosed-by: Thomas Munro
Author: Amit Kapila, testcase by Vignesh C
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87ims2amh6.fsf@jsievers.enova.com
AuxiliaryProcessMain does ProcSignalInit, so one might expect that
auxiliary processes would need to respond to SendProcSignal, but none
of the auxiliary processes do that. Change them to use
procsignal_sigusr1_handler instead of their own private handlers so
that they do. Besides seeming more correct, this is also less code. It
shouldn't make any functional difference right now because, as far as
we know, there are no current cases where SendProcSignal targets an
auxiliary process, but there are plans to change that in the future.
Andres Freund
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20181030051643.elbxjww5jjgnjaxg@alap3.anarazel.de
Tom Lane
Michael Paquier
Robert Haas
Alvaro Herrera
Peter Eisentraut
Etsuro Fujita
Tomas Vondra
Andrew Dunstan
Amit Kapila
Bruce Momjian